医学美学美容（中旬刊）
醫學美學美容（中旬刊）
의학미학미용（중순간）
MEDICAL AESTHETICS AND COSMETOLOGY
2015年
3期
429-429
,共1页
经桡动脉介入术%止血方法%临床护理
經橈動脈介入術%止血方法%臨床護理
경뇨동맥개입술%지혈방법%림상호리
Transradial intervention%Hemostasis%Clinical nursing
目的：比较经桡动脉行介入术后使用两种不同方法压迫穿刺点止血的效果。方法将经桡动脉途径行介入术患者300例，随机分成 A 组和 B 组，每组各150例。A 组采用弹力绷带包扎止血，B 组采用动脉压迫止血器止血，观察两组并发症发生情况。结果两组患者均成功止血，A 组局部并发症多，肿胀（P ＜0．05）、指端麻木（P ＜0．01）发生率均明显高于 B 组。结论动脉止血器法与常规弹力绷带止血法相比，操作快速简便，止血效果安全可靠，并发症发生率低。
目的：比較經橈動脈行介入術後使用兩種不同方法壓迫穿刺點止血的效果。方法將經橈動脈途徑行介入術患者300例，隨機分成 A 組和 B 組，每組各150例。A 組採用彈力繃帶包扎止血，B 組採用動脈壓迫止血器止血，觀察兩組併髮癥髮生情況。結果兩組患者均成功止血，A 組跼部併髮癥多，腫脹（P ＜0．05）、指耑痳木（P ＜0．01）髮生率均明顯高于 B 組。結論動脈止血器法與常規彈力繃帶止血法相比，操作快速簡便，止血效果安全可靠，併髮癥髮生率低。
목적：비교경뇨동맥행개입술후사용량충불동방법압박천자점지혈적효과。방법장경뇨동맥도경행개입술환자300례，수궤분성 A 조화 B 조，매조각150례。A 조채용탄력붕대포찰지혈，B 조채용동맥압박지혈기지혈，관찰량조병발증발생정황。결과량조환자균성공지혈，A 조국부병발증다，종창（P ＜0．05）、지단마목（P ＜0．01）발생솔균명현고우 B 조。결론동맥지혈기법여상규탄력붕대지혈법상비，조작쾌속간편，지혈효과안전가고，병발증발생솔저。
Objective To observe the ef ect of two hemostasis fol owing transradial intervention.Method 300 patients who accepted transradial intervention were enrol ed and divided into two groups randomly:group A (with normal bandage,150 cases),group B (with artery compression tourniquet,150 cases).The appening of complications were observed.Result Two groups stanched bleeding successful y,the swel ing (P <0.05)and acroanesthesia (P <0.01)in group A were higher than in group B.Conclusion Compared with normal bandage,radial artery hemo-static device was easy and rapid to be operated,safe and ef ective with low rate of complications.
