中国医学创新
中國醫學創新
중국의학창신
MEDICAL INNOVATION OF CHINA
2015年
14期
31-33
,共3页
退行性膝关节炎%超激光治疗仪%疼痛%疗效
退行性膝關節炎%超激光治療儀%疼痛%療效
퇴행성슬관절염%초격광치료의%동통%료효
Degenerative arthritis of the knee%Super lizer%Pain%Efficacy
目的：探讨临床上应用超激光疼痛治疗仪治疗退行性膝关节炎患者的疗效。方法：选择2011年10月-2014年10月本院收治的86例退行性膝关节炎患者，将患者随机分为两组，每组各43例，对照组在常规理疗、保护膝关节治疗基础上给予非甾体类抗炎治疗，试验组在常规治疗基础上给予超激光疼痛治疗仪治疗。比较两组治疗效果、膝关节功能情况及疼痛缓解情况。结果：试验组总有效率为90.69%，对照组为72.09%，试验组优于对照组，组间比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；治疗前两组患者的疼痛评分比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；治疗后试验组患者的疼痛评分明显低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；两组患者治疗前HSS评分及WOMAC评分比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；治疗后两组患者的HSS评分及WOMAC评分均较治疗前明显改善，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05），但试验组患者的HSS评分及WOMAC评分明显优于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：应用超级光疼痛治疗仪的方案治疗退行性膝关节炎，止痛效果明显，促进患者膝关节功能的恢复，有着重要的临床参考意义。
目的：探討臨床上應用超激光疼痛治療儀治療退行性膝關節炎患者的療效。方法：選擇2011年10月-2014年10月本院收治的86例退行性膝關節炎患者，將患者隨機分為兩組，每組各43例，對照組在常規理療、保護膝關節治療基礎上給予非甾體類抗炎治療，試驗組在常規治療基礎上給予超激光疼痛治療儀治療。比較兩組治療效果、膝關節功能情況及疼痛緩解情況。結果：試驗組總有效率為90.69%，對照組為72.09%，試驗組優于對照組，組間比較差異有統計學意義（P<0.05）；治療前兩組患者的疼痛評分比較差異無統計學意義（P>0.05）；治療後試驗組患者的疼痛評分明顯低于對照組，差異有統計學意義（P<0.05）；兩組患者治療前HSS評分及WOMAC評分比較差異無統計學意義（P>0.05）；治療後兩組患者的HSS評分及WOMAC評分均較治療前明顯改善，差異有統計學意義（P<0.05），但試驗組患者的HSS評分及WOMAC評分明顯優于對照組，差異有統計學意義（P<0.05）。結論：應用超級光疼痛治療儀的方案治療退行性膝關節炎，止痛效果明顯，促進患者膝關節功能的恢複，有著重要的臨床參攷意義。
목적：탐토림상상응용초격광동통치료의치료퇴행성슬관절염환자적료효。방법：선택2011년10월-2014년10월본원수치적86례퇴행성슬관절염환자，장환자수궤분위량조，매조각43례，대조조재상규리료、보호슬관절치료기출상급여비치체류항염치료，시험조재상규치료기출상급여초격광동통치료의치료。비교량조치료효과、슬관절공능정황급동통완해정황。결과：시험조총유효솔위90.69%，대조조위72.09%，시험조우우대조조，조간비교차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）；치료전량조환자적동통평분비교차이무통계학의의（P>0.05）；치료후시험조환자적동통평분명현저우대조조，차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）；량조환자치료전HSS평분급WOMAC평분비교차이무통계학의의（P>0.05）；치료후량조환자적HSS평분급WOMAC평분균교치료전명현개선，차이유통계학의의（P<0.05），단시험조환자적HSS평분급WOMAC평분명현우우대조조，차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론：응용초급광동통치료의적방안치료퇴행성슬관절염，지통효과명현，촉진환자슬관절공능적회복，유착중요적림상삼고의의。
Objective:To investigate the efficiency of clinical application of super-lizer treatment for patients with degenerative osteoarthritis of the knee.Method:86 patients with degenerative arthritis of the knee were selected from October 2011 to October 2014 in our hospital, these 86 patients were randomly divided into control group and experimental group,43 cases in each group.The control group was treated with conventional therapy,given non-steroidal anti-inflammatory therapy based on treatment of protecting the knee, and experimental group was given super lizer treatment based on conventional treatment.The treatment effect, knee function and pain remission of patients in the two groups were compared.Result: The total effective rate of the experimental group was 90.69%, the total effective rate was 72.09% in the control group, the experimental group was better than the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05);before treatment,the pain scores of two group of patients was no statistically significant difference(P>0.05); after treatment, patients’ pain score in the experimental group was significantly lower than the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05); before treatment, there was no significantly significant difference between two groups of patients at HSS Compare ratings and WOMAC scores(P>0.05); after treatment, in both groups, the HSS score and WOMAC scores improved significantly compared with before treatment, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05), but the HSS score and WOMAC scores of experiment group of patients were significantly better than the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion: Applying super lizer treatment programs in patients with degenerative arthritis of the knee, the analgesic effect is significant, it can promote the recovery of patients with knee function, and has important clinical reference value.
