CAJ | 학술논문

目的了解近年来我国护理科研的开展状况和存在的问题,揭示我国护理科研与国外护理科研之间的差异.方法通过中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、PubMed、Google学术搜索等检索2008年至2013年5种国内护理期刊、4种国外护理期刊.应用文献计量方法对所选我国护理期刊中的科研课题地区分布、参与人数、合作单位、课题项目来源、科研内容及方法等情况进行统计,并与所选国外护理期刊的科研课题进行比较.结果共统计出我国护理期刊科研论文1 527篇,遍布28个省、自治区和直辖市,其中广东省名列前茅[12.64％(193/1 527)];研究课题合作单位以1个单位[68.4％(1 045/1 527)]、参与人数以5人或5人以上[38.6％(589/1 527)居多;省级课题资助项目[81.4％(1 243/1 527)]多于国家级[18.6％(284/1 527)];科研论文内容注重于临床专科护理研究[37.8％(577/1 527))和临床基础护理研究[34.6％(529/1 527),研究方法多以描述性研究为主,其中临床分析占40.7％(622/1 527).与国外护理期刊比较,国外护理更注重护理心理研究、护理职业研究等与人文科学相关的主题研究,且调查分析占多数.学科升级后,护理研究论文数量迅速增加,与同期国外护理研究相比较,差异有统计学意义,P＜0.05;≥5个合作单位的论文数明显增加,来源于国家级的课题也明显优于学科升级前,其差异均有统计学意义,P＜ 0.05.结论我国护理期刊科研论文呈逐年增加趋势,护士参与科研的积极性较高,学科升级给护理科研带来了生机.但是科研合作还有待于进一步加强;科研项目的深度不够,需要加深;科研论文的内容和研究方向呈多样性,还没有形成集中趋势;缺少实验性研究方法;实验室的基础理论研究极为薄弱.
목적 료해근년래아국호이과연적개전상황화존재적문제,게시아국호이과연여국외호이과연지간적차이.방법 통과중국기간전문수거고(CNKI)、PubMed、Google학술수색등검색2008년지2013년5충국내호리기간、4충국외호리기간.응용문헌계량방법대소선아국호리기간중적과연과제지구분포、삼여인수、합작단위、과제항목래원、과연내용급방법등정황진행통계,병여소선국외호리기간적과연과제진행비교.결과 공통계출아국호리기간과연논문1 527편,편포28개성、자치구화직할시,기중광동성명렬전모[12.64％(193/1 527)];연구과제합작단위이1개단위[68.4％(1 045/1 527)]、삼여인수이5인혹5인이상[38.6％(589/1 527)거다;성급과제자조항목[81.4％(1 243/1 527)]다우국가급[18.6％(284/1 527)];과연논문내용주중우림상전과호리연구[37.8％(577/1 527))화림상기출호리연구[34.6％(529/1 527),연구방법다이묘술성연구위주,기중림상분석점40.7％(622/1 527).여국외호리기간비교,국외호리경주중호리심리연구、호리직업연구등여인문과학상관적주제연구,차조사분석점다수.학과승급후,호리연구논문수량신속증가,여동기국외호리연구상비교,차이유통계학의의,P＜0.05;≥5개합작단위적논문수명현증가,래원우국가급적과제야명현우우학과승급전,기차이균유통계학의의,P＜ 0.05.결론 아국호리기간과연논문정축년증가추세,호사삼여과연적적겁성교고,학과승급급호이과연대래료생궤.단시과연합작환유대우진일보가강;과연항목적심도불구,수요가심;과연논문적내용화연구방향정다양성,환몰유형성집중추세;결소실험성연구방법;실험실적기출이론연구겁위박약.
Objective To know the nursing scientific research status in recent years,and to reveal the differences between Chinese nursing scientific researches and foreign nursing scientific researches,in order to promote the rapid development of nursing cause in China.Methods Five Chinese journals of nursing and four foreign nursing journals were analyzed covered China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI),PubMed and Google data ranged from 2008 to 2013.By adopting bibliometrics method,regional distribution,the number of people participation,the cooperation between units,the source of financial funding,research content and nature of Chinese nursing research papers were analyzed,and also compared to research content and nature of foreign nursing journals.Results The amounts of published papers were 1 527 pieces.The geographical distribution of research papers were all spread over 28 provinces,autonomous regions sand municipalities directly under the central government,most of which was Guangdong province [12.64％ (193/1 527)];The majority of research papers were completed by single unit and more than five people,which about [68.4％(1 045/1 527)],[38.6％(589/1 527)],respectively;Provincial level of research papers were more than national level [81.4％(1 243/1 527) vs.18.6％(284/1 527)];The papers focused on the clinical nursing research [37.8％(577/1 527)] and clinical basic nursing research [34.6％(529/1 527)].Almost researches were descriptive research,while 40.7％(622/1527) of which were clinical analysis.Foreign nursing scientific researches paid more attention to psychological research and nursing profession which were related to humanities and investigation was major method used;Compared with the foreign nursing papers at the same time,the number of Chinese nursing research papers increased rapidly (P ＜ 0.05);Papers were completed more than five units rapidly increased compared with the pre-upgrade,as well as the national subjects,the difference was statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions The number of nursing research programs tended to increase year by year and the enthusiasm of nurses participating in scientific research was higher than before.Different units needed to further strengthen cooperation in scientific research.The research content and direction were diversity,which had not yet formed central tendency.The research method was still limited to descriptive studies,and the creativity of the research methods was needed,especially laboratory research.