怀化学院学报
懷化學院學報
부화학원학보
JOURNAL OF HUAIHUA TEACHERS COLLEGE
2015年
3期
58-61
,共4页
沉默权%不得强迫自证其罪%默示%若隐若现
沉默權%不得彊迫自證其罪%默示%若隱若現
침묵권%불득강박자증기죄%묵시%약은약현
right to silence%no compelled self-incrimination%implied%hidden and revealed
将从分析现行刑事诉讼法第50条和第118条入手,论证我国新刑诉法实质上没有默示沉默权和明示沉默权,也没有审判沉默权和审讯沉默权。沉默权在我国刑事诉讼法中虽然若隐若现,但是我国刑事诉讼法中实质上没有确立沉默权。
將從分析現行刑事訴訟法第50條和第118條入手,論證我國新刑訴法實質上沒有默示沉默權和明示沉默權,也沒有審判沉默權和審訊沉默權。沉默權在我國刑事訴訟法中雖然若隱若現,但是我國刑事訴訟法中實質上沒有確立沉默權。
장종분석현행형사소송법제50조화제118조입수,론증아국신형소법실질상몰유묵시침묵권화명시침묵권,야몰유심판침묵권화심신침묵권。침묵권재아국형사소송법중수연약은약현,단시아국형사소송법중실질상몰유학립침묵권。
This paper analyzes the Article 50 and Article 118 of the current criminal procedure law to demonstrate that there is no implied right to silence or expressive right to silence and that there is no trial right to silence or interrogation right to silence either . Although the right to silence in Chinese criminal procedure law is hidden and revealed , in fact there is no establishment of right to silence in our criminal procedure law .