CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探求平衡针刀治疗颈椎病的临床疗效。方法选择颈椎病患者80例，剔除10例，并随机分为两组，即平衡针刀治疗颈椎病35例（治疗组），传统针灸治疗颈椎病35例（对照组），分别治疗1个疗程，随访半年。对治疗前、治疗后简式McGill疼痛问卷评分及两组临床疗效进行分析比较。结果治疗组与对照组治疗后McGill评分均较治疗前降低（ P＜0．01）；治疗后McGill评分治疗组均低于对照组（ P＜0．05）；治疗组总有效率为92．7％，对照组总有效率为71．4％，两组比较P＜0．05。以上数据说明治疗组与对照组疗效有明显差异。结论平衡针刀治疗颈椎病效果显著。
목적：탐구평형침도치료경추병적림상료효。방법선택경추병환자80례，척제10례，병수궤분위량조，즉평형침도치료경추병35례（치료조），전통침구치료경추병35례（대조조），분별치료1개료정，수방반년。대치료전、치료후간식McGill동통문권평분급량조림상료효진행분석비교。결과치료조여대조조치료후McGill평분균교치료전강저（ P＜0．01）；치료후McGill평분치료조균저우대조조（ P＜0．05）；치료조총유효솔위92．7％，대조조총유효솔위71．4％，량조비교P＜0．05。이상수거설명치료조여대조조료효유명현차이。결론평형침도치료경추병효과현저。
Objective To study the clinical curative effect of needle-scalpel treatment for cervical spondylosis.Methods We selected 80 cases of cervical spondylosis patients, and divided them into two groups at random, that is,35 cases for balance needle-scalpel treatment for cervical spondylosis( treatment group) ,and the other 35 cases for traditional acupuncture therapy( contrast group) .To proceed with 1 courses of treatment respectively and to estimate the cure within the subsequent 6 months.We analysed and compared the short McGill pain questionnaire score and the clinical curative effect of the two groups.Results After treatment, McGill score in treatment group and contrast group were both lower than that before(P<0.01).After treatment, the McGill score of treatment group were lower than the contrast group (P<0.05) .The overall effectiveness of the treatment group was 92.7%, while the contrast group was 71.4%.The comparison was significant (P<0.05).These data showed that there was notable difference between the two groups.Conclusions Balance Needle-scalpel treatment is more effective.