中国实用护理杂志
中國實用護理雜誌
중국실용호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL NURSING
2015年
10期
720-725
,共6页
郭玲%程秀菊%郝凯军%王克芳
郭玲%程秀菊%郝凱軍%王剋芳
곽령%정수국%학개군%왕극방
护士%绩效考核%指标体系
護士%績效攷覈%指標體繫
호사%적효고핵%지표체계
Nurse%Performance appraisal%Index system
目的 以量、质、效、技为基础,构建责任制整体护理模式下护士绩效考核指标体系.方法 通过专家访谈和Delphi专家函询完成指标体系构建;采用SPSS17.0进行数据统计及可靠性分析.结果 构建了包含层次系数、工作量分数、护理质量得分率和奖励金额4个Ⅰ级指标和12个Ⅱ级指标的护士绩效考核指标体系;确立了各部分计算方法;2轮函询专家积极系数为94.3％和100.0％,权威系数为0.83和0.84;各指标重要性和可操作性评分均数为4.27～5.00和4.26～4.94,变异系数为0.00～0.26和0.05～0.26;Ⅰ、Ⅱ级指标重要性和可操作性协调系数为0.13～0.43,协调系数显著性检验P＜0.05.结论 该指标体系各维度的设计与现行的责任制整体护理模式相匹配,充分考虑了护士岗位管理、分层使用、责任护士包干患者、分级护理等诸多因素,关键指标代表性强,能充分体现多劳多得、优劳优酬、奖优罚劣的分配理念.
目的 以量、質、效、技為基礎,構建責任製整體護理模式下護士績效攷覈指標體繫.方法 通過專傢訪談和Delphi專傢函詢完成指標體繫構建;採用SPSS17.0進行數據統計及可靠性分析.結果 構建瞭包含層次繫數、工作量分數、護理質量得分率和獎勵金額4箇Ⅰ級指標和12箇Ⅱ級指標的護士績效攷覈指標體繫;確立瞭各部分計算方法;2輪函詢專傢積極繫數為94.3％和100.0％,權威繫數為0.83和0.84;各指標重要性和可操作性評分均數為4.27～5.00和4.26～4.94,變異繫數為0.00～0.26和0.05～0.26;Ⅰ、Ⅱ級指標重要性和可操作性協調繫數為0.13～0.43,協調繫數顯著性檢驗P＜0.05.結論 該指標體繫各維度的設計與現行的責任製整體護理模式相匹配,充分攷慮瞭護士崗位管理、分層使用、責任護士包榦患者、分級護理等諸多因素,關鍵指標代錶性彊,能充分體現多勞多得、優勞優酬、獎優罰劣的分配理唸.
목적 이량、질、효、기위기출,구건책임제정체호리모식하호사적효고핵지표체계.방법 통과전가방담화Delphi전가함순완성지표체계구건;채용SPSS17.0진행수거통계급가고성분석.결과 구건료포함층차계수、공작량분수、호리질량득분솔화장려금액4개Ⅰ급지표화12개Ⅱ급지표적호사적효고핵지표체계;학립료각부분계산방법;2륜함순전가적겁계수위94.3％화100.0％,권위계수위0.83화0.84;각지표중요성화가조작성평분균수위4.27～5.00화4.26～4.94,변이계수위0.00～0.26화0.05～0.26;Ⅰ、Ⅱ급지표중요성화가조작성협조계수위0.13～0.43,협조계수현저성검험P＜0.05.결론 해지표체계각유도적설계여현행적책임제정체호리모식상필배,충분고필료호사강위관리、분층사용、책임호사포간환자、분급호리등제다인소,관건지표대표성강,능충분체현다로다득、우로우수、장우벌렬적분배이념.
Objective This study aimed to construct an index system for nurse performance appraisal based on the quantity,quality,efficiency and technology in holistic nursing mode.Methods Expert interviews and Delphi expert enquiry were used to complete the construction of index system,and SPSS17.0 was used to do data statistics and reliability analysis.Results The nurse performance appraisal index system was constructed which contained 4 level-Ⅰ indicators such as level coefficient,nursing workload scores,nursing quality scoring rate and reward amount and 12 level-Ⅱ indicators.The calculation method of each part was also established.The expert positive coefficients were 94.3％ and 100.0％ respectively,the authority coefficients were 0.83 and 0.84,the importance and feasibility mean scores of every index were 4.27-5.00 and 4.26-4.94,and coefficients of variation were 0.00-0.26 and 0.05-0.26 in 2 rounds of enquiry.The importance of level-Ⅰ or level-Ⅱ indicators and operability coordination coefficients were 0.13-0.43,the significance test showed P ＜ 0.05.Conclusions The design of each dimension of the index system gives full consideration to nurse post management,hierarchical using,the nurse in charge of the patient,grading nursing care and many other factors.Representative of key indicators is strong,and it can reflect the distribution concept that more payment for more contributions,best's best reward and rewarding the good and punishing the bad.
