CAJ | 학술논문

转质制度在日耳曼法时期已初现端倪，其可分为承诺转质与责任转质。相较于承诺转质，责任转质由于其本身的复杂性以及对“意思自治”的挑战，一直是理论与实践中争议的焦点。我国现行立法对于责任转质未作出明确规定，忽略了责任转质的客观存在，这种现状容易滋生以下流弊：忽视现实中常有的责任转质现象的存在，可能导致在各方当事人中利益保护的失衡；承诺转质固有的局限性使其往往处于虚置的位置；不利于“物尽其用”，因而妨碍社会整体经济福利的增进。面对责任转质在实践中的客观存在与立法上缺位的困境，引入责任转质制度是我国未来立法的应然选择。
전질제도재일이만법시기이초현단예，기가분위승낙전질여책임전질。상교우승낙전질，책임전질유우기본신적복잡성이급대“의사자치”적도전，일직시이론여실천중쟁의적초점。아국현행입법대우책임전질미작출명학규정，홀략료책임전질적객관존재，저충현상용역자생이하류폐：홀시현실중상유적책임전질현상적존재，가능도치재각방당사인중이익보호적실형；승낙전질고유적국한성사기왕왕처우허치적위치；불리우“물진기용”，인이방애사회정체경제복리적증진。면대책임전질재실천중적객관존재여입법상결위적곤경，인입책임전질제도시아국미래입법적응연선택。
The sub-pledge system first emerged in the early Germanic period and it can be divided into sub-pledge by accep-tance and responsible sub-pledge. Different from the sub-pledge by acceptance,responsible sub-pledge has been the focus of controversy in theory and practice because of its complexity and challenge to the“autonomy”. The current legislation in China ignored the existence of responsible sub-pledge and has not made clear provision for responsible sub-pledge,which breeds the following problems: ignoring the usual existence of responsible sub-pledge in reality could lead to imbalance in interests protection for all parties;the inherent limitations of sub-pledge by acceptance often place itself in a false position;it’s not conducive to the principle of“make the best use of everything”and hinder the improvement of overall economic benefits in society. Introducing the responsible sub-pledge system is an appropriate choice for China’s future legislation in the face of the existence of responsible sub-pledge and the lack of relevant legislation.