求是学刊
求是學刊
구시학간
SEEKING TRUTH
2015年
3期
94-101
,共8页
美国%强制执行%补充程序%债权人诉讼%询问债务人听证
美國%彊製執行%補充程序%債權人訴訟%詢問債務人聽證
미국%강제집행%보충정서%채권인소송%순문채무인은증
America%Law Enforcement%Supplementary proceedings%Creditor’s bill%Debtor Examina-tion Hearing
美国强制执行中的补充程序,植根于衡平法,诞生之初就被赋予了替代债权人诉讼之责。其主要功能是发现判决债务人的财产,将不适用于执行令程序的衡平法上的财产利益用于金钱判决的给付和取消欺诈性财产转让。该程序主体由询问债务人听证和法院的命令两部分组成,内部诸要素之间各司其职、相辅相成,推动金钱判决的整个强制执行程序有效运行。该程序注重发掘当事人各方的潜力,事半功倍地解决查找判决债务人财产的关键问题;兼顾判决债务人及相关第三人的权益保障;富有灵活性,能更好地应对复杂多变的实际情况。这些都对我国强制执行法的制定具有一定的借鉴意义。
美國彊製執行中的補充程序,植根于衡平法,誕生之初就被賦予瞭替代債權人訴訟之責。其主要功能是髮現判決債務人的財產,將不適用于執行令程序的衡平法上的財產利益用于金錢判決的給付和取消欺詐性財產轉讓。該程序主體由詢問債務人聽證和法院的命令兩部分組成,內部諸要素之間各司其職、相輔相成,推動金錢判決的整箇彊製執行程序有效運行。該程序註重髮掘噹事人各方的潛力,事半功倍地解決查找判決債務人財產的關鍵問題;兼顧判決債務人及相關第三人的權益保障;富有靈活性,能更好地應對複雜多變的實際情況。這些都對我國彊製執行法的製定具有一定的藉鑒意義。
미국강제집행중적보충정서,식근우형평법,탄생지초취피부여료체대채권인소송지책。기주요공능시발현판결채무인적재산,장불괄용우집행령정서적형평법상적재산이익용우금전판결적급부화취소기사성재산전양。해정서주체유순문채무인은증화법원적명령량부분조성,내부제요소지간각사기직、상보상성,추동금전판결적정개강제집행정서유효운행。해정서주중발굴당사인각방적잠력,사반공배지해결사조판결채무인재산적관건문제;겸고판결채무인급상관제삼인적권익보장;부유령활성,능경호지응대복잡다변적실제정황。저사도대아국강제집행법적제정구유일정적차감의의。
The supplementary proceedings in the American judgment enforcement system derive from the equity, and are being empowered to replace creditor’s bill since they come into existence. Con?centrating on the discovery of the debtors’properties, the supplementary proceedings enable the equi?table interests, which are not applicable to execution, to satisfy the money judgment, and are also able to set aside the fraudulent transfer. The main body of the supplementary proceedings consist of two parts, debtor examination hearing and court’s order, and as their internal coherent elements per?form respective duties independently and interdependently, they push forward the effective operation of the overall judgment enforcement. The focus of the proceedings on driving the parties’potentials yields twice the results of how to locate debtors’properties. Overseeing the debtors and the 3rd par?ties’ interest protection notwithstanding, the proceedings also manifest flexibility and therefore tackle complexity and changes effectively. As mentioned above, the proceedings serve as useful exemplary reference for the creation of our judgment enforcement system.