廉政文化研究
廉政文化研究
렴정문화연구
ANTI-CORRUPTION AND INTEGRITY CULTURE STUDIES
2015年
2期
41-52
,共12页
高校腐败特征%制度性同形%高校治理结构
高校腐敗特徵%製度性同形%高校治理結構
고교부패특정%제도성동형%고교치리결구
features of corruption in universities%institutional homomorphism%governance structure of universities
基于新制度主义中的制度性同形理论,通过对117个高校腐败案例进行分析,发现高校腐败最大的特征就是与政府腐败特点的一致性,无论是在腐败主体特征还是腐败行为特征方面都极为相似。研究表明:在高等教育场域中,在强制性同形和模仿性同形机制作用下,高等教育场域中的高校与政府呈现组织性趋同现象,两者的组织结构、治理机制、监督漏洞、官场文化等方面都具有同形性,两者都采取相对集权的治理结构,而监督制衡机制效果不彰,无法有效地约束和限制权力,从而使高校腐败特征与政府腐败特征表现一致。从这个特点上来说,高校现有的治理结构和权力机制并没有体现出高校应有的独特性,其权力的运行机制也不足以控制腐败的发生。
基于新製度主義中的製度性同形理論,通過對117箇高校腐敗案例進行分析,髮現高校腐敗最大的特徵就是與政府腐敗特點的一緻性,無論是在腐敗主體特徵還是腐敗行為特徵方麵都極為相似。研究錶明:在高等教育場域中,在彊製性同形和模倣性同形機製作用下,高等教育場域中的高校與政府呈現組織性趨同現象,兩者的組織結構、治理機製、鑑督漏洞、官場文化等方麵都具有同形性,兩者都採取相對集權的治理結構,而鑑督製衡機製效果不彰,無法有效地約束和限製權力,從而使高校腐敗特徵與政府腐敗特徵錶現一緻。從這箇特點上來說,高校現有的治理結構和權力機製併沒有體現齣高校應有的獨特性,其權力的運行機製也不足以控製腐敗的髮生。
기우신제도주의중적제도성동형이론,통과대117개고교부패안례진행분석,발현고교부패최대적특정취시여정부부패특점적일치성,무론시재부패주체특정환시부패행위특정방면도겁위상사。연구표명:재고등교육장역중,재강제성동형화모방성동형궤제작용하,고등교육장역중적고교여정부정현조직성추동현상,량자적조직결구、치리궤제、감독루동、관장문화등방면도구유동형성,량자도채취상대집권적치리결구,이감독제형궤제효과불창,무법유효지약속화한제권력,종이사고교부패특정여정부부패특정표현일치。종저개특점상래설,고교현유적치리결구화권력궤제병몰유체현출고교응유적독특성,기권력적운행궤제야불족이공제부패적발생。
Based on the institutional homomorphism theory of new institutionalism and by analyzing 117 corruption cases in universities, we find that the most distinctive feature of corruption in universities is the consistency with that in governments. The research shows that under the effect of the mandatory homomorphism and imitative homomorphism mechanisms, the organizational convergence appears in both universities and governments in higher education field, where homomorphism exists in their organization structure, governance institutions, supervision loophole, and bureaucratic culture. Both of them adopt relatively power-concentrated governance structure while the effect of the supervisory institution is not satisfying. The abuse of power can not be effectively restrained and restricted. Therefore, the features of the corruption in universities and that of corruption in governments share many similarities. In light of this feature, the existing governance structure and power mechanism of universities do not present their due uniqueness, and its power mechanism is deficient and unable to prevent the corruption.