国家检察官学院学报
國傢檢察官學院學報
국가검찰관학원학보
JOURNAL OF NATIONAL PROCURATORS COLLEGE
2015年
3期
81-94,174
,共15页
法官%司法经验%学术讨论会%传承与发展%统计分析
法官%司法經驗%學術討論會%傳承與髮展%統計分析
법관%사법경험%학술토론회%전승여발전%통계분석
Judges%Judicial Experience%Colloquium%Transmission and Developments%Statistical A-nalysis
全国法院学术讨论会的获奖论文蕴含着丰富的司法经验,为分析中国司法经验的传承与发展提供了极具价值的样本。中国司法经验的传承和发展,大致分为以发现问题为重心的征集“立法类经验”、以理论突围为特征的总结“理论性经验”和以经验反思为主旨的发展“应用型经验”等三个阶段。其成就主要表现为充分展现了案件审判经验、广泛汇集了司法工作经验,并逐步统一了理念认知经验。按照事实是否清楚、法律是否规定和严格适用法律是否合理三个要素,所有案件可以划分为由六类基本案件组成的九类案件,中国司法的基本经验为所有这些案件提供了相应的解决方案。“休谟难题”、“地方性知识”、“个性化实践”和“法官裁量权膨胀”的疑虑,与中国司法经验传承和发展的收益相比,都显得微不足道。司法经验具有广阔的发展前景,只不过中国司法经验的传承和发展应当根据经验的类型分别采取相应的具体方案。
全國法院學術討論會的穫獎論文蘊含著豐富的司法經驗,為分析中國司法經驗的傳承與髮展提供瞭極具價值的樣本。中國司法經驗的傳承和髮展,大緻分為以髮現問題為重心的徵集“立法類經驗”、以理論突圍為特徵的總結“理論性經驗”和以經驗反思為主旨的髮展“應用型經驗”等三箇階段。其成就主要錶現為充分展現瞭案件審判經驗、廣汎彙集瞭司法工作經驗,併逐步統一瞭理唸認知經驗。按照事實是否清楚、法律是否規定和嚴格適用法律是否閤理三箇要素,所有案件可以劃分為由六類基本案件組成的九類案件,中國司法的基本經驗為所有這些案件提供瞭相應的解決方案。“休謨難題”、“地方性知識”、“箇性化實踐”和“法官裁量權膨脹”的疑慮,與中國司法經驗傳承和髮展的收益相比,都顯得微不足道。司法經驗具有廣闊的髮展前景,隻不過中國司法經驗的傳承和髮展應噹根據經驗的類型分彆採取相應的具體方案。
전국법원학술토론회적획장논문온함착봉부적사법경험,위분석중국사법경험적전승여발전제공료겁구개치적양본。중국사법경험적전승화발전,대치분위이발현문제위중심적정집“입법류경험”、이이론돌위위특정적총결“이론성경험”화이경험반사위주지적발전“응용형경험”등삼개계단。기성취주요표현위충분전현료안건심판경험、엄범회집료사법공작경험,병축보통일료이념인지경험。안조사실시부청초、법률시부규정화엄격괄용법률시부합리삼개요소,소유안건가이화분위유륙류기본안건조성적구류안건,중국사법적기본경험위소유저사안건제공료상응적해결방안。“휴모난제”、“지방성지식”、“개성화실천”화“법관재량권팽창”적의필,여중국사법경험전승화발전적수익상비,도현득미불족도。사법경험구유엄활적발전전경,지불과중국사법경험적전승화발전응당근거경험적류형분별채취상응적구체방안。
The winning papers of national court colloquium contain rich judicial experience, which provides valua-ble samples for analyzing the transmission and development of judicial experience in China.The transmis-sion and development of Chinese judicial experience could be roughly divided into three phases, covering“legislative experience” focusing on problems, “theoretical experience” distinguished by theoretical break-through and“practical experience” to reflect on the experience.The main achievements of Chinese judicial experiences includes demonstrating trial experience fully, collecting judicial experience extensively, and the gradually unified concept of cognitive experience.According to whether the facts and the law provisions is clear, and strict application of the law is reasonable, all the cases can be divided to nine categories consis-ted of six basic cases.The basic experience of Chinese justice provides appropriate solutions for all these ca-ses.“Hume's problem”, “local knowledge”, “personalized practice” and “judges discretion inflation”seems insignificant in contrast with the transmission and developments of Chinese judicial experience.Judi-cial experience has broad prospects, but the transmission and developments of Chinese judicial experience should take the appropriate specific programs according to the type of experience.