中国当代医药
中國噹代醫藥
중국당대의약
PERSON
2015年
13期
51-53
,共3页
金属烤瓷冠%修复体%临床疗效
金屬烤瓷冠%脩複體%臨床療效
금속고자관%수복체%림상료효
Metal-ceramic crown%Restoration%Clinical effect
目的:探讨金属烤瓷冠修复技术临床效果,总结金属烤瓷冠的最佳修复方法。方法选取2012年7月~2013年6月在本院口腔科就诊并选择金属烤瓷冠修复技术的120例患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析研究,根据修复体材料的不同分为观察组和对照组,各组60例,观察组采用金合内冠进行牙齿修复,对照组采用镍铬合金进行牙齿修复,修复后1年观察两组患者临床治疗效果及并发症发生情况,观察两种方法的优缺点,进行对比分析。结果观察组患者临床治疗总有效率为96.67%,显著高于对照组81.67%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组出现牙龈炎、牙龈肿痛出血、牙龈变色、口腔异味、全冠松脱等并发症的发生率显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论金属烤瓷冠修复技术中金合内冠和镍铬合金均取得了满意疗效,金合内冠明显优于镍铬合金,金合内冠对牙周组织损伤小,不易出现牙龈炎、牙龈肿痛出血、牙龈变色、口腔异味及全冠松脱等并发症的发生,美观性好,是一种较为理想的修复方式,值得推广应用。
目的:探討金屬烤瓷冠脩複技術臨床效果,總結金屬烤瓷冠的最佳脩複方法。方法選取2012年7月~2013年6月在本院口腔科就診併選擇金屬烤瓷冠脩複技術的120例患者的臨床資料進行迴顧性分析研究,根據脩複體材料的不同分為觀察組和對照組,各組60例,觀察組採用金閤內冠進行牙齒脩複,對照組採用鎳鉻閤金進行牙齒脩複,脩複後1年觀察兩組患者臨床治療效果及併髮癥髮生情況,觀察兩種方法的優缺點,進行對比分析。結果觀察組患者臨床治療總有效率為96.67%,顯著高于對照組81.67%,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);觀察組齣現牙齦炎、牙齦腫痛齣血、牙齦變色、口腔異味、全冠鬆脫等併髮癥的髮生率顯著低于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論金屬烤瓷冠脩複技術中金閤內冠和鎳鉻閤金均取得瞭滿意療效,金閤內冠明顯優于鎳鉻閤金,金閤內冠對牙週組織損傷小,不易齣現牙齦炎、牙齦腫痛齣血、牙齦變色、口腔異味及全冠鬆脫等併髮癥的髮生,美觀性好,是一種較為理想的脩複方式,值得推廣應用。
목적:탐토금속고자관수복기술림상효과,총결금속고자관적최가수복방법。방법선취2012년7월~2013년6월재본원구강과취진병선택금속고자관수복기술적120례환자적림상자료진행회고성분석연구,근거수복체재료적불동분위관찰조화대조조,각조60례,관찰조채용금합내관진행아치수복,대조조채용얼락합금진행아치수복,수복후1년관찰량조환자림상치료효과급병발증발생정황,관찰량충방법적우결점,진행대비분석。결과관찰조환자림상치료총유효솔위96.67%,현저고우대조조81.67%,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);관찰조출현아간염、아간종통출혈、아간변색、구강이미、전관송탈등병발증적발생솔현저저우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론금속고자관수복기술중금합내관화얼락합금균취득료만의료효,금합내관명현우우얼락합금,금합내관대아주조직손상소,불역출현아간염、아간종통출혈、아간변색、구강이미급전관송탈등병발증적발생,미관성호,시일충교위이상적수복방식,치득추엄응용。
Objective To explore the clinical effect of metal-ceramic crown remediation technique and sum up the op-timal remediation of varieties of metal-ceramic crown. Methods Clinical data of 120 patients who visited our depart-ment and agreed on metal-ceramic crown remediation technique from July 2012 to June 2013 were retrospectively ana-lyzed and studied.Based on different remediation material,they were divided into observation group and control group,60 cases in each group.In observation group,inner crown in gold alloy was adopted for dental rehabilitation,while in control group,nichrome was chosen.One year after remediation,clinical therapeutic effect,occurrence of complications,advantage and disadvantage of two methods between two groups was analyzed and compared respectively. Results The total clini-cal therapeutic effect in observation group was 96.67%,much higher than that in control group accounting for 81.67%, with statistical difference (P<0.05).In observation group,incidence of complications like gingivitis,swelling and aching of gum,gingival bleeding,gingival discoloration,bad breath,and full crown loose was remarkably lower than that in control group,with statistical difference(P<0.05). Conclusion In the technique of metal-ceramic crown remediation,inner crown in gold alloy and nichrome both obtain satisfying effects,but the effect in the former is better than that in latter.Inner crown in gold alloy,at advantages of small damage to periodontium,few complications such as gingivitis,swelling and aching of gum,gingival bleeding,gingival discoloration,bad breath,and full crown loose and so forth,and high aesthetic perception,is a relatively ideal remediation,which is worthy of adoption and expansion.