中国执业药师
中國執業藥師
중국집업약사
CHINA LICENSED PHARMACIST
2015年
5期
3-6
,共4页
唐捷%龙云%苏强%夏小燕%张惠
唐捷%龍雲%囌彊%夏小燕%張惠
당첩%룡운%소강%하소연%장혜
幽门螺杆菌%幽门螺杆菌根除率%疗效分析%铋制剂%微生态制剂
幽門螺桿菌%幽門螺桿菌根除率%療效分析%鉍製劑%微生態製劑
유문라간균%유문라간균근제솔%료효분석%필제제%미생태제제
Helicobacterpylori%Eradication Rate ofHelicobacterpylori%Efficacy Analysis%Bismuth Preparation%Probiotics
目的:对4种根除幽门螺杆菌感染的治疗方案进行疗效评价,探索根除幽门螺杆菌感染治疗的新途径。方法:选择2014年在本院就诊的经13C-尿素呼气试验(13C-UBT)或经胃黏膜活检快速尿素酶试验(RUT)及电子胃镜检查确诊为幽门螺杆菌感染的消化道溃疡患者240例,依病例入选先后次序按随机数字表法随机分为A、B、C、D 4组,每组60例,A组给予雷贝拉唑+阿莫西林+克拉霉素;B组给予雷贝拉唑+阿莫西林+左氧氟沙星;C组给予雷贝拉唑+枸橼酸铋钾+阿莫西林+呋喃唑酮;D组给予给予雷贝拉唑+阿莫西林+克拉霉素+双歧杆菌三联活菌肠溶胶囊;疗程均为14 d。比较4种治疗方案对幽门螺杆菌根除率的影响。结果:A、B、C、D 4组幽门螺杆菌根除率分别为73.3%,76.7%,93.3%,90.0%,A、B 2组疗效比较无统计学差异(P>0.05),C、D 2组疗效比较无统计学差异(P>0.05),但A、B 2组与C、D 2组疗效比较有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:传统的三联疗法以及含左氧氟沙星的三联疗法幽门螺杆菌根除率不理想,加用标准剂量的铋制剂、微生态制剂可显著提高幽门螺杆菌根除率,是治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的新途径。
目的:對4種根除幽門螺桿菌感染的治療方案進行療效評價,探索根除幽門螺桿菌感染治療的新途徑。方法:選擇2014年在本院就診的經13C-尿素呼氣試驗(13C-UBT)或經胃黏膜活檢快速尿素酶試驗(RUT)及電子胃鏡檢查確診為幽門螺桿菌感染的消化道潰瘍患者240例,依病例入選先後次序按隨機數字錶法隨機分為A、B、C、D 4組,每組60例,A組給予雷貝拉唑+阿莫西林+剋拉黴素;B組給予雷貝拉唑+阿莫西林+左氧氟沙星;C組給予雷貝拉唑+枸櫞痠鉍鉀+阿莫西林+呋喃唑酮;D組給予給予雷貝拉唑+阿莫西林+剋拉黴素+雙歧桿菌三聯活菌腸溶膠囊;療程均為14 d。比較4種治療方案對幽門螺桿菌根除率的影響。結果:A、B、C、D 4組幽門螺桿菌根除率分彆為73.3%,76.7%,93.3%,90.0%,A、B 2組療效比較無統計學差異(P>0.05),C、D 2組療效比較無統計學差異(P>0.05),但A、B 2組與C、D 2組療效比較有統計學差異(P<0.05)。結論:傳統的三聯療法以及含左氧氟沙星的三聯療法幽門螺桿菌根除率不理想,加用標準劑量的鉍製劑、微生態製劑可顯著提高幽門螺桿菌根除率,是治療幽門螺桿菌感染的新途徑。
목적:대4충근제유문라간균감염적치료방안진행료효평개,탐색근제유문라간균감염치료적신도경。방법:선택2014년재본원취진적경13C-뇨소호기시험(13C-UBT)혹경위점막활검쾌속뇨소매시험(RUT)급전자위경검사학진위유문라간균감염적소화도궤양환자240례,의병례입선선후차서안수궤수자표법수궤분위A、B、C、D 4조,매조60례,A조급여뢰패랍서+아막서림+극랍매소;B조급여뢰패랍서+아막서림+좌양불사성;C조급여뢰패랍서+구연산필갑+아막서림+부남서동;D조급여급여뢰패랍서+아막서림+극랍매소+쌍기간균삼련활균장용효낭;료정균위14 d。비교4충치료방안대유문라간균근제솔적영향。결과:A、B、C、D 4조유문라간균근제솔분별위73.3%,76.7%,93.3%,90.0%,A、B 2조료효비교무통계학차이(P>0.05),C、D 2조료효비교무통계학차이(P>0.05),단A、B 2조여C、D 2조료효비교유통계학차이(P<0.05)。결론:전통적삼련요법이급함좌양불사성적삼련요법유문라간균근제솔불이상,가용표준제량적필제제、미생태제제가현저제고유문라간균근제솔,시치료유문라간균감염적신도경。
ABSTRACTObjective:To evaluate the curative effects of 4 kinds of eradication therapy ofHelicobacterpylori (Hp)infection and explore the new way of eradication therapy of Hp infection.Methods:About 240 patients with peptic ulcer caused by Hp infection, who were diagnosed by13C - urea breath test(13C - UBT)or rapid urease test of gastric mucosa biopsy(RUT)and electronic gastroscopy in our hospital in 2014, were selected according to se-quence table and randomly divided into A, B, C and D groups, 60 cases in each group. Group A was given rabeprazole combined with amoxicillin and clarithromycin, group B was given rabeprazole combined with amoxi-cillin and levofloxacin, group C was treated with rabeprazole combined with bismuth potassium citrate, amoxicillin and furazolidone and group D was treated with rabeprazole combined with amoxicillin, clarithromycin and Bifid triple viable capsules dissolving at intestines, and the whole course of treatment was 14 days. To compare 4 kinds of therapy for Hp eradication rate.Results:The Hp eradication rates of 4 groups were 73.3%, 76.7%, 93.3% and 90.0%, the curative effects between groups A and B and between groups C and D had no significant differences (P>0.05), but there were significant differences in groups A, B and groups C, D(P<0.05).Conclusion:The Hp eradication rates of the conventional triple therapy and triple therapy with levofloxacin were not ideal, but the combined use with bismuth preparation and the standard dose of probiotics can significantly improve the Hp eradication rate. It may serve as a new way of treatment of Hp infection.