实用医学杂志
實用醫學雜誌
실용의학잡지
THE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL MEDICINE
2015年
7期
1053-1056,1057
,共5页
叶晓光%欧阳仁杰
葉曉光%歐暘仁傑
협효광%구양인걸
肝炎,乙型,慢性%药物经济学%Markov模型%成本效果
肝炎,乙型,慢性%藥物經濟學%Markov模型%成本效果
간염,을형,만성%약물경제학%Markov모형%성본효과
Hepatitis B,chronic%Pharmacoeconomics%Markov model%Cost-effectiveness
目的:对替比夫定优化方案与恩替卡韦方案治疗HBeAg 阳性慢性乙型肝炎进行药物经济学评价。方法:根据慢性乙型肝炎进展规律,构建含多个健康状态的Markov模型,以替比夫定单药方案作基准,估计替比夫定优化方案与恩替卡韦方案治疗 HBeAg 阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者的长期效果和医疗费用,并进行增量分析。结果:使用恩替卡韦方案使 HBeAg 阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者获得35.95年的期望生存年和22.94个质量调整生命年,其总费用为349279.27元,每延长1个质量调整生命年多需的医疗费用为15225.77元。使用替比夫定优化方案获得了长于恩替卡韦方案的36.11年的期望生存年和23.08个质量调整生命年,其总费用为348863.62元,每延长1个质量调整生命年多需的医疗费用为15115.41元,低于恩替卡韦方案的15225.77元。结论:使用替比夫定优化方案相比恩替卡韦方案具有略优的成本效果,可以作为临床上HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎抗病毒治疗的较优选择。
目的:對替比伕定優化方案與恩替卡韋方案治療HBeAg 暘性慢性乙型肝炎進行藥物經濟學評價。方法:根據慢性乙型肝炎進展規律,構建含多箇健康狀態的Markov模型,以替比伕定單藥方案作基準,估計替比伕定優化方案與恩替卡韋方案治療 HBeAg 暘性慢性乙型肝炎患者的長期效果和醫療費用,併進行增量分析。結果:使用恩替卡韋方案使 HBeAg 暘性慢性乙型肝炎患者穫得35.95年的期望生存年和22.94箇質量調整生命年,其總費用為349279.27元,每延長1箇質量調整生命年多需的醫療費用為15225.77元。使用替比伕定優化方案穫得瞭長于恩替卡韋方案的36.11年的期望生存年和23.08箇質量調整生命年,其總費用為348863.62元,每延長1箇質量調整生命年多需的醫療費用為15115.41元,低于恩替卡韋方案的15225.77元。結論:使用替比伕定優化方案相比恩替卡韋方案具有略優的成本效果,可以作為臨床上HBeAg暘性慢性乙型肝炎抗病毒治療的較優選擇。
목적:대체비부정우화방안여은체잡위방안치료HBeAg 양성만성을형간염진행약물경제학평개。방법:근거만성을형간염진전규률,구건함다개건강상태적Markov모형,이체비부정단약방안작기준,고계체비부정우화방안여은체잡위방안치료 HBeAg 양성만성을형간염환자적장기효과화의료비용,병진행증량분석。결과:사용은체잡위방안사 HBeAg 양성만성을형간염환자획득35.95년적기망생존년화22.94개질량조정생명년,기총비용위349279.27원,매연장1개질량조정생명년다수적의료비용위15225.77원。사용체비부정우화방안획득료장우은체잡위방안적36.11년적기망생존년화23.08개질량조정생명년,기총비용위348863.62원,매연장1개질량조정생명년다수적의료비용위15115.41원,저우은체잡위방안적15225.77원。결론:사용체비부정우화방안상비은체잡위방안구유략우적성본효과,가이작위림상상HBeAg양성만성을형간염항병독치료적교우선택。
Objective To compare the cost-effectiveness of telbivudine-based optimization treatment and entecavir monotherapy in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods A Markov model for disease progression of CHB was constructed and cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to estimate their long-term effects and medical costs. Results There were 36.11 expected life years (ELYs) and 23.08 quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained from treatment with telbivudine optimization, which were longer than 35.95 ELYs and 23.08 QALYs from entecavir treatment. The total cost of telbivudine optimization was 348 863.62 yuan and that of entecavir treatment 349 279.27 yuan. Each extension of a QALYs required for medical expenses of 15 115.41 yuan in telvivudine optimization, which was cheaper than that in entecavir treatment with 15 225.77 yuan. Conclusions Telbivudine-based optimization treatment shows good cost-effectiveness than entecavir monotherapy. Telbivudine-based optimization treatment can be used as the optimum choice for antiviral therapy in CHB.