CAJ | 학술논문

目的：评价不同雾化吸入方式治疗小儿哮喘的效果。方法选取小儿哮喘患儿40例作为本研究对象，参照组20例，研究组20例，两组采用布地奈德配合其他药物雾化吸入治疗，其中研究组采用空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗，参照组给予氧气驱动雾化吸入治疗。对比两组在临床疗效、不良反应等方面的差异性。结果研究组治疗总有效率明显高于参照组，不良反应明显低于参照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗小儿哮喘效果显著，安全性高。
목적：평개불동무화흡입방식치료소인효천적효과。방법선취소인효천환인40례작위본연구대상，삼조조20례，연구조20례，량조채용포지내덕배합기타약물무화흡입치료，기중연구조채용공기압축빙무화흡입치료，삼조조급여양기구동무화흡입치료。대비량조재림상료효、불량반응등방면적차이성。결과연구조치료총유효솔명현고우삼조조，불량반응명현저우삼조조，차이유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。결론공기압축빙무화흡입치료소인효천효과현저，안전성고。
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of different atomization inhalation treatment of infantile asthma, for your reference. Methods Select pediatric asthma in children with 40 cases as the research object, the reference group 20 cases, group 20 cases, two groups with budesonide aerosol inhalation therapy with other drugs, including the team USES the air compressor pump atomizing inhalation treatment, control group given oxygen atomization inhalation therapy. Compared two groups in clinical efficacy, adverse reactions, etc.Results Treatment group total effective rate is signiifcantly higher than control group, the adverse reaction is lower than the control group obviously, the difference was statistically signiifcant (P<0.05).ConclusionAir compressor pump atomizing inhalation treatment of infantile asthma effect is remarkable, high safety.