中华医学超声杂志(电子版)
中華醫學超聲雜誌(電子版)
중화의학초성잡지(전자판)
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ULTRASOUND(ELECTRONICAL VISION)
2015年
4期
319-324
,共6页
王锦惠%于子芳%闫芳%刘英%张烁
王錦惠%于子芳%閆芳%劉英%張爍
왕금혜%우자방%염방%류영%장삭
超声检查,介入性%超声检查,多普勒%受精,体外%胚胎移植
超聲檢查,介入性%超聲檢查,多普勒%受精,體外%胚胎移植
초성검사,개입성%초성검사,다보륵%수정,체외%배태이식
Ultrasonography,interventional%Ultrasonography,Doppler%Fertilizationin vitro%Embryo transfer
目的:应用经阴道二维及三维超声检测子宫内膜厚度、容积和内膜及内膜下血流,比较各参数对体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)中子宫内膜容受性的评估价值。方法应用经阴道二维及三维超声,对120例接受IVF-ET的不孕症患者于控制性超排卵(COH)周期人绒毛膜促性腺激素(HCG)注射日进行子宫内膜厚度、内膜容积、内膜及内膜下血流搏动指数(pulse index,PI)、阻力指数(resistance index,RI)、收缩期与舒张期比值(S/D)、内膜及内膜下区域的血管化指数(VI)、血流指数(FI)、血管化血流指数(VFI)测定,根据妊娠结果分为妊娠组与未妊娠组,比较两组之间各参数的差异。结果120例患者临床妊娠39例,妊娠率为32.5%。两组间子宫内膜厚度、内膜容积差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),子宫内膜厚度与内膜容积预测妊娠的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.584和0.557;妊娠组内膜及内膜下血流的PI、RI、S/D均明显低于非妊娠组,两组间比较差异均具有统计学意义(Z =-3.811、-3.097、-2.071,P =0.001、0.001、0.038);内膜及内膜下血流PI、RI、 S/D预测妊娠的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.652、0.611、0.612;妊娠组内膜及内膜下VI、FI、VFI参数均高于非妊娠组,两组间比较差异有统计学意义(Z =-1.970、-2.698、-1.981,P =0.490、0.007、0.048;Z =-2.098、-2.090、-2.115,P =0.036、0.037、0.034)。内膜及内膜下VI、FI、VFI预测妊娠的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.729、0.670、0.655及0.720、0.715、0.617。结论经阴道二维及三维超声可用于评价子宫内膜容受性、预测IVF-ET结局,二维及三维血流参数比较,内膜及内膜下容积血流参数VI对妊娠结果有一定的预测价值。
目的:應用經陰道二維及三維超聲檢測子宮內膜厚度、容積和內膜及內膜下血流,比較各參數對體外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)中子宮內膜容受性的評估價值。方法應用經陰道二維及三維超聲,對120例接受IVF-ET的不孕癥患者于控製性超排卵(COH)週期人絨毛膜促性腺激素(HCG)註射日進行子宮內膜厚度、內膜容積、內膜及內膜下血流搏動指數(pulse index,PI)、阻力指數(resistance index,RI)、收縮期與舒張期比值(S/D)、內膜及內膜下區域的血管化指數(VI)、血流指數(FI)、血管化血流指數(VFI)測定,根據妊娠結果分為妊娠組與未妊娠組,比較兩組之間各參數的差異。結果120例患者臨床妊娠39例,妊娠率為32.5%。兩組間子宮內膜厚度、內膜容積差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),子宮內膜厚度與內膜容積預測妊娠的ROC麯線下麵積分彆為0.584和0.557;妊娠組內膜及內膜下血流的PI、RI、S/D均明顯低于非妊娠組,兩組間比較差異均具有統計學意義(Z =-3.811、-3.097、-2.071,P =0.001、0.001、0.038);內膜及內膜下血流PI、RI、 S/D預測妊娠的ROC麯線下麵積分彆為0.652、0.611、0.612;妊娠組內膜及內膜下VI、FI、VFI參數均高于非妊娠組,兩組間比較差異有統計學意義(Z =-1.970、-2.698、-1.981,P =0.490、0.007、0.048;Z =-2.098、-2.090、-2.115,P =0.036、0.037、0.034)。內膜及內膜下VI、FI、VFI預測妊娠的ROC麯線下麵積分彆為0.729、0.670、0.655及0.720、0.715、0.617。結論經陰道二維及三維超聲可用于評價子宮內膜容受性、預測IVF-ET結跼,二維及三維血流參數比較,內膜及內膜下容積血流參數VI對妊娠結果有一定的預測價值。
