比较教育研究
比較教育研究
비교교육연구
COMPARATIVE EDUCATION REVIEW
2015年
4期
15-20
,共6页
教育政策比较研究%价值%限度%规范
教育政策比較研究%價值%限度%規範
교육정책비교연구%개치%한도%규범
educational policy’s comparative research%value%limitation%standard
教育政策比较研究作为比较教育的分支领域，从单一国别的历时态纵向比较，发展为国别间就某一范畴具体内容的横向比较，进而上升到政策形成过程中的制度性探讨。教育政策比较研究这一议题在实践应用中，具有“硬币的两面性”：一方面，思维逻辑的重建、文本脉络的厘清、范式取向的调整这三个维度，彰显了政策比较研究的内在价值；而另一方面，“全球—地方化”、价值冲突、非理性修辞、文化偏见等因素，又是政策比较研究中无以超脱的局限。要实现教育政策在并置中比较，需要借助整体化立场、政策知识“、以证据为本”的研究，予以规范。
教育政策比較研究作為比較教育的分支領域，從單一國彆的歷時態縱嚮比較，髮展為國彆間就某一範疇具體內容的橫嚮比較，進而上升到政策形成過程中的製度性探討。教育政策比較研究這一議題在實踐應用中，具有“硬幣的兩麵性”：一方麵，思維邏輯的重建、文本脈絡的釐清、範式取嚮的調整這三箇維度，彰顯瞭政策比較研究的內在價值；而另一方麵，“全毬—地方化”、價值遲突、非理性脩辭、文化偏見等因素，又是政策比較研究中無以超脫的跼限。要實現教育政策在併置中比較，需要藉助整體化立場、政策知識“、以證據為本”的研究，予以規範。
교육정책비교연구작위비교교육적분지영역，종단일국별적력시태종향비교，발전위국별간취모일범주구체내용적횡향비교，진이상승도정책형성과정중적제도성탐토。교육정책비교연구저일의제재실천응용중，구유“경폐적량면성”：일방면，사유라집적중건、문본맥락적전청、범식취향적조정저삼개유도，창현료정책비교연구적내재개치；이령일방면，“전구—지방화”、개치충돌、비이성수사、문화편견등인소，우시정책비교연구중무이초탈적국한。요실현교육정책재병치중비교，수요차조정체화립장、정책지식“、이증거위본”적연구，여이규범。
As a branch field of comparative education, the researchers of education policy comparison have undergone three stages, from the diachronic comparison of a country to the horizontal comparison of specific theme, and then to focus on the system of making-policy. Comparative research on educational police presents the char-acteristics of a coin, which has two sides. On the one hand, it has shown internal significances in three dimensions such as reconstruction of thinking logic, clarification of text context and perfection of paradigm orientation;On the other hand, it can hardly get out of the policy limitation caused by“global-localization”, value conflict, irrational rhetoric and cultural prejudice. In order to well make comparison of educational policy in concatenation, it needs to take integrated position, policy knowledge, evidence-based research to standardize it.
