中华医学科研管理杂志
中華醫學科研管理雜誌
중화의학과연관리잡지
ZHONGHUA YIXUE KEYAN GUANLI ZAZHI CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH MANAGEMENT
2015年
2期
160-163
,共4页
国家自然科学基金%反馈意见分析%评议要素
國傢自然科學基金%反饋意見分析%評議要素
국가자연과학기금%반궤의견분석%평의요소
National Natural Science Foundation of China%Analysis of Feedback%on Factors
目的 探索分析国家自然科学基金同行评议要素对课题评审的影响.方法 基于国家自然科学基金同行评议专家反馈意见,统计10个评议要素申请中存在问题的百分比、专家关注的百分比和对中标的影响程度.结果 10个评议要素可分为4个组群:“核心要素”包括“研究内容”和“创新性”;“影响要素”包括“立项依据”、“经费预算”和“申请书撰写”;“基础要素”包括“科学意义及应用前景”和“研究基础”;“一般要素”,包括“申请者资质”、“研究团队”和“实验条件”.结论 从不同角度分析、考量评议要素可以帮助申请者和科研管理人员对症解决以提高国家自然科学基金的申报课题质量.
目的 探索分析國傢自然科學基金同行評議要素對課題評審的影響.方法 基于國傢自然科學基金同行評議專傢反饋意見,統計10箇評議要素申請中存在問題的百分比、專傢關註的百分比和對中標的影響程度.結果 10箇評議要素可分為4箇組群:“覈心要素”包括“研究內容”和“創新性”;“影響要素”包括“立項依據”、“經費預算”和“申請書撰寫”;“基礎要素”包括“科學意義及應用前景”和“研究基礎”;“一般要素”,包括“申請者資質”、“研究糰隊”和“實驗條件”.結論 從不同角度分析、攷量評議要素可以幫助申請者和科研管理人員對癥解決以提高國傢自然科學基金的申報課題質量.
목적 탐색분석국가자연과학기금동행평의요소대과제평심적영향.방법 기우국가자연과학기금동행평의전가반궤의견,통계10개평의요소신청중존재문제적백분비、전가관주적백분비화대중표적영향정도.결과 10개평의요소가분위4개조군:“핵심요소”포괄“연구내용”화“창신성”;“영향요소”포괄“립항의거”、“경비예산”화“신청서찬사”;“기출요소”포괄“과학의의급응용전경”화“연구기출”;“일반요소”,포괄“신청자자질”、“연구단대”화“실험조건”.결론 종불동각도분석、고량평의요소가이방조신청자화과연관리인원대증해결이제고국가자연과학기금적신보과제질량.
Objective To analyze the factors that affecting peer review evaluation for National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) award application.Methods Base on the feedback of NSFC peer review experts,total 10 evaluation factors were extracted for analysis.The percentage of common problem and in application,and percentage of key criteriaconcerned by reviewers,and their effect on funding situation were analyzed.Results 10 evaluatiion factors were divided into 4 groups:core factors including research content and innovation;factors including hypothesis,budget and writing,basic factors including the significance of research and previous study,general factors including experience and capacity of applicants,research team and laboratory condition.Conclusions Analysis and evaluate of peer review factors from different angle may help applicants and administrators to improve the quality of NSFC application and evaluation.
