中国中医药现代远程教育
中國中醫藥現代遠程教育
중국중의약현대원정교육
CHINESE MEDICINE MODERN DISTANCE EDUCATION OF CHINA
2015年
8期
54-55
,共2页
双黄连注射剂%青霉素%小儿支原体肺炎%安全性%儿科
雙黃連註射劑%青黴素%小兒支原體肺炎%安全性%兒科
쌍황련주사제%청매소%소인지원체폐염%안전성%인과
Shuanghuanglian injection%penicillin%infantile mycoplasmal pneumonia%safety%pediatrics
目的：探讨双黄连注射液与青霉素治疗小儿肺炎治疗的疗效差异及安全性，为选择合理的用药方案提供参考。方法选取2013年5月—2014年5月收治的78例肺炎患者作为研究对象，随机双盲法分为观察组和对照组，观察组给予双黄连液注射治疗，对照组口服青霉素治疗，记录并比较平均退热时间、咳嗽消失时间、啰音消失时间等差异，评价临床疗效。结果观察组平均退热时间、咳嗽消失时间、啰音消失时间均早于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。观察组治疗有效率为95.0%，对照组为92.1%，2组对比无显著性差异（P＞0.05）。结论对小儿肺炎用药来说，双黄连注射剂和青霉素均是良好的药物选择，但双黄连注射剂有利于提高预后恢复时间及质量，更具有推广应用价值。
目的：探討雙黃連註射液與青黴素治療小兒肺炎治療的療效差異及安全性，為選擇閤理的用藥方案提供參攷。方法選取2013年5月—2014年5月收治的78例肺炎患者作為研究對象，隨機雙盲法分為觀察組和對照組，觀察組給予雙黃連液註射治療，對照組口服青黴素治療，記錄併比較平均退熱時間、咳嗽消失時間、啰音消失時間等差異，評價臨床療效。結果觀察組平均退熱時間、咳嗽消失時間、啰音消失時間均早于對照組，差異均有統計學意義（P<0.05）。觀察組治療有效率為95.0%，對照組為92.1%，2組對比無顯著性差異（P＞0.05）。結論對小兒肺炎用藥來說，雙黃連註射劑和青黴素均是良好的藥物選擇，但雙黃連註射劑有利于提高預後恢複時間及質量，更具有推廣應用價值。
목적：탐토쌍황련주사액여청매소치료소인폐염치료적료효차이급안전성，위선택합리적용약방안제공삼고。방법선취2013년5월—2014년5월수치적78례폐염환자작위연구대상，수궤쌍맹법분위관찰조화대조조，관찰조급여쌍황련액주사치료，대조조구복청매소치료，기록병비교평균퇴열시간、해수소실시간、라음소실시간등차이，평개림상료효。결과관찰조평균퇴열시간、해수소실시간、라음소실시간균조우대조조，차이균유통계학의의（P<0.05）。관찰조치료유효솔위95.0%，대조조위92.1%，2조대비무현저성차이（P＞0.05）。결론대소인폐염용약래설，쌍황련주사제화청매소균시량호적약물선택，단쌍황련주사제유리우제고예후회복시간급질량，경구유추엄응용개치。
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of Shuanghuanglian injection and penicillin on the treatment of infantile pneumonia. Methods 78 cases of patients with pneumonia in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into the observation group and the control group. The observation group was given Shuanghuanglian injection therapy. The control group was given oral penicillin treatment. The average time of fever, cough disappeared time, rales disappeared time were recorded and compared. Results The average time of fever, cough disappeared time, rales disappearance time of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group, the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05) . The effective rate of treatment group was 95%, and was 92.1% for the control group, there was no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05) . Conclusion For the treatment of infantile pneumonia, Shuanghuanglian injection and penicillin are good medicine, while Shuanghuanglian injection is beneficial to improve prognosis and quali-ty of recovery time, and has the value of wide application.
