胃肠病学和肝病学杂志
胃腸病學和肝病學雜誌
위장병학화간병학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
2015年
4期
402-405
,共4页
陈平%江明万%于双%王立友%田德安
陳平%江明萬%于雙%王立友%田德安
진평%강명만%우쌍%왕립우%전덕안
标准四联疗法%序贯疗法%胃溃疡%幽门螺杆菌阳性
標準四聯療法%序貫療法%胃潰瘍%幽門螺桿菌暘性
표준사련요법%서관요법%위궤양%유문라간균양성
Standard quadruple therapy%Sequential therapy%Gastric ulcer%Helicobacter pylori positive
目的:对比分析标准四联疗法和序贯疗法治疗胃溃疡H.pylori阳性患者的临床疗效。方法收集重庆三峡中心医院消化内科2012年1月-2013年12月120例胃溃疡H.pylori阳性患者,并随机分为实验组和对照组。其中实验组予以序贯疗法(前5 d予以雷贝拉唑肠溶片20 mg+阿莫西林1000 mg,2次/d,后5 d予以雷贝拉唑肠溶片20 mg+左氧氟沙星200 mg+克拉霉素500 mg,2次/d)。对照组予以标准四联疗法(雷贝拉唑肠溶片20 mg+阿莫西林1000 mg+胶体果胶铋220 mg+克拉霉素500 mg,2次/d)。对比两组患者治疗前及治疗结束4周后的Glasgow评分;对比两组患者治疗结束4周后的H.pylori根除情况(14 C呼气试验)及内镜下溃疡治疗有效率。同时对比两组患者治疗期间药物不良反应发生率。结果治疗结束4周后,两组患者的临床症状评分均显著低于治疗前(P<0.01),且实验组显著低于对照组(P<0.01);两组患者腹痛、腹胀和反酸嗳气症状评分均显著低于治疗前,且实验组显著低于对照组(P<0.01);实验组的H.pylori根除率显著高于对照组(P<0.05);实验组胃镜下的溃疡愈合总有效率显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。两组患者治疗期间不良反应发生率相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论序贯疗法在治疗胃溃疡中根除H.pylori,改善患者症状和促进溃疡愈合的疗效优于标准四联疗法,同时不增加不良反应发生率,可以作为胃溃疡H.pylori阳性患者的初治首选方案。
目的:對比分析標準四聯療法和序貫療法治療胃潰瘍H.pylori暘性患者的臨床療效。方法收集重慶三峽中心醫院消化內科2012年1月-2013年12月120例胃潰瘍H.pylori暘性患者,併隨機分為實驗組和對照組。其中實驗組予以序貫療法(前5 d予以雷貝拉唑腸溶片20 mg+阿莫西林1000 mg,2次/d,後5 d予以雷貝拉唑腸溶片20 mg+左氧氟沙星200 mg+剋拉黴素500 mg,2次/d)。對照組予以標準四聯療法(雷貝拉唑腸溶片20 mg+阿莫西林1000 mg+膠體果膠鉍220 mg+剋拉黴素500 mg,2次/d)。對比兩組患者治療前及治療結束4週後的Glasgow評分;對比兩組患者治療結束4週後的H.pylori根除情況(14 C呼氣試驗)及內鏡下潰瘍治療有效率。同時對比兩組患者治療期間藥物不良反應髮生率。結果治療結束4週後,兩組患者的臨床癥狀評分均顯著低于治療前(P<0.01),且實驗組顯著低于對照組(P<0.01);兩組患者腹痛、腹脹和反痠噯氣癥狀評分均顯著低于治療前,且實驗組顯著低于對照組(P<0.01);實驗組的H.pylori根除率顯著高于對照組(P<0.05);實驗組胃鏡下的潰瘍愈閤總有效率顯著高于對照組(P<0.05)。兩組患者治療期間不良反應髮生率相比,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論序貫療法在治療胃潰瘍中根除H.pylori,改善患者癥狀和促進潰瘍愈閤的療效優于標準四聯療法,同時不增加不良反應髮生率,可以作為胃潰瘍H.pylori暘性患者的初治首選方案。
목적:대비분석표준사련요법화서관요법치료위궤양H.pylori양성환자적림상료효。방법수집중경삼협중심의원소화내과2012년1월-2013년12월120례위궤양H.pylori양성환자,병수궤분위실험조화대조조。기중실험조여이서관요법(전5 d여이뢰패랍서장용편20 mg+아막서림1000 mg,2차/d,후5 d여이뢰패랍서장용편20 mg+좌양불사성200 mg+극랍매소500 mg,2차/d)。대조조여이표준사련요법(뢰패랍서장용편20 mg+아막서림1000 mg+효체과효필220 mg+극랍매소500 mg,2차/d)。대비량조환자치료전급치료결속4주후적Glasgow평분;대비량조환자치료결속4주후적H.pylori근제정황(14 C호기시험)급내경하궤양치료유효솔。동시대비량조환자치료기간약물불량반응발생솔。결과치료결속4주후,량조환자적림상증상평분균현저저우치료전(P<0.01),차실험조현저저우대조조(P<0.01);량조환자복통、복창화반산애기증상평분균현저저우치료전,차실험조현저저우대조조(P<0.01);실험조적H.pylori근제솔현저고우대조조(P<0.05);실험조위경하적궤양유합총유효솔현저고우대조조(P<0.05)。량조환자치료기간불량반응발생솔상비,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론서관요법재치료위궤양중근제H.pylori,개선환자증상화촉진궤양유합적료효우우표준사련요법,동시불증가불량반응발생솔,가이작위위궤양H.pylori양성환자적초치수선방안。
Objective To analyze the efficacy of standard quadruple and sequential therapy for gastric ulcer with H.pylori positive patients .Methods One hundred and twenty gastric ulcer with H.pylori positive patients from Jan . 2012 to Dec.2013 in the Central Hospital of Chengqing Three Gorges were selected and divided into the experimental group and control group .The experimental group received sequential therapy ( first five days:rabeprazole enteric coated tablets 20 mg +amoxicillin 1 000 mg bid, next five days:rabeprazole enteric coated tablets 20 mg +levofloxacin 200 mg+clarithromycin 500 mg bid ) .The control group received standard quadruple therapy ( rabeprazole enteric coated tablets 20 mg +amoxicillin 1 000 mg +colloidal bismuth pectin 220 mg +clarithromycin 500 mg bid).The Glasgow score of two groups before treatment and at 4 th week after the treatment was compared .The abdominal pain , abdominal distention and sour regurgitation scores of two groups before treatment and at 4 th week after the treatment were com-pared.The H.pylori eradication conditions (14C breath test) and endoscopic ulcer treatment efficiency of two groups at 4 th week after the treatment were compared .The incidence of adverse reactions of two groups during treatment was also compared .Results At 4 th week after treatment , the Glasgow score of two groups was significantly lower than that be-fore the treatment , while that in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group ( P <0 .01 );the abdominal pain , abdominal distention and sour regurgitation scores of two groups were significantly lower than those before the treatment , while the abdominal pain , abdominal distention and sour regurgitation scores of the ex-perimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.01).The H.pylori eradication condi-tions ( 14 C breath test ) and endoscopic ulcer treatment efficiency of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group ( P<0 .05 ) .The incidence of adverse reactions during treatment had no significant difference between two groups (P>0.05).Conclusion The sequential therapy for gastric ulcers with H.pylori positive patients can improve symptoms and promote ulcer healing more effectively than standard quadruple therapy , while it is without increasing the incidence of adverse reactions .The sequential therapy can be used as the initial treatment of choice for gastric ulcer with H.pylori positive patients .