中华医院感染学杂志
中華醫院感染學雜誌
중화의원감염학잡지
Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
2015年
7期
1645-1646,1649
,共3页
腹腔镜手术%异位妊娠%失血性休克%感染%预防
腹腔鏡手術%異位妊娠%失血性休剋%感染%預防
복강경수술%이위임신%실혈성휴극%감염%예방
Laparoscopic surgery%Ectopic pregnancy%Hemorrhagic shock%Infection%Prevention
目的:探讨腹腔镜手术治疗异位妊娠出血性休克孕妇的临床效果,制定围术期感染预防措施,以降低感染率。方法选择妇产科2010年4月-2013年6月收治的异位妊娠伴出血孕妇124例,随机分为试验组和对照组各62例,对照组采用开腹术,试验组采用腹腔镜手术,比较两组相关指标,采用SPSS 13.0软件进行统计分析。结果试验组孕妇术后胃肠功能恢复时间、术后下床活动时间、住院天数、术后镇痛例数均明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组孕妇皮肤切开愈合情况良好,均为甲级愈合,试验组孕妇术后无感染出现,对照组有2例孕妇发生医院感染,两组医院感染率相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论抗休克治疗的同时进行腹腔镜手术,术中要求手术者技术熟练,同时做好严密的监测及围术期感染预防工作,降低感染率,提高治疗水平。
目的:探討腹腔鏡手術治療異位妊娠齣血性休剋孕婦的臨床效果,製定圍術期感染預防措施,以降低感染率。方法選擇婦產科2010年4月-2013年6月收治的異位妊娠伴齣血孕婦124例,隨機分為試驗組和對照組各62例,對照組採用開腹術,試驗組採用腹腔鏡手術,比較兩組相關指標,採用SPSS 13.0軟件進行統計分析。結果試驗組孕婦術後胃腸功能恢複時間、術後下床活動時間、住院天數、術後鎮痛例數均明顯低于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);兩組孕婦皮膚切開愈閤情況良好,均為甲級愈閤,試驗組孕婦術後無感染齣現,對照組有2例孕婦髮生醫院感染,兩組醫院感染率相比差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論抗休剋治療的同時進行腹腔鏡手術,術中要求手術者技術熟練,同時做好嚴密的鑑測及圍術期感染預防工作,降低感染率,提高治療水平。
목적:탐토복강경수술치료이위임신출혈성휴극잉부적림상효과,제정위술기감염예방조시,이강저감염솔。방법선택부산과2010년4월-2013년6월수치적이위임신반출혈잉부124례,수궤분위시험조화대조조각62례,대조조채용개복술,시험조채용복강경수술,비교량조상관지표,채용SPSS 13.0연건진행통계분석。결과시험조잉부술후위장공능회복시간、술후하상활동시간、주원천수、술후진통례수균명현저우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);량조잉부피부절개유합정황량호,균위갑급유합,시험조잉부술후무감염출현,대조조유2례잉부발생의원감염,량조의원감염솔상비차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론항휴극치료적동시진행복강경수술,술중요구수술자기술숙련,동시주호엄밀적감측급위술기감염예방공작,강저감염솔,제고치료수평。
OBJECTIVE To investigate the clinical effects of laparoscopic surgery for hemorrhagic shock in ectopic pregnancy ,and to explore prevention measures of perioperative infections to reduce infection rates .METHODS Totally 124 cases of ectopic pregnant women with bleeding in the obstetric department during Apr .2010 to Jun . 2013 were enrolled and randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group with 62 patients in each group .The control group received open surgery ,while the experimental group received laparoscopic surgery . Related indexes were compared between the two groups and the software SPSS 13 .0 was used for statistical analy‐sis .RESULTS The recovery duration of gastrointestinal function after surgery ,postoperative ambulation time , length of stay ,the number of cases of postoperative analgesia were significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (P<0 .05) .Both groups of patients had skin incision healed well which were Grade I healing .Postoperative hospital infections occurred in none cases in the experimental group and in 2 cases in the control group ,the difference in the hospital infection rate between the two groups was significant (P< 0 .05) . CONCLUSION Laparoscopic surgery which was performed with the anti‐shock treatment requires skilled operation as well as rigorous monitoring and perioperative infection prevention so as to reduce infection rates and improve treatment level .