CAJ | 학술논문

目的：比较以案例为基础的教学法（CBL）和以讲授为基础的教学法（LBL）在泌尿外科临床见习学生中的教学效果。方法将在泌尿外科见习的学生随机分为 CBL 组和 LBL 组，分别采用 CBL 教学法和 LBL 教学法，比较两组学生被试的理论知识考查成绩和问卷调查结果，根据数据类型的不同分别使用 T 检验和χ2检验分析比较两者的教学效果差异。结果两组学生的理论成绩无显著统计学差异；问卷调查结果显示学生对于 CBL 教学法在学习积极性、自学能力培养、临床思维能力培养、学习效率、课堂气氛、团结协作、综合素质培养等方面的评价均优于 LBL 组。结论CBL 教学法能更好地调动见习学生的学习主动性，培养学生独立思考和分析的能力，提高学生的临床综合技能，教学效果明显优于传统的 LBL 教学法。
목적：비교이안례위기출적교학법（CBL）화이강수위기출적교학법（LBL）재비뇨외과림상견습학생중적교학효과。방법장재비뇨외과견습적학생수궤분위 CBL 조화 LBL 조，분별채용 CBL 교학법화 LBL 교학법，비교량조학생피시적이론지식고사성적화문권조사결과，근거수거류형적불동분별사용 T 검험화χ2검험분석비교량자적교학효과차이。결과량조학생적이론성적무현저통계학차이；문권조사결과현시학생대우 CBL 교학법재학습적겁성、자학능력배양、림상사유능력배양、학습효솔、과당기분、단결협작、종합소질배양등방면적평개균우우 LBL 조。결론CBL 교학법능경호지조동견습학생적학습주동성，배양학생독립사고화분석적능력，제고학생적림상종합기능，교학효과명현우우전통적 LBL 교학법。
Objective To make a comparison of the teaching effects between case-based learning (CBL)method and lecture-based learning (LBL)method.Method All the students were divided into two groups randomly including CBL group and LBL group.Their test and questionnaire results were analyzed by using T test and Chi-square test according to the different da-ta types.Results There are no statistical differences between the two groups in their test scores,but the CBL group make a better evaluation than LBL group in the following aspects:study enthusiasm,self-study and clinical thinking ability cultiva-tion,learning efficiency,class atmosphere,cooperation and comprehensive quality development.Conclusion In the cultiva-tion of the students'learning initiative and their independent thinking and clinical analyzing ability,and the improvement of their clinical skills,CBL method is better than LBL method.