中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2015年
10期
136-138
,共3页
血液透析%预防性护理%感染控制
血液透析%預防性護理%感染控製
혈액투석%예방성호리%감염공제
Hemodialysis%Preventive care%Infection control
目的：探讨预防性护理在血液透析患者感染控制中效果。方法整群选取2012年1月—2014年5月该院收治的血液透析患者共75例,并随机分为对照组(n=37)和观察组(n=38)。对照组给予常规性护理,观察组给予预防性护理,比较两组的感染发生情况、住院总时间和护理满意程度。结果经不同的护理干预后,观察组未发生感染事件,对照组感染率为27.6%,观察组显著地低于对照组(c2=5.851,P=0.016)；观察组住院时间为(18.2±3.7)d,显著地低于对照组的(23.8±4.5)d(t=0.8945,P=0.000)；观察组护理满意度率为97.4%,显著地高于对照组的78.4%(c2=5.851,P=0.016)。结论预防性护理能够有效地预防血液透析感染,缩短住院时间,有效地提高护理满意程度,应在血液透析中加强预防性护理干预。
目的：探討預防性護理在血液透析患者感染控製中效果。方法整群選取2012年1月—2014年5月該院收治的血液透析患者共75例,併隨機分為對照組(n=37)和觀察組(n=38)。對照組給予常規性護理,觀察組給予預防性護理,比較兩組的感染髮生情況、住院總時間和護理滿意程度。結果經不同的護理榦預後,觀察組未髮生感染事件,對照組感染率為27.6%,觀察組顯著地低于對照組(c2=5.851,P=0.016)；觀察組住院時間為(18.2±3.7)d,顯著地低于對照組的(23.8±4.5)d(t=0.8945,P=0.000)；觀察組護理滿意度率為97.4%,顯著地高于對照組的78.4%(c2=5.851,P=0.016)。結論預防性護理能夠有效地預防血液透析感染,縮短住院時間,有效地提高護理滿意程度,應在血液透析中加彊預防性護理榦預。
목적：탐토예방성호리재혈액투석환자감염공제중효과。방법정군선취2012년1월—2014년5월해원수치적혈액투석환자공75례,병수궤분위대조조(n=37)화관찰조(n=38)。대조조급여상규성호리,관찰조급여예방성호리,비교량조적감염발생정황、주원총시간화호리만의정도。결과경불동적호리간예후,관찰조미발생감염사건,대조조감염솔위27.6%,관찰조현저지저우대조조(c2=5.851,P=0.016)；관찰조주원시간위(18.2±3.7)d,현저지저우대조조적(23.8±4.5)d(t=0.8945,P=0.000)；관찰조호리만의도솔위97.4%,현저지고우대조조적78.4%(c2=5.851,P=0.016)。결론예방성호리능구유효지예방혈액투석감염,축단주원시간,유효지제고호리만의정도,응재혈액투석중가강예방성호리간예。
Objective To investigate the application effect of preventive care on controlling the infections in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Methods A total of 75 patients underwent hemodialysis in our hospital from January 2012 to May 2014 were randomly divided into the control group(n=37)and the observation group (n=38).The control group were given the conventional nursing, while the observation group were given the preventive care. And the incidence of infections, length of stay and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results After nursing intervention, no incidents of infection occurred in the observation group, while the infection rate in the control group was 27.6%, the observation group had much lower infection rate than the control group( 2=5.851, P=0.016). The length of stay of the observation group was (18.2±3.7)d, significantly shorter than (23.8±4.5)d of the control group (t=0.8945, P=0.000). The nursing satisfaction rate of the observation group was 97.4%, which was significantly higher than 78.4%of the control group(c2=5.851, =0.016). Conclusion Preventive care can effectively prevent the incidence of infections in hemodialysis, shorten the length of stay and improve the nursing satisfaction, therefore preventive care intervention should be strengthened in hemodialysis.
