怀化学院学报
懷化學院學報
부화학원학보
JOURNAL OF HUAIHUA TEACHERS COLLEGE
2015年
3期
62-64
,共3页
道路交通事故%损害赔偿%法律冲突%命价争议
道路交通事故%損害賠償%法律遲突%命價爭議
도로교통사고%손해배상%법률충돌%명개쟁의
road traffic accident%damage compensation%legal conflict%dispute of life charge
道路交通事故致死损害赔偿是生命体因受到道路交通事故非法侵害而遭受死亡时,法律要求死亡侵害人以货币的形式对死亡权利人予以赔偿的一种救济制度,是在生命价值不可评估与生命权受损不可救济的传统理论之下,民事立法的一大创新点。然而,现行道路交通事故损害赔偿制度因民行责任混同、民刑程序冲突、城乡赔偿差异等导致法律适用突出,亟待在立足实践调研的基础之上,从理论层面厘清赔偿的本质与功能,从立法层面规避“命”“价”结合的阻碍,衡平民、行、刑三者责任的划分,从实践层面探寻集自我预防、交通监管、司法审判、社会保障于一体的全方位解决路径,真正维护权利人的合法权益。
道路交通事故緻死損害賠償是生命體因受到道路交通事故非法侵害而遭受死亡時,法律要求死亡侵害人以貨幣的形式對死亡權利人予以賠償的一種救濟製度,是在生命價值不可評估與生命權受損不可救濟的傳統理論之下,民事立法的一大創新點。然而,現行道路交通事故損害賠償製度因民行責任混同、民刑程序遲突、城鄉賠償差異等導緻法律適用突齣,亟待在立足實踐調研的基礎之上,從理論層麵釐清賠償的本質與功能,從立法層麵規避“命”“價”結閤的阻礙,衡平民、行、刑三者責任的劃分,從實踐層麵探尋集自我預防、交通鑑管、司法審判、社會保障于一體的全方位解決路徑,真正維護權利人的閤法權益。
도로교통사고치사손해배상시생명체인수도도로교통사고비법침해이조수사망시,법률요구사망침해인이화폐적형식대사망권리인여이배상적일충구제제도,시재생명개치불가평고여생명권수손불가구제적전통이론지하,민사입법적일대창신점。연이,현행도로교통사고손해배상제도인민행책임혼동、민형정서충돌、성향배상차이등도치법률괄용돌출,극대재립족실천조연적기출지상,종이론층면전청배상적본질여공능,종입법층면규피“명”“개”결합적조애,형평민、행、형삼자책임적화분,종실천층면탐심집자아예방、교통감관、사법심판、사회보장우일체적전방위해결로경,진정유호권리인적합법권익。
Road traffic accident damage compensation refers to a relief system that the law requires the infringer to pay for the death of the obliger on currency when a living body dies because of the road traffic accident . It's a major innovation in civil tort legislation under the traditional theory that life is priceless and the damage of the life right can't be remedied . However , for some reasons , such as confusing civil and administrative liability , civil and criminal proceedings clash , differences in the amount of compensation between the urban and rural areas and so on , making road traffic accident damages institutional system in a mess and imperfect , urgently based on the current situation in practice , the present road traffic accident damage compensation system needs to clarify the nature and function of compensation from the theoretical level , to avoid the obstruction of “life” together with “price” , and chancery division of responsibilities of civil , administrative and criminal from the legislative level , and to explore round solution paths covering self -prevention , traffic regulation , justice and social security , which can really protect the legal interests of obliger .