中华预防医学杂志
中華預防醫學雜誌
중화예방의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF
2015年
3期
237-242
,共6页
袁俊%谢朝军%刘于飞%马晓薇%蔡文锋%刘艳慧%刘建平%苏文哲%马钰
袁俊%謝朝軍%劉于飛%馬曉薇%蔡文鋒%劉豔慧%劉建平%囌文哲%馬鈺
원준%사조군%류우비%마효미%채문봉%류염혜%류건평%소문철%마옥
禽流感%家禽产品%集中屠宰%活禽市场
禽流感%傢禽產品%集中屠宰%活禽市場
금류감%가금산품%집중도재%활금시장
Influenza in birds%Poultry products%Central slaughtering%Live poultry markets
目的 分析广州市居民对永久实施活禽全市集中屠宰形式的接受意愿及其影响因素.方法 于2014年1月6-8日,采用Mitofsky-Waksberg二阶段抽样方法,选取广州市拥有固定电话的家庭中≥15岁、听力正常的居民为调查对象,共358名,通过公共卫生公益热线对其进行电话问卷调查.了解居民对永久实施活禽全市集中屠宰的接受意愿.通过计算科恩效应量参数(w),比较调查对象与2010年广州市人口普查数据人口学特征的差异,并对性别、年龄特征进行加权调整.采用x2检验比较不同特征因素调查对象对永久实施活禽全市集中屠宰形式的接受情况,采用多因素logistic回归分析影响居民接受意愿的因素.结果 358名调查对象的性别、年龄与2010年广州市人口普查数据差别较小(w分别为0.13、0.28);调查对象教育程度与婚姻状况与2010年广州市人口普查数据差别较大(w分别为0.52、0.31).永久实施活禽全市集中屠宰形式的接受率为49.0％ (95％ CI:43.7％ ～54.3％).过去1年内,买过光禽、冰鲜禽、冰冻禽的调查对象对永久实施全市集中屠宰形式的接受率分别为54.3％(133/245)、60.0％(57/95),59.8％(49/82),分别高于未买过光禽、冰鲜禽、冰冻禽者的接受率[38.1％ (43/113)、44.9％(118/263)、45.7％(126/276)](x2值分别为8.15、6.40、5.03,P值分别为0.004、0.011、0.025);认为冰鲜禽比活禽口感更好的调查对象对永久实施活禽全市集中屠宰接受率为64.9％(24/38),高于认为口感不好接受率[47.0％ (151/320)](x2=4.22,P =0.040).男性、认为因市场购买活禽会导致感染生病、接受市场仅供应光禽、近1年家庭购买过活禽、若无活禽供应会减少购买禽类的调查对象对永久实施全市集中屠宰形式的接受率分别为58.6％(109/186)、59.0％(92/156)、60.7 ％(139/230)、44.9％ (132/295)、36.6％ (68/186),其OR(95％ CI)值分别为2.68(1.64～4.37)、1.72(1.05 ～2.82)、2.39(1.33 ～4.30)、0.29(0.11 ～0.74)、0.50(0.30 ～0.83).结论 广州市人感染H7N9禽流感疫情前期,永久实施全市集中屠宰的接受率仍不高;男性、认为因市场购买活禽会导致感染发病者、能接受市场仅光禽供应者接受永久实施全市集中屠宰形式可能性较高.
目的 分析廣州市居民對永久實施活禽全市集中屠宰形式的接受意願及其影響因素.方法 于2014年1月6-8日,採用Mitofsky-Waksberg二階段抽樣方法,選取廣州市擁有固定電話的傢庭中≥15歲、聽力正常的居民為調查對象,共358名,通過公共衛生公益熱線對其進行電話問捲調查.瞭解居民對永久實施活禽全市集中屠宰的接受意願.通過計算科恩效應量參數(w),比較調查對象與2010年廣州市人口普查數據人口學特徵的差異,併對性彆、年齡特徵進行加權調整.採用x2檢驗比較不同特徵因素調查對象對永久實施活禽全市集中屠宰形式的接受情況,採用多因素logistic迴歸分析影響居民接受意願的因素.結果 358名調查對象的性彆、年齡與2010年廣州市人口普查數據差彆較小(w分彆為0.13、0.28);調查對象教育程度與婚姻狀況與2010年廣州市人口普查數據差彆較大(w分彆為0.52、0.31).永久實施活禽全市集中屠宰形式的接受率為49.0％ (95％ CI:43.7％ ～54.3％).過去1年內,買過光禽、冰鮮禽、冰凍禽的調查對象對永久實施全市集中屠宰形式的接受率分彆為54.3％(133/245)、60.0％(57/95),59.8％(49/82),分彆高于未買過光禽、冰鮮禽、冰凍禽者的接受率[38.1％ (43/113)、44.9％(118/263)、45.7％(126/276)](x2值分彆為8.15、6.40、5.03,P值分彆為0.004、0.011、0.025);認為冰鮮禽比活禽口感更好的調查對象對永久實施活禽全市集中屠宰接受率為64.9％(24/38),高于認為口感不好接受率[47.0％ (151/320)](x2=4.22,P =0.040).男性、認為因市場購買活禽會導緻感染生病、接受市場僅供應光禽、近1年傢庭購買過活禽、若無活禽供應會減少購買禽類的調查對象對永久實施全市集中屠宰形式的接受率分彆為58.6％(109/186)、59.0％(92/156)、60.7 ％(139/230)、44.9％ (132/295)、36.6％ (68/186),其OR(95％ CI)值分彆為2.68(1.64～4.37)、1.72(1.05 ～2.82)、2.39(1.33 ～4.30)、0.29(0.11 ～0.74)、0.50(0.30 ～0.83).結論 廣州市人感染H7N9禽流感疫情前期,永久實施全市集中屠宰的接受率仍不高;男性、認為因市場購買活禽會導緻感染髮病者、能接受市場僅光禽供應者接受永久實施全市集中屠宰形式可能性較高.