목적:응용경음도이유급삼유초성검측자궁내막후도、용적화내막급내막하혈류,비교각삼수대체외수정-배태이식(IVF-ET)중자궁내막용수성적평고개치。방법응용경음도이유급삼유초성,대120례접수IVF-ET적불잉증환자우공제성초배란(COH)주기인융모막촉성선격소(HCG)주사일진행자궁내막후도、내막용적、내막급내막하혈류박동지수(pulse index,PI)、조력지수(resistance index,RI)、수축기여서장기비치(S/D)、내막급내막하구역적혈관화지수(VI)、혈류지수(FI)、혈관화혈류지수(VFI)측정,근거임신결과분위임신조여미임신조,비교량조지간각삼수적차이。결과120례환자림상임신39례,임신솔위32.5%。량조간자궁내막후도、내막용적차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),자궁내막후도여내막용적예측임신적ROC곡선하면적분별위0.584화0.557;임신조내막급내막하혈류적PI、RI、S/D균명현저우비임신조,량조간비교차이균구유통계학의의(Z =-3.811、-3.097、-2.071,P =0.001、0.001、0.038);내막급내막하혈류PI、RI、 S/D예측임신적ROC곡선하면적분별위0.652、0.611、0.612;임신조내막급내막하VI、FI、VFI삼수균고우비임신조,량조간비교차이유통계학의의(Z =-1.970、-2.698、-1.981,P =0.490、0.007、0.048;Z =-2.098、-2.090、-2.115,P =0.036、0.037、0.034)。내막급내막하VI、FI、VFI예측임신적ROC곡선하면적분별위0.729、0.670、0.655급0.720、0.715、0.617。결론경음도이유급삼유초성가용우평개자궁내막용수성、예측IVF-ET결국,이유급삼유혈류삼수비교,내막급내막하용적혈류삼수VI대임신결과유일정적예측개치。
ObjectiveTo determine endometrial thickness, endometrial volumeand, endometrial and subendometrial blood flows, by using transvaginal two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound examination and to compare the value of all the parameters in the prediction of endometrial receptivity during in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycles.MethodsOne hundred and twenty patients undergoing IVF cycles were recruited for this study. Transvaginal 2D and 3D ultrasound examination was performed to determine endometrial thickness, endometrial volume, pulsatility index (PI), resisitance index (RI) , systolic/diastolic ratio (S/D) of endometrial, subendometrial blood flows , vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI) and vascularization flow index (VFI) of endometrial and subendometrial regions by experienced sonographers on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) injection. Statistical comparison was carried out by Mann-Whitney test. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was applied and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Statistic analyses were performed using SPSS 13.0. The two-tailed value of was considered statistically significant.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the pregnant group and non-pregnant group in endometrial thickness, endometrial volume (P>0.05). Patients in the pregnant group had lower PI, RI and S/D of endometrial and subendometrial blood flows than those in the non-pregnant group (Z=-3.811,-3.097,-2.071, P=0.001, 0.001, 0.038), with statisticalsignificant difference. Patients in the pregnant group had higher VI, FI and VFI of endometrial and subendometrial regions than those in the non-pregnant group (Z=-1.970,-2.698,-1.981, P=0.490, 0.007, 0.048;Z=-2.098,-2.090,-2.115,P=0.036, 0.037, 0.034), with statistical significant difference. ConclusionsEndometrial and subendometria blood flows measured by transvaginal 2D and 3D ultrasound can be as a reliable indicator to assess endometrial receptivity and predict the pregnancy outcome. Among all the endometrial and subendometrial blood flow parameters, VI of endometrial and subendometrial are better predicators.