淡水渔业
淡水漁業
담수어업
FRESHWATER FISHERIES
2015年
3期
70-77
,共8页
唐永涛%赵良杰%杨洋%刘其根%凡迎春%吴杰洋
唐永濤%趙良傑%楊洋%劉其根%凡迎春%吳傑洋
당영도%조량걸%양양%류기근%범영춘%오걸양
三角帆蚌(Hyriopsis cumingii)%鲢鳙%养殖水体%DGGE%菌群
三角帆蚌(Hyriopsis cumingii)%鰱鳙%養殖水體%DGGE%菌群
삼각범방(Hyriopsis cumingii)%련용%양식수체%DGGE%균군
Hyriopsis cumingii%Hypophthalmichthys molitrix and Aristichthys nobilis%aquaculture water%DGGE%bacte-rial flora
为了研究混养三角帆蚌( Hyriopsis cumingii)和鲢( Hypophthalmichthys molitrix)鳙( Aristichthys nobilis)对池塘养殖水体微生物群落结构的影响,分别在浙江海盐、江西九江、上海浦东开展了罗氏沼虾-三角帆蚌混养、草鱼—三角帆蚌混养、罗氏沼虾-三角帆蚌-鲢鳙鱼混养三组系列实验。利用DGGE技术对养殖水体的16S rDNA进行指纹图谱分析。三组实验共鉴定出57条不同条带,每组实验中混养三角帆蚌或鲢鳙实验组的平均条带数均高于单养水体水样平均条带数。 Shannon多样性指数分析结果显示,各养殖水体混养三角帆蚌、鲢鳙后,多样性指数均有所增加。 PCA分析和DGGE聚类结果显示,在无鲢鳙的情况下,蚌与主养物种(罗氏沼虾、草鱼)混养实验组的16S rDNA图谱聚为一类,显示出蚌对于微生物群落结构影响的贡献;在同时引入鲢鳙和蚌的情况下,16S rD-NA指纹图谱则是按照有无鲢鳙聚为两类,提示在本实验中鲢鳙对于水体微生物的影响要大于蚌。对DGGE图谱其中20条显著条带进行回收、测序和系统发育分析,结果表明,所获序列主要分属于放线菌门( Actinobacteria ,25%)、蓝藻门( Cyanobacteria ,25%)、α-变形菌亚门( Alphaproteobacteria ,15%)、β-变形菌亚门( Betaproteobac-teria,15%)、γ-变形菌亚门( Gammaproteobacteria ,10%)、ε-变形菌亚门( Epsilonproteobacteria ,5%)、裸藻叶绿体( Euglenales ,5%)。
為瞭研究混養三角帆蚌( Hyriopsis cumingii)和鰱( Hypophthalmichthys molitrix)鳙( Aristichthys nobilis)對池塘養殖水體微生物群落結構的影響,分彆在浙江海鹽、江西九江、上海浦東開展瞭囉氏沼蝦-三角帆蚌混養、草魚—三角帆蚌混養、囉氏沼蝦-三角帆蚌-鰱鳙魚混養三組繫列實驗。利用DGGE技術對養殖水體的16S rDNA進行指紋圖譜分析。三組實驗共鑒定齣57條不同條帶,每組實驗中混養三角帆蚌或鰱鳙實驗組的平均條帶數均高于單養水體水樣平均條帶數。 Shannon多樣性指數分析結果顯示,各養殖水體混養三角帆蚌、鰱鳙後,多樣性指數均有所增加。 PCA分析和DGGE聚類結果顯示,在無鰱鳙的情況下,蚌與主養物種(囉氏沼蝦、草魚)混養實驗組的16S rDNA圖譜聚為一類,顯示齣蚌對于微生物群落結構影響的貢獻;在同時引入鰱鳙和蚌的情況下,16S rD-NA指紋圖譜則是按照有無鰱鳙聚為兩類,提示在本實驗中鰱鳙對于水體微生物的影響要大于蚌。對DGGE圖譜其中20條顯著條帶進行迴收、測序和繫統髮育分析,結果錶明,所穫序列主要分屬于放線菌門( Actinobacteria ,25%)、藍藻門( Cyanobacteria ,25%)、α-變形菌亞門( Alphaproteobacteria ,15%)、β-變形菌亞門( Betaproteobac-teria,15%)、γ-變形菌亞門( Gammaproteobacteria ,10%)、ε-變形菌亞門( Epsilonproteobacteria ,5%)、裸藻葉綠體( Euglenales ,5%)。
위료연구혼양삼각범방( Hyriopsis cumingii)화련( Hypophthalmichthys molitrix)용( Aristichthys nobilis)대지당양식수체미생물군락결구적영향,분별재절강해염、강서구강、상해포동개전료라씨소하-삼각범방혼양、초어—삼각범방혼양、라씨소하-삼각범방-련용어혼양삼조계렬실험。이용DGGE기술대양식수체적16S rDNA진행지문도보분석。삼조실험공감정출57조불동조대,매조실험중혼양삼각범방혹련용실험조적평균조대수균고우단양수체수양평균조대수。 Shannon다양성지수분석결과현시,각양식수체혼양삼각범방、련용후,다양성지수균유소증가。 PCA분석화DGGE취류결과현시,재무련용적정황하,방여주양물충(라씨소하、초어)혼양실험조적16S rDNA도보취위일류,현시출방대우미생물군락결구영향적공헌;재동시인입련용화방적정황하,16S rD-NA지문도보칙시안조유무련용취위량류,제시재본실험중련용대우수체미생물적영향요대우방。대DGGE도보기중20조현저조대진행회수、측서화계통발육분석,결과표명,소획서렬주요분속우방선균문( Actinobacteria ,25%)、람조문( Cyanobacteria ,25%)、α-변형균아문( Alphaproteobacteria ,15%)、β-변형균아문( Betaproteobac-teria,15%)、γ-변형균아문( Gammaproteobacteria ,10%)、ε-변형균아문( Epsilonproteobacteria ,5%)、라조협록체( Euglenales ,5%)。
