河北医学
河北醫學
하북의학
HEBEI MEDICINE
2015年
10期
1715-1718
,共4页
护理干预%慢性心力衰竭%心功能%生活质量
護理榦預%慢性心力衰竭%心功能%生活質量
호리간예%만성심력쇠갈%심공능%생활질량
Nursing intervention%Chronic heart failure%Heart function%Quality of life
目的:探讨护理干预对慢性心力衰竭( CHF)患者心功能的影响,改善患者生存质量。方法:将选取的60例患者随机分为观察组和对照组各30例,两组患者均给予常规护理,观察组加用护理干预,观察记录干预前及干预3个月后左室射血分数( LVEF )、左室舒张末内径( LVEDD、左室收缩末内径( LVESD)、6min步行试验及明尼苏达心功能不全生命质量量表( MLHFQ)评分。结果:干预前,两组患者LVEF、LVEDD、LVESD及6min步行试验相似,差异无统计学意义( P>0.05);干预3个月后,观察组LVESD、LVEDD均明显低于对照组,LVEF及6min步行试验明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预前,两组患者MLHFQ评分相似,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预1个月及3个月后,观察组MLHFQ评分均明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。结论:护理干预能有效改善CHF患者的心功能,提高生活质量。
目的:探討護理榦預對慢性心力衰竭( CHF)患者心功能的影響,改善患者生存質量。方法:將選取的60例患者隨機分為觀察組和對照組各30例,兩組患者均給予常規護理,觀察組加用護理榦預,觀察記錄榦預前及榦預3箇月後左室射血分數( LVEF )、左室舒張末內徑( LVEDD、左室收縮末內徑( LVESD)、6min步行試驗及明尼囌達心功能不全生命質量量錶( MLHFQ)評分。結果:榦預前,兩組患者LVEF、LVEDD、LVESD及6min步行試驗相似,差異無統計學意義( P>0.05);榦預3箇月後,觀察組LVESD、LVEDD均明顯低于對照組,LVEF及6min步行試驗明顯高于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。榦預前,兩組患者MLHFQ評分相似,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);榦預1箇月及3箇月後,觀察組MLHFQ評分均明顯低于對照組,差異有統計學意義( P<0.05)。結論:護理榦預能有效改善CHF患者的心功能,提高生活質量。
목적:탐토호리간예대만성심력쇠갈( CHF)환자심공능적영향,개선환자생존질량。방법:장선취적60례환자수궤분위관찰조화대조조각30례,량조환자균급여상규호리,관찰조가용호리간예,관찰기록간예전급간예3개월후좌실사혈분수( LVEF )、좌실서장말내경( LVEDD、좌실수축말내경( LVESD)、6min보행시험급명니소체심공능불전생명질량량표( MLHFQ)평분。결과:간예전,량조환자LVEF、LVEDD、LVESD급6min보행시험상사,차이무통계학의의( P>0.05);간예3개월후,관찰조LVESD、LVEDD균명현저우대조조,LVEF급6min보행시험명현고우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。간예전,량조환자MLHFQ평분상사,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);간예1개월급3개월후,관찰조MLHFQ평분균명현저우대조조,차이유통계학의의( P<0.05)。결론:호리간예능유효개선CHF환자적심공능,제고생활질량。
Objective:To investigate the effects of nursing intervention on the heart function and to im-prove the quality of life of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF).Methods:A total of 60 patients were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group , with 30 patients in each group;the patients of both groups were given with usual care , while the patients of the observation group given with nursing intervention additionally , and the left ventricular ejection fractions ( LVEF) , left ventricular end-di-astolic dimensions (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD), 6min walking test results, and Minnesoda living with heart failure questionnaire ( MLHFQ) scores were observed and recorded before the intervention and at 3 months after the intervention .Result: Before the intervention , the patients of the two groups had similar LVEF , LVEDD, LVESD, and 6 min walking test results , and the differences were statistically insignificant ( P>0.05);at 3 months after the intervention , the patients of the observation group had significantly lower LVESD and LVEDD than the control group , and significantly higher LVEF and 6 min walking test result than the control group , and the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05) .Before the intervention , the patients of the two groups had similar MLHFQ scores , and the difference was statistical-ly insignificant ( P>0.05); at 1 month and 3 months after the intervention , the patients of the observation group had significantly lower MLHFQ scores than the control group , and the differences were statistically sig-nificant ( P<0.05) .Conclusion:Nursing intervention can effectively improve the heart function and elevate the quality of life in CHF patients .