安徽医科大学学报
安徽醫科大學學報
안휘의과대학학보
ACTA UNIVERSITY MEDICINALIS ANHUI
2015年
5期
664-668
,共5页
持续被动运动%足外翻%脑性瘫痪%足底压力
持續被動運動%足外翻%腦性癱瘓%足底壓力
지속피동운동%족외번%뇌