In order to study the effects of the polycultured Hyriopsis cumingii, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix and Aristichthys nobilis on microbial community structure in aquaculture and to compare their different effects , three series of experiments which included M.rosenbergii-H.cumingii polyculture , Ctenopharyngodon idellus-H.cumingii polyculture and H.molitrix and A.nobilis-M.rosenbergii-H.cumingii polyculture were carried out in Haiyan County , Zhejiang Province , Jiujiang, Jiangxi province and Shanghai , separately.The 16S rDNA fingerprint was analyzed by DGGE technique .DGGE sketch map showed a total of 57 different bands for all samples , and the average number of bands from H.cumingii and /or H.molitrix and A.nobilis polyculture water samples higher than that from monoculture water samples .The analysis results of Shannon diversity index showed increased diversity indices when polycultured H.cumingii and/or H.molitrix and A.nobilis in aquaculture water .PCA analysis and DGGE clustering results showed that in the absence of H.molitrix and A.nobilis, the 16S rDNA map of H.cumingii and the main support species (M.rosenbergii, C.idellus) polyculture experi-mental groups clustered together, showing the impact of the H.cumingii on the microbial community structure in aquacul -ture water.When H.cumingii and H.molitrix and A.nobilis were polycultured together, the 16S rDNA map would clusteredinto two groups according to whether the H.molitrix and A.nobilis were introduced, suggesting that the impact of H.molitrix and A.nobilis on microbial was greater than that H.cumingii in aquaculture water in this study.20 significantbands were excised for sequencing and then constructed Phylogenetic tree .Results indicated that the main clones fromDGGE profile fell into 6 bacteria groups, including Actinobacteria (25%), Cyanobacteria(25%), Alphaproteobacteria(15%), Betaproteobacteria(15%), Gammaproteobacteria(10%), Epsilonproteobacteria(5%) and Euglenales(5%).