实用医学杂志
實用醫學雜誌
실용의학잡지
THE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL MEDICINE
2015年
7期
1065-1068
,共4页
刘怀鄂%游晶%陈红英%范晶华%刘华%张茹薏%饶少锋%马思佳
劉懷鄂%遊晶%陳紅英%範晶華%劉華%張茹薏%饒少鋒%馬思佳
류부악%유정%진홍영%범정화%류화%장여의%요소봉%마사가
肝炎,乙型,慢性%拉米夫定%阿德福韦酯%联合治疗
肝炎,乙型,慢性%拉米伕定%阿德福韋酯%聯閤治療
간염,을형,만성%랍미부정%아덕복위지%연합치료
Hepatitis B,chronic%Lamivudine%Adefovir%Combination therapy
目的:观察初始拉米夫定(LAM)和阿德福韦酯(ADV)联合与 LAM、恩替卡韦(ETV)单药治疗基因B/C型HBeAg (+)慢性乙型肝炎(慢乙肝)患者的疗效。方法:招募182例符合中国慢乙肝防治指南中治疗标准的基因 B/C 型 HBeAg (+)慢乙肝初始治疗患者,随机分为3组,分别以 LAM 和 ADV 联合、LAM 或ETV单药治疗48周,观察疗效。结果:基线水平无差异的3组患者分别经过3种方案治疗后,联合治疗组生化学应答率(12周P <0.01,24周P <0.01,48周P <0.01)、HBeAg 血清学应答率(12周P <0.01,24周P <0.05,48周P <0.05)、完全病毒学应答率(12周 P <0.05,24周 P <0.05,48周 P <0.05)均高于 LAM组。联合治疗组在生化学应答方面较ETV组存在一定优势。结论:LAM和ADV初始联合治疗是我国以B/C型基因为主的慢乙肝患者抗病毒治疗的优良策略。
目的:觀察初始拉米伕定(LAM)和阿德福韋酯(ADV)聯閤與 LAM、恩替卡韋(ETV)單藥治療基因B/C型HBeAg (+)慢性乙型肝炎(慢乙肝)患者的療效。方法:招募182例符閤中國慢乙肝防治指南中治療標準的基因 B/C 型 HBeAg (+)慢乙肝初始治療患者,隨機分為3組,分彆以 LAM 和 ADV 聯閤、LAM 或ETV單藥治療48週,觀察療效。結果:基線水平無差異的3組患者分彆經過3種方案治療後,聯閤治療組生化學應答率(12週P <0.01,24週P <0.01,48週P <0.01)、HBeAg 血清學應答率(12週P <0.01,24週P <0.05,48週P <0.05)、完全病毒學應答率(12週 P <0.05,24週 P <0.05,48週 P <0.05)均高于 LAM組。聯閤治療組在生化學應答方麵較ETV組存在一定優勢。結論:LAM和ADV初始聯閤治療是我國以B/C型基因為主的慢乙肝患者抗病毒治療的優良策略。
목적:관찰초시랍미부정(LAM)화아덕복위지(ADV)연합여 LAM、은체잡위(ETV)단약치료기인B/C형HBeAg (+)만성을형간염(만을간)환자적료효。방법:초모182례부합중국만을간방치지남중치료표준적기인 B/C 형 HBeAg (+)만을간초시치료환자,수궤분위3조,분별이 LAM 화 ADV 연합、LAM 혹ETV단약치료48주,관찰료효。결과:기선수평무차이적3조환자분별경과3충방안치료후,연합치료조생화학응답솔(12주P <0.01,24주P <0.01,48주P <0.01)、HBeAg 혈청학응답솔(12주P <0.01,24주P <0.05,48주P <0.05)、완전병독학응답솔(12주 P <0.05,24주 P <0.05,48주 P <0.05)균고우 LAM조。연합치료조재생화학응답방면교ETV조존재일정우세。결론:LAM화ADV초시연합치료시아국이B/C형기인위주적만을간환자항병독치료적우량책략。
Objective To observe the efficacy of de novo combination therapy lamivudine plus adefovir , lamivudine monotherapy and entecavir monotherapy in HBeAg-positive CHB patients with genotype B/C. Methods A total of 182 treatment-naive CHB patients in line with treatment standards of Chinese CHB prevention and treatment guidelines were randomly assigned to three groups and treated with lamivudine plus adefovir or lamivudine monotherapy or entecavir monotherapy for 48 weeks. Results Patients in three groups presented no difference in baseline levels. After treatment by three therapies , the group of lamivudine plus adefovir showed a higher biochemical response rates (12 week P < 0.01, 24 week P < 0.01, 48 week P < 0.01), HBeAg-serological rates(12 week P < 0.01, 24 week P < 0.05, 48 week P < 0.05) and completely virological response rates (12 week P < 0.05, 24 week P < 0.05, 48 week P < 0.05) than lamivudine group. In terms of biochemical response rates , the group of lamivudine plus adefovir had certain advantages when compared with entecavir group. Conclusion De novo combination therapy lamivudine plus adefovir is a good antiviral strategy for chronic hepatitis B patients with B/C genotype viral infection in China.