목적 분석엄주시거민대영구실시활금전시집중도재형식적접수의원급기영향인소.방법 우2014년1월6-8일,채용Mitofsky-Waksberg이계단추양방법,선취엄주시옹유고정전화적가정중≥15세、은력정상적거민위조사대상,공358명,통과공공위생공익열선대기진행전화문권조사.료해거민대영구실시활금전시집중도재적접수의원.통과계산과은효응량삼수(w),비교조사대상여2010년엄주시인구보사수거인구학특정적차이,병대성별、년령특정진행가권조정.채용x2검험비교불동특정인소조사대상대영구실시활금전시집중도재형식적접수정황,채용다인소logistic회귀분석영향거민접수의원적인소.결과 358명조사대상적성별、년령여2010년엄주시인구보사수거차별교소(w분별위0.13、0.28);조사대상교육정도여혼인상황여2010년엄주시인구보사수거차별교대(w분별위0.52、0.31).영구실시활금전시집중도재형식적접수솔위49.0％ (95％ CI:43.7％ ～54.3％).과거1년내,매과광금、빙선금、빙동금적조사대상대영구실시전시집중도재형식적접수솔분별위54.3％(133/245)、60.0％(57/95),59.8％(49/82),분별고우미매과광금、빙선금、빙동금자적접수솔[38.1％ (43/113)、44.9％(118/263)、45.7％(126/276)](x2치분별위8.15、6.40、5.03,P치분별위0.004、0.011、0.025);인위빙선금비활금구감경호적조사대상대영구실시활금전시집중도재접수솔위64.9％(24/38),고우인위구감불호접수솔[47.0％ (151/320)](x2=4.22,P =0.040).남성、인위인시장구매활금회도치감염생병、접수시장부공응광금、근1년가정구매과활금、약무활금공응회감소구매금류적조사대상대영구실시전시집중도재형식적접수솔분별위58.6％(109/186)、59.0％(92/156)、60.7 ％(139/230)、44.9％ (132/295)、36.6％ (68/186),기OR(95％ CI)치분별위2.68(1.64～4.37)、1.72(1.05 ～2.82)、2.39(1.33 ～4.30)、0.29(0.11 ～0.74)、0.50(0.30 ～0.83).결론 엄주시인감염H7N9금류감역정전기,영구실시전시집중도재적접수솔잉불고;남성、인위인시장구매활금회도치감염발병자、능접수시장부광금공응자접수영구실시전시집중도재형식가능성교고.
Objective To investigate a survey about acceptance of central slaughtering of live poultry in residents of Guangzhou.Methods We conducted a telephone survey by sampling residents with fixed-line telephone and with normal hearing,whose age is more than 15 years,by Mitofsky-Waksberg two-stage method during Jan 6th to 8th,2014.358 residents finished the telephone questionnaire by 12 320 health hot line.We investigated the acceptance rate of city-wide central slaughtering permanently.We compared the difference between the respondents and the 2010 Guangzhou census data by Cohen's effect sizes(w) and weighted by population age and sex.We used x2 test to compare the acceptance rate of central slaughtering in residents with different characteristic.We used multiple logistic regression analysis to analyze the factors.Results The difference in gender and age was small between respondents and the 2010 Guangzhou census data (w value was 0.13,0.28,respectively),but that in education and marital status was large (w value was 0.52,0.31,respectively).49.0％ (95％ CI:43.7％-54.3％) accept city-wide central slaughtering permanently.The acceptance rate of city-wide central slaughtering permanently in those who bought fresh,chilled and frozen poultry in their family in previous year was 54.3％ (133/245),60.0％ (57/ 95) and 59.8％ (49/82),respectively.It was more than those who didn't buy fresh,chilled and frozen poultry (38.1％ (43/113),44.9％ (118/263) and 45.7％ (126/276);x2 values were 8.15,6.40 and 5.03;P values were 0.004,0.011 and 0.025,respectively).The acceptance rate of city-wide central slaughtering permanently in those who deem fresh poultry taste better than live poultry was 64.9％ (24/38).It more than those who deem not (47.0％,151/320) (x2 =4.22,6.02,P =0.040,0.014,respectively).The acceptance rate of city-wide central slaughtering permanently in the male(OR =2.68,95％ CI:1.64-4.37) and those who deem getting sick due to buying live birds from LPM(OR =1.72,95％ CI:1.05-2.82),who can accept only fresh poultry carcass supply(OR =2.39,95％ CI:1.33-4.30),Who bought live poultry in their family in previous year(OR =0.29,95％ CI:0.11-0.74),who will decrease the consumption after ban on live poultry sale (OR =0.50,95％ CI:O.30-0.83) was 58.6％ (109/186),59.0％ (92/156),60.7％ (139/230),44.9％ (132/295),36.6％ (68/186),respectively.Conclusion In the early stage of avian influenza A (H7N9) epidemic in Guangzhou,the rate of acceptance of central slaughtering permanently in residents was not so high.Who deem getting sick due to buying live birds from LPM,who could accept only fresh poultry carcass supply and the male more accept city-wide central slaughtering permanently.
