临床骨科杂志
臨床骨科雜誌
림상골과잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS
2015年
2期
198-200
,共3页
丁克海%周其佳%孙月柏%左松球%王庆刚
丁剋海%週其佳%孫月柏%左鬆毬%王慶剛
정극해%주기가%손월백%좌송구%왕경강
股骨转子间骨折%股骨近端防旋髓内钉%螺旋刀片%安置位置
股骨轉子間骨摺%股骨近耑防鏇髓內釘%螺鏇刀片%安置位置
고골전자간골절%고골근단방선수내정%라선도편%안치위치
femoral intertrochanteric fractures%proximal femoral nail antirotation%helical blade%position
目的:探讨股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)螺旋刀片位置对老年股骨转子间骨折治疗效果的影响。方法对92例接受 PFNA 治疗的老年股骨转子间骨折患者按螺旋刀片在股骨头的放置位置不同分为:C/ C 组(44例,螺旋刀片正位及侧位均处于股骨头中心位置)和 I/ C 组(48例,螺旋刀片正位处于股骨头下1/3位置、侧位处于股骨头中心位置)。比较两组患者术后的骨折复位情况、术后完全负重时间、螺旋刀片的尖顶距(TAD)、骨折愈合时间、术后并发症及末次随访时髋关节 Harris 评分。结果两组患者的术后复位情况、完全负重时间、骨折愈合时间、术后并发症发生情况、术后各时点髋关节 Harris 评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后 TAD:C/ C 组为(22.07±2.84) mm,I/ C 组为(25.29±3.41) mm,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论 PFNA 两种螺旋刀片的安置位置治疗老年股骨转子间骨折患者均可取得良好效果,但两组的 TAD 有明显差异。
目的:探討股骨近耑防鏇髓內釘(PFNA)螺鏇刀片位置對老年股骨轉子間骨摺治療效果的影響。方法對92例接受 PFNA 治療的老年股骨轉子間骨摺患者按螺鏇刀片在股骨頭的放置位置不同分為:C/ C 組(44例,螺鏇刀片正位及側位均處于股骨頭中心位置)和 I/ C 組(48例,螺鏇刀片正位處于股骨頭下1/3位置、側位處于股骨頭中心位置)。比較兩組患者術後的骨摺複位情況、術後完全負重時間、螺鏇刀片的尖頂距(TAD)、骨摺愈閤時間、術後併髮癥及末次隨訪時髖關節 Harris 評分。結果兩組患者的術後複位情況、完全負重時間、骨摺愈閤時間、術後併髮癥髮生情況、術後各時點髖關節 Harris 評分比較差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05)。術後 TAD:C/ C 組為(22.07±2.84) mm,I/ C 組為(25.29±3.41) mm,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(P <0.05)。結論 PFNA 兩種螺鏇刀片的安置位置治療老年股骨轉子間骨摺患者均可取得良好效果,但兩組的 TAD 有明顯差異。
목적:탐토고골근단방선수내정(PFNA)라선도편위치대노년고골전자간골절치료효과적영향。방법대92례접수 PFNA 치료적노년고골전자간골절환자안라선도편재고골두적방치위치불동분위:C/ C 조(44례,라선도편정위급측위균처우고골두중심위치)화 I/ C 조(48례,라선도편정위처우고골두하1/3위치、측위처우고골두중심위치)。비교량조환자술후적골절복위정황、술후완전부중시간、라선도편적첨정거(TAD)、골절유합시간、술후병발증급말차수방시관관절 Harris 평분。결과량조환자적술후복위정황、완전부중시간、골절유합시간、술후병발증발생정황、술후각시점관관절 Harris 평분비교차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05)。술후 TAD:C/ C 조위(22.07±2.84) mm,I/ C 조위(25.29±3.41) mm,량조비교차이유통계학의의(P <0.05)。결론 PFNA 량충라선도편적안치위치치료노년고골전자간골절환자균가취득량호효과,단량조적 TAD 유명현차이。
Objective To investigate the impact of helical blade positions on therapy effects of elderly femoral inter-trochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation(PFNA). Methods 92 elderly femoral intertro-chanteric fractures receiving PFNA retrospectively were analyzed. All patients were divided into C/ C group (44 ca-ses), the helical blade of which were at the center of the femoral head in both anteroposterior and lateral views, and I/ C group (48 cases), the helical blade of which was at the inferior one third of the femoral head in anteroposterior view and at the center in lateral view. The above two groups were compared in terms of fracture healing and recovery, full weight bearing time, tip-apex distance(TAD), fracture healing time, postoperation complication occurrence, and Harris Hip Score (HHS) at the follow-up 6 months after operation. Results There were no significant differences between those two groups regarding fracture healing and recovery, full weight bearing time, TAD, fracture healing time, postoperation complication occurrence, and HHS at the follow-up 6 months after operation (P > 0. 05). The average TAD after operation was (22. 07 ± 2. 84) mm in C/ C group and (25. 29 ± 3. 41) mm in I/ C group, and the difference was significant ( P < 0. 05). Conclusions The above two helical blade positions can achieve similar effects for elderly femoral intertrochanteric fractures with PFNA,but the TAD are different between two groups.