中国医药
中國醫藥
중국의약
CHINA MEDICINE
2015年
5期
661-663
,共3页
彭小乐%李宏芹%金大庆%王建云%尹彦%杨威
彭小樂%李宏芹%金大慶%王建雲%尹彥%楊威
팽소악%리굉근%금대경%왕건운%윤언%양위
胸部外伤%胸腔镜%开胸手术
胸部外傷%胸腔鏡%開胸手術
흉부외상%흉강경%개흉수술
Chest trauma%Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery%Thoracotomy
目的 探讨胸腔镜与开胸手术治疗胸部外伤的效果.方法 选取2004年1月至2013年12月北京市平谷区医院收治的胸部外伤合并血气胸患者113例,患者入院时无严重失血性休克表现.根据手术方式将患者分成胸腔镜组(40例)及开胸组(73例).胸腔镜组采用完全胸腔镜治疗,开胸组采用开胸探查术.比较2组患者损伤部位、术中出血量、输血量、手术时间、呼吸机使用情况、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间、总住院时间、围术期病死率和住院费用.结果 2组患者损伤部位、术中出血量及输血量、手术时间、ICU住院时间、住院费用、呼吸机使用情况比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).胸腔镜组无死亡病例;开胸组1例死亡,死亡原因为术后肺栓塞.胸腔镜组总住院时间明显短于开胸组[(15±9)d比(20±14)d],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).所有拟行胸腔镜手术中有4例中转开胸,40例完成胸腔镜手术.中转开胸患者术中出血量明显高于胸腔镜组[(2 375±750) ml比(1 089 ±519)ml],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 胸腔镜手术与开胸手术比较,具有ICU住院时间及总住院时间短、恢复快的特点.胸腔镜手术中遇到出血难以控制时,应尽早开胸处理.
目的 探討胸腔鏡與開胸手術治療胸部外傷的效果.方法 選取2004年1月至2013年12月北京市平穀區醫院收治的胸部外傷閤併血氣胸患者113例,患者入院時無嚴重失血性休剋錶現.根據手術方式將患者分成胸腔鏡組(40例)及開胸組(73例).胸腔鏡組採用完全胸腔鏡治療,開胸組採用開胸探查術.比較2組患者損傷部位、術中齣血量、輸血量、手術時間、呼吸機使用情況、重癥鑑護病房(ICU)住院時間、總住院時間、圍術期病死率和住院費用.結果 2組患者損傷部位、術中齣血量及輸血量、手術時間、ICU住院時間、住院費用、呼吸機使用情況比較,差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05).胸腔鏡組無死亡病例;開胸組1例死亡,死亡原因為術後肺栓塞.胸腔鏡組總住院時間明顯短于開胸組[(15±9)d比(20±14)d],差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).所有擬行胸腔鏡手術中有4例中轉開胸,40例完成胸腔鏡手術.中轉開胸患者術中齣血量明顯高于胸腔鏡組[(2 375±750) ml比(1 089 ±519)ml],差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論 胸腔鏡手術與開胸手術比較,具有ICU住院時間及總住院時間短、恢複快的特點.胸腔鏡手術中遇到齣血難以控製時,應儘早開胸處理.
목적 탐토흉강경여개흉수술치료흉부외상적효과.방법 선취2004년1월지2013년12월북경시평곡구의원수치적흉부외상합병혈기흉환자113례,환자입원시무엄중실혈성휴극표현.근거수술방식장환자분성흉강경조(40례)급개흉조(73례).흉강경조채용완전흉강경치료,개흉조채용개흉탐사술.비교2조환자손상부위、술중출혈량、수혈량、수술시간、호흡궤사용정황、중증감호병방(ICU)주원시간、총주원시간、위술기병사솔화주원비용.결과 2조환자손상부위、술중출혈량급수혈량、수술시간、ICU주원시간、주원비용、호흡궤사용정황비교,차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05).흉강경조무사망병례;개흉조1례사망,사망원인위술후폐전새.흉강경조총주원시간명현단우개흉조[(15±9)d비(20±14)d],차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).소유의행흉강경수술중유4례중전개흉,40례완성흉강경수술.중전개흉환자술중출혈량명현고우흉강경조[(2 375±750) ml비(1 089 ±519)ml],차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론 흉강경수술여개흉수술비교,구유ICU주원시간급총주원시간단、회복쾌적특점.흉강경수술중우도출혈난이공제시,응진조개흉처리.
Objective To compare the efficacy of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and traditional thoracotomy in treatment of chest trauma.Methods One hundred and thirteen patients who suffered from chest trauma complicated with hemopneumothorax from January 2004 to December 2013 were retrospectively reviewed.The patients were divided into VATS group (40 cases) and thoracotomy group (73 cases).The injured site,blood loss,volume of blood transfusion,operation time,use of ventilator,time in the intensive care unit (ICU),hospitalization time,perioperative mortality rate and hospitalization expense were compared between the two groups.Results No statistical differences were found between the two groups regarding injured site,operation time,blood loss,volume of blood transfusion,time in the ICU,use of ventilator and hospitalization expense (all P > 0.05).There was no death in VATS group and 1 case died from postoperative pulmonary embolism in thoracotomy group.VATS group had a shorter hospitalization time compared with thoracotomy group [(15 ± 9) d vs (20 ± 14) d,P <0.05].The VATS was converted to thoracotomy during the operation in 4 cases,who had more blood loss compared with VATS group [(2 375 ± 750) ml vs (1 089 ± 519) ml,P < 0.05],that was 40 patients completed the VATS (P < 0.05).Conclusions Compared with thoracotomy,VATS provides shorter operationtime,shorter ICU stay time and quicker recovery in treatment of chest trauma.VATS should be converted to thoracotomy as soon as possible when the bleeding is hard to control.