国家检察官学院学报
國傢檢察官學院學報
국가검찰관학원학보
JOURNAL OF NATIONAL PROCURATORS COLLEGE
2015年
3期
105-114,175
,共11页
非法证据%基础事实%推定事实%选择性录音录像%法律后果
非法證據%基礎事實%推定事實%選擇性錄音錄像%法律後果
비법증거%기출사실%추정사실%선택성록음록상%법률후과
Illegally Obtained Evidence%Foundation Facts%Presumption Facts%Selective Record-ing%Legal Consequences
讯问录音录像具有保障讯问活动规范实施和固定犯罪嫌疑人供述的双重功效,但实践中存在录音录像选择性录制和提供的困境。因此,必须对违反强制性录音录像要求所获供述的证据能力及审查、认定、排除程序等作出规范,以此来保证录音录像价值的实现。考虑到拒不提供录音录像与以刑讯逼供等非法方法收集证据之间的高伴生性关系,可以通过推定规则的设计来实现这一目的。讯问录音录像推定规则创制后,能够达到维护法律实施及其内在正当性、统一司法实践的裁判标准、促使讯问活动与录制过程严格依法、保障程序性裁判结论与实体性裁判结论的准确等多个目的。在适用推定规则时,要注意基础事实由法官依职权启动或由被告人举证、充分保障控诉方反驳的权利,同时对推定规则中争议事实及反驳事实设定科学的证明标准。
訊問錄音錄像具有保障訊問活動規範實施和固定犯罪嫌疑人供述的雙重功效,但實踐中存在錄音錄像選擇性錄製和提供的睏境。因此,必鬚對違反彊製性錄音錄像要求所穫供述的證據能力及審查、認定、排除程序等作齣規範,以此來保證錄音錄像價值的實現。攷慮到拒不提供錄音錄像與以刑訊逼供等非法方法收集證據之間的高伴生性關繫,可以通過推定規則的設計來實現這一目的。訊問錄音錄像推定規則創製後,能夠達到維護法律實施及其內在正噹性、統一司法實踐的裁判標準、促使訊問活動與錄製過程嚴格依法、保障程序性裁判結論與實體性裁判結論的準確等多箇目的。在適用推定規則時,要註意基礎事實由法官依職權啟動或由被告人舉證、充分保障控訴方反駁的權利,同時對推定規則中爭議事實及反駁事實設定科學的證明標準。
신문록음록상구유보장신문활동규범실시화고정범죄혐의인공술적쌍중공효,단실천중존재록음록상선택성록제화제공적곤경。인차,필수대위반강제성록음록상요구소획공술적증거능력급심사、인정、배제정서등작출규범,이차래보증록음록상개치적실현。고필도거불제공록음록상여이형신핍공등비법방법수집증거지간적고반생성관계,가이통과추정규칙적설계래실현저일목적。신문록음록상추정규칙창제후,능구체도유호법률실시급기내재정당성、통일사법실천적재판표준、촉사신문활동여록제과정엄격의법、보장정서성재판결론여실체성재판결론적준학등다개목적。재괄용추정규칙시,요주의기출사실유법관의직권계동혹유피고인거증、충분보장공소방반박적권리,동시대추정규칙중쟁의사실급반박사실설정과학적증명표준。
The interrogation of cases of duty crime and cases in which the suspect may sentenced to life imprison-ment and death, are legally required to record.While interrogation recording is effective in both making sure the interrogation goes correctly and fixing suspects confession, it still confronts the problem of recording and providing selectively.The evidence ability, review, confirmation and exclusion of statement that vio-late compulsory recording rules should be defined to ensure the value realization of recording.Given the probable relation between a refusal to provide record and illegal methods to collect evidence, presumption rules could be designed.Several purposes could thereby be achieved, including safeguarding the implemen-tation and inner integration of laws, unifying the judicial standard in judging, urging the interrogation and recording to be strictly legally carried out, ensuring the accurateness of both procedural and substantive judgments.In the application of the presumption rules, foundation facts should be proved by the defendant or the judge, the accusers'right to refute should be adequately protected, the standard of proof of disputing facts and rebutting facts should be scientifically developed.