中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2015年
12期
1368-1371
,共4页
护理%急救%问卷调查%信度%效度
護理%急救%問捲調查%信度%效度
호리%급구%문권조사%신도%효도
Nursing%First-aid%Questionnaires%Reliability%Validity
目的:编制适合我国护理管理者评估临床护理人员急救能力的测评工具。方法在文献回顾的基础上,结合国内外相关研究及小范围专家论证,初步拟定量表维度及条目。通过Delphi法专家咨询对初拟量表修订后形成预测量表,并采用他评方式对170名临床护理人员进行预测试,形成正式测评量表;随后采用此量表对350名临床护理人员进行大样本测试、项目分析及信、效度检验,形成最终量表。结果临床护理人员急救能力测评工具由8个维度32个条目组成,总量表的Cronbach′s α系数为0.85,分半信度是0.74,重测信度是0.89。结论编制的测评量表具有较好的信度和效度,既可为护理管理者评价临床护理人员的急救能力提供依据,又可为临床有针对性地培训护理人员急救能力提供参考。
目的:編製適閤我國護理管理者評估臨床護理人員急救能力的測評工具。方法在文獻迴顧的基礎上,結閤國內外相關研究及小範圍專傢論證,初步擬定量錶維度及條目。通過Delphi法專傢咨詢對初擬量錶脩訂後形成預測量錶,併採用他評方式對170名臨床護理人員進行預測試,形成正式測評量錶;隨後採用此量錶對350名臨床護理人員進行大樣本測試、項目分析及信、效度檢驗,形成最終量錶。結果臨床護理人員急救能力測評工具由8箇維度32箇條目組成,總量錶的Cronbach′s α繫數為0.85,分半信度是0.74,重測信度是0.89。結論編製的測評量錶具有較好的信度和效度,既可為護理管理者評價臨床護理人員的急救能力提供依據,又可為臨床有針對性地培訓護理人員急救能力提供參攷。
목적:편제괄합아국호리관리자평고림상호리인원급구능력적측평공구。방법재문헌회고적기출상,결합국내외상관연구급소범위전가론증,초보의정량표유도급조목。통과Delphi법전가자순대초의량표수정후형성예측량표,병채용타평방식대170명림상호리인원진행예측시,형성정식측평량표;수후채용차량표대350명림상호리인원진행대양본측시、항목분석급신、효도검험,형성최종량표。결과림상호리인원급구능력측평공구유8개유도32개조목조성,총량표적Cronbach′s α계수위0.85,분반신도시0.74,중측신도시0.89。결론편제적측평량표구유교호적신도화효도,기가위호리관리자평개림상호리인원적급구능력제공의거,우가위림상유침대성지배훈호리인원급구능력제공삼고。
Objective To compile the measuring instrument for Chinese nursing managers to evaluate the first-aid ability of clinical nursing staff. Methods Based on the literature review, dimensions and items were studied out by combing with the studies in domestic and abroad, and experts′ demonstration in a small range. The prognostic scale was formed on the basis of early scale by Delphi evaluation, and the formal scale was developed by the way that pretesting 170 clinical nursing staffs. Then using the scale conducted a great sample test, item analysis, reliability and validity for 350 clinical nursing staffs. Eventually, the scale came into being. Results The measuring instrument for the first-aid ability of clinical nursing staff consisted of 32 items, 8 domains. Its Cronbach′s α coefficient was 0. 85, and the split-half reliability was 0. 74, with a test-retest reliability of 0. 89. Conclusions The scale has a good reliability and validity. It cannot only provide a basis for nursing managers to evaluate the first-aid ability of clinical nursing staff accurately, but also provide a reference for clinical training.