哈尔滨医药
哈爾濱醫藥
합이빈의약
HARBIN MEDICAL JOURNAL
2015年
2期
97-99
,共3页
人工流产%流产后关爱服务%效果评价
人工流產%流產後關愛服務%效果評價
인공유산%유산후관애복무%효과평개
Artificial abortion%After abortion care services%Effect evaluation
目的:探究流产后关爱服务( Post-abortion care, PAC)对人工流产妇女术后护理效果,为医院的PAC工作提供参考。方法于2013年在医院行人工流产术的女性中随机选取4538例进行回顾与分析。随机分组法分为观察组(2269)例,对照组(2269)例。对照组实施常规护理,观察组实施相关PAC护理。结果观察组妇女重复流产率(6.39%)、高危流产率(4.58%)显著低于对照组妇女重复流产率(12.74%)、高危流产率(10.45%)。观察者未避孕(0.57%)、常规避孕(22.21%)均显著低于对照组未避孕(2.47%)、常规避孕(34.51%)。观察者高效避孕(28.29%)显著高于对照组高效避孕(10.18%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 PAC能更有效地减少女性的重复流产,提高流产后女性的有效避孕率。保障女性生殖健康,值得临床推广。
目的:探究流產後關愛服務( Post-abortion care, PAC)對人工流產婦女術後護理效果,為醫院的PAC工作提供參攷。方法于2013年在醫院行人工流產術的女性中隨機選取4538例進行迴顧與分析。隨機分組法分為觀察組(2269)例,對照組(2269)例。對照組實施常規護理,觀察組實施相關PAC護理。結果觀察組婦女重複流產率(6.39%)、高危流產率(4.58%)顯著低于對照組婦女重複流產率(12.74%)、高危流產率(10.45%)。觀察者未避孕(0.57%)、常規避孕(22.21%)均顯著低于對照組未避孕(2.47%)、常規避孕(34.51%)。觀察者高效避孕(28.29%)顯著高于對照組高效避孕(10.18%),差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論 PAC能更有效地減少女性的重複流產,提高流產後女性的有效避孕率。保障女性生殖健康,值得臨床推廣。
목적:탐구유산후관애복무( Post-abortion care, PAC)대인공유산부녀술후호리효과,위의원적PAC공작제공삼고。방법우2013년재의원행인공유산술적녀성중수궤선취4538례진행회고여분석。수궤분조법분위관찰조(2269)례,대조조(2269)례。대조조실시상규호리,관찰조실시상관PAC호리。결과관찰조부녀중복유산솔(6.39%)、고위유산솔(4.58%)현저저우대조조부녀중복유산솔(12.74%)、고위유산솔(10.45%)。관찰자미피잉(0.57%)、상규피잉(22.21%)균현저저우대조조미피잉(2.47%)、상규피잉(34.51%)。관찰자고효피잉(28.29%)현저고우대조조고효피잉(10.18%),차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론 PAC능경유효지감소녀성적중복유산,제고유산후녀성적유효피잉솔。보장녀성생식건강,치득림상추엄。
Objective To explore the abortion after care service ( Post - abortion Care, PAC) postoperative nursing effect of artificial abortion women, provide reference for hospital work of PAC. Methods In 2013, the author on the hospital do abortion sur-gery in women randomly selected from 4538 cases of review and analysis. Random grouping method was divided into observation group (n=2269), the control group (n= 2269). Implementation of the control group, routine nursing group in the PAC care. Results The group of women repeated spontaneous abortion rate (6. 39%), high-risk abortion rate (4. 58%) was significantly lower than the control group (12. 74%), (10. 45%). Observer not contraception (0. 57%), regular contraceptives (22. 21%) were significantly lower than the control group (2. 47%), (34. 51%). Observer efficient contraceptives (28. 29%) was significantly higher than con-trol group (10. 18%), which was statistically significant differences (P< 0. 05). Conclusion PAC can more effectively reduce a woman′s repeated miscarriages, improve the effective contraceptive use women after the abortion. Protect the female reproductive health, it is worth clinical promotion.