医学临床研究
醫學臨床研究
의학림상연구
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH
2015年
4期
734-736,737
,共4页
胡江辉%聂琳%周肖如%左大镒
鬍江輝%聶琳%週肖如%左大鎰
호강휘%섭림%주초여%좌대일
DNA ,肿瘤/分析%流式细胞术%乳腺肿瘤/遗传学%乳腺肿瘤/病理学%增生%诊断 ,鉴别
DNA ,腫瘤/分析%流式細胞術%乳腺腫瘤/遺傳學%乳腺腫瘤/病理學%增生%診斷 ,鑒彆
DNA ,종류/분석%류식세포술%유선종류/유전학%유선종류/병이학%증생%진단 ,감별
DNA,Neoplasm/AN%Flow Cytometry%Breast Neoplasms/GE%Breast Neoplasms/PA%Hyperplasia%Diagnosis,Differential
【目的】探讨细胞DNA定量分析技术在乳腺导管非典型增生与癌变鉴别中的诊断价值。【方法】收集正常乳腺组织30例(Ⅰ组),乳腺导管轻中度不典型增生22例(Ⅱ组)、重度不典型增生30例(Ⅲ组)及浸润性导管癌42例(Ⅳ组),采用常规制片脱蜡酶消法制片,经Feulgen染色后应用全自动细胞DNA定量分析仪对切片作图像分析,其指标包括:细胞相对DNA 含量(DI值)、S期细胞比率(SPF)、正常G0/G1细胞DNA 含量的半数(1C),二倍体细胞(2C 细胞)等。【结果】从Ⅰ~Ⅳ组,DI及SPF逐渐增高( P <0.05),且组间比较有统计学差异( P <0.05);从Ⅰ~Ⅳ组,含有2C细胞的比例逐渐降低,而含有3C、4C、5C细胞的比例逐渐增高( P <0.05),Ⅰ组、Ⅱ组及Ⅲ组不含有异倍体细胞(>5C细胞),仅有Ⅳ组含有异倍体细胞(>5C细胞);四组的核长径及短径、核周长、核面积从Ⅰ~Ⅳ组逐渐增加( P<0.05),且组间比较有统计学差异( P<0.05)。【结论】细胞DNA定量分析技术在乳腺导管非典型增生与癌变鉴别中具有较高诊断价值。
【目的】探討細胞DNA定量分析技術在乳腺導管非典型增生與癌變鑒彆中的診斷價值。【方法】收集正常乳腺組織30例(Ⅰ組),乳腺導管輕中度不典型增生22例(Ⅱ組)、重度不典型增生30例(Ⅲ組)及浸潤性導管癌42例(Ⅳ組),採用常規製片脫蠟酶消法製片,經Feulgen染色後應用全自動細胞DNA定量分析儀對切片作圖像分析,其指標包括:細胞相對DNA 含量(DI值)、S期細胞比率(SPF)、正常G0/G1細胞DNA 含量的半數(1C),二倍體細胞(2C 細胞)等。【結果】從Ⅰ~Ⅳ組,DI及SPF逐漸增高( P <0.05),且組間比較有統計學差異( P <0.05);從Ⅰ~Ⅳ組,含有2C細胞的比例逐漸降低,而含有3C、4C、5C細胞的比例逐漸增高( P <0.05),Ⅰ組、Ⅱ組及Ⅲ組不含有異倍體細胞(>5C細胞),僅有Ⅳ組含有異倍體細胞(>5C細胞);四組的覈長徑及短徑、覈週長、覈麵積從Ⅰ~Ⅳ組逐漸增加( P<0.05),且組間比較有統計學差異( P<0.05)。【結論】細胞DNA定量分析技術在乳腺導管非典型增生與癌變鑒彆中具有較高診斷價值。
【목적】탐토세포DNA정량분석기술재유선도관비전형증생여암변감별중적진단개치。【방법】수집정상유선조직30례(Ⅰ조),유선도관경중도불전형증생22례(Ⅱ조)、중도불전형증생30례(Ⅲ조)급침윤성도관암42례(Ⅳ조),채용상규제편탈사매소법제편,경Feulgen염색후응용전자동세포DNA정량분석의대절편작도상분석,기지표포괄:세포상대DNA 함량(DI치)、S기세포비솔(SPF)、정상G0/G1세포DNA 함량적반수(1C),이배체세포(2C 세포)등。【결과】종Ⅰ~Ⅳ조,DI급SPF축점증고( P <0.05),차조간비교유통계학차이( P <0.05);종Ⅰ~Ⅳ조,함유2C세포적비례축점강저,이함유3C、4C、5C세포적비례축점증고( P <0.05),Ⅰ조、Ⅱ조급Ⅲ조불함유이배체세포(>5C세포),부유Ⅳ조함유이배체세포(>5C세포);사조적핵장경급단경、핵주장、핵면적종Ⅰ~Ⅳ조축점증가( P<0.05),차조간비교유통계학차이( P<0.05)。【결론】세포DNA정량분석기술재유선도관비전형증생여암변감별중구유교고진단개치。
[Objective] To explore the diagnostic value in breast ductal atypical hyperplasia versus cancer by cellular DNA quantitative cytology .[Methods] Four groups of normal breast (Ⅰ group ,n =30) ,ductal mild‐moderate breast ductal atypical hyperplasia (Ⅱ group ,n=22) ,severe dysplasia (Ⅲ group ,n=30) and infiltra‐ting ductal carcinoma (Ⅳ group ,n=42) were collected ,subjected to Feulgen staining and then measured by DNA quantitative cytology .[Results] Obvious statistical differences existed in DNA index (DI) and S phase fraction (SPF) between four groups (I ,Ⅱ ,Ⅲ & Ⅳ) ( P<0 .05) .And significant differences were also found by compa‐ring different methods ( P <0 .05) .DI and SPF increased gradually from Ⅰ to Ⅳ groups .Significant statistical differences existed in the ratios of 2C ,3C‐4C and 5C cells among four groups ( P<0 .05) .The ratio of 2C cell de‐creased gradually while the ratios of 3C‐4C and 5C cells increased gradually from Ⅰ to Ⅳ groups ( P<0 .05) .5C cell and DNA aneuploidy were not found in groups I ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ .And DNA aneuploidy only existed in group Ⅳ . Significant differences also existed in nuclear long diameter and short diameter ,perimeter and nuclear area among four groups ( P <0 .05) .And each parameter increased gradually from Ⅰ to Ⅳ groups .[Conclusion] Cellular DNA quantitative cytology is vital for an early differential diagnosis of breast ductal atypical hyperplasia versus cancer .