安徽医科大学学报
安徽醫科大學學報
안휘의과대학학보
ACTA UNIVERSITY MEDICINALIS ANHUI
2015年
5期
702-704
,共3页
张贤月%姜凡%谭捷%梁婧%罗平
張賢月%薑凡%譚捷%樑婧%囉平
장현월%강범%담첩%량청%라평
超声检查%胎儿%脐静脉
超聲檢查%胎兒%臍靜脈
초성검사%태인%제정맥
ultrasound%fetus%umbilical vein
超声测量168例孕20~26周正常胎儿脐带胎盘插入点、距脐孔50 mm 范围内游离段、腹内段3处的脐静脉血流量(QPI、QFL、 QIA)以及左门静脉血流量( QLPV),计算QLPV/ QIA,拟合 QPI 及 QIA 随孕周增长的回归方程,比较QPI 和 QIA、QFL 和 QIA。 QLPV/ QIA 在恒定范围内,95%参考值范围:0.42~0.58;QPI 及 QIA 与孕周的增长呈直线关系,回归方程:(QPI:^Y =21.25X -385.92,R2=0.970;QIA:^Y=17.26X -314.75,R2=0.954);QPI 和 QIA 比较差异有统计学意义(P <0.05),QFL 和 QIA 比较差异无统计学意义。
超聲測量168例孕20~26週正常胎兒臍帶胎盤插入點、距臍孔50 mm 範圍內遊離段、腹內段3處的臍靜脈血流量(QPI、QFL、 QIA)以及左門靜脈血流量( QLPV),計算QLPV/ QIA,擬閤 QPI 及 QIA 隨孕週增長的迴歸方程,比較QPI 和 QIA、QFL 和 QIA。 QLPV/ QIA 在恆定範圍內,95%參攷值範圍:0.42~0.58;QPI 及 QIA 與孕週的增長呈直線關繫,迴歸方程:(QPI:^Y =21.25X -385.92,R2=0.970;QIA:^Y=17.26X -314.75,R2=0.954);QPI 和 QIA 比較差異有統計學意義(P <0.05),QFL 和 QIA 比較差異無統計學意義。
초성측량168례잉20~26주정상태인제대태반삽입점、거제공50 mm 범위내유리단、복내단3처적제정맥혈류량(QPI、QFL、 QIA)이급좌문정맥혈류량( QLPV),계산QLPV/ QIA,의합 QPI 급 QIA 수잉주증장적회귀방정,비교QPI 화 QIA、QFL 화 QIA。 QLPV/ QIA 재항정범위내,95%삼고치범위:0.42~0.58;QPI 급 QIA 여잉주적증장정직선관계,회귀방정:(QPI:^Y =21.25X -385.92,R2=0.970;QIA:^Y=17.26X -314.75,R2=0.954);QPI 화 QIA 비교차이유통계학의의(P <0.05),QFL 화 QIA 비교차이무통계학의의。
168 fetuses were measured from uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at 20 ~ 26 weeks of gestation. The umbilical vein blood flow obtained at placental insertion, free loop and intra - abdominal portion ( QPI, QFL, QIA) and right portal vein blood flow(QLPV) were measured respectively by doppler ultrasound. QLPV/ QIA was calculated. QLPV/ QIA was in constant range:0. 42 ~ 0. 58. There was a linear relationship between QPI and QIA and growth of gestational age. The regression equation was:(QPI:^Y = 21. 25X - 385. 92, R2 = 0. 970; QIA:^Y =17. 26X - 314. 75, R2 = 0. 954). QPI and QIA were statistically significant (P < 0. 05). QFL and QIA were simi-lar.