中国组织工程研究
中國組織工程研究
중국조직공정연구
Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
2015年
12期
1832-1836
,共5页
生物材料%口腔生物材料%正畸专用牙刷%普通牙刷%牙间刷%釉质脱矿
生物材料%口腔生物材料%正畸專用牙刷%普通牙刷%牙間刷%釉質脫礦
생물재료%구강생물재료%정기전용아쇄%보통아쇄%아간쇄%유질탈광
Tissue Engineering%Dental Enamel%Dental Plaque
背景：近年来，有大量关于防正畸牙釉质脱矿方面的研究，但目前还未有学者对普通牙刷、正畸专用牙刷及牙间刷3者做过这方面的比较研究。目的：比较分别使用普通牙刷、正畸牙刷及牙间刷对正畸牙釉质脱矿的影响。方法：将12-17岁的青少年正畸患者按使用牙刷的种类不同，随机分成普通牙刷组、正畸专用牙刷组和牙间刷组。由同一正畸专科医生检查并计算矫治前和矫治1年后釉质脱矿指数和釉质脱矿增加指数。结果与结论：正畸治疗前，3组患者的釉质脱矿指数差异无显著性意义(P >0.05)。治疗1年后，各组患者的釉质脱矿指数均大于其矫治前(P <0.05)。矫治1年后，3组间脱矿指数及脱矿增加指数的两两比较：正畸专用牙刷组<普通牙刷组<牙间刷组(P <0.05)。结果证实，使用正畸专用牙刷对防治正畸治疗中的釉质脱矿效果更好，更适用于正畸人群；而单独使用牙间刷并不能起到很好的防止釉质脱矿的作用。
揹景：近年來，有大量關于防正畸牙釉質脫礦方麵的研究，但目前還未有學者對普通牙刷、正畸專用牙刷及牙間刷3者做過這方麵的比較研究。目的：比較分彆使用普通牙刷、正畸牙刷及牙間刷對正畸牙釉質脫礦的影響。方法：將12-17歲的青少年正畸患者按使用牙刷的種類不同，隨機分成普通牙刷組、正畸專用牙刷組和牙間刷組。由同一正畸專科醫生檢查併計算矯治前和矯治1年後釉質脫礦指數和釉質脫礦增加指數。結果與結論：正畸治療前，3組患者的釉質脫礦指數差異無顯著性意義(P >0.05)。治療1年後，各組患者的釉質脫礦指數均大于其矯治前(P <0.05)。矯治1年後，3組間脫礦指數及脫礦增加指數的兩兩比較：正畸專用牙刷組<普通牙刷組<牙間刷組(P <0.05)。結果證實，使用正畸專用牙刷對防治正畸治療中的釉質脫礦效果更好，更適用于正畸人群；而單獨使用牙間刷併不能起到很好的防止釉質脫礦的作用。
배경：근년래，유대량관우방정기아유질탈광방면적연구，단목전환미유학자대보통아쇄、정기전용아쇄급아간쇄3자주과저방면적비교연구。목적：비교분별사용보통아쇄、정기아쇄급아간쇄대정기아유질탈광적영향。방법：장12-17세적청소년정기환자안사용아쇄적충류불동，수궤분성보통아쇄조、정기전용아쇄조화아간쇄조。유동일정기전과의생검사병계산교치전화교치1년후유질탈광지수화유질탈광증가지수。결과여결론：정기치료전，3조환자적유질탈광지수차이무현저성의의(P >0.05)。치료1년후，각조환자적유질탈광지수균대우기교치전(P <0.05)。교치1년후，3조간탈광지수급탈광증가지수적량량비교：정기전용아쇄조<보통아쇄조<아간쇄조(P <0.05)。결과증실，사용정기전용아쇄대방치정기치료중적유질탈광효과경호，경괄용우정기인군；이단독사용아간쇄병불능기도흔호적방지유질탈광적작용。
BACKGROUND:A number of studies have been conducted on the prevention of enamel demineralization in orthodontic treatment, but no work has been carried out on the comparative studies addressing manual toothbrush, orthodontic fur V brush and interdental brush. OBJECTIVE:To compare the efficacy of manual toothbrush, orthodontic fur V brush and interdental brush on enamel decalcification during orthodontic treatment. METHODS:Adolescents, aged 12 to 17 years old, were randomly and averagely divided into three groups: manual toothbrush, orthodontic fur V brush, and interdental brush groups. Enamel decalcification index and augmenter of enamel decalcification index were examined and calculated by the same orthodontist before treatment and 1 year later. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: There was no statistical difference in the enamel decalcification index among the three groups at the beginning (P > 0.05). After 1 year of treatment, the enamel decalcification index of each group was higher than that at the beginning (P < 0.05); the enamel decalcification index and augmenter of enamel decalcification index in the three groups were ranked as folows: orthodontic Fur V toothbrush group < manual toothbrush < interdental toothbrush group , and there was a statistical significant difference among the three groups (P < 0.05). Orthodontic fur V brush is proved to have advantages over manual toothbrush and interdental brush in the respect of controling enamel decalcification, and interdental brush has no good effect on preventing enamel demineralization while it is used alone.
