中国卫生标准管理
中國衛生標準管理
중국위생표준관리
CHINA HEALTH STANDARD MANAGEMENT
2015年
7期
79-80
,共2页
一次性根管充填%慢性牙髓炎%疼痛%治疗
一次性根管充填%慢性牙髓炎%疼痛%治療
일차성근관충전%만성아수염%동통%치료
Root canal fil ing%Chronic pulpitis%Pain%Treatment
目的：对慢性牙髓炎伴疼痛患者接受一次性根管充填治疗的效果进行研究。方法选择慢性牙髓炎伴疼痛患者88例，分为对照组和治疗组，每组44例。分别进行常规根管充填术治疗和一次性根管充填术治疗。结果治疗组患者慢性牙髓炎伴疼痛疾病治疗效果优于对照组；口腔疾病治疗总时间短于对照组。结论慢性牙髓炎伴疼痛患者应用一次性根管充填术治疗效果明显。
目的：對慢性牙髓炎伴疼痛患者接受一次性根管充填治療的效果進行研究。方法選擇慢性牙髓炎伴疼痛患者88例，分為對照組和治療組，每組44例。分彆進行常規根管充填術治療和一次性根管充填術治療。結果治療組患者慢性牙髓炎伴疼痛疾病治療效果優于對照組；口腔疾病治療總時間短于對照組。結論慢性牙髓炎伴疼痛患者應用一次性根管充填術治療效果明顯。
목적：대만성아수염반동통환자접수일차성근관충전치료적효과진행연구。방법선택만성아수염반동통환자88례，분위대조조화치료조，매조44례。분별진행상규근관충전술치료화일차성근관충전술치료。결과치료조환자만성아수염반동통질병치료효과우우대조조；구강질병치료총시간단우대조조。결론만성아수염반동통환자응용일차성근관충전술치료효과명현。
Objective To research pulpitis chronic pain patients with a one-time effect of root canal therapy. Methods 88 Patients with chronic pain pulpitis were divided into a control group(n = 44)and the treatment group(n = 44). Patients were given respectively conventional root canal treatment and one root canal treatment. Results There was better treatment efficacy in treatment group than the control group. Total time of treatment of oral disease in treatment group was significantly shorter than the control group. Conclusion One-time root canal therapy pulpitis chronic pain is obvious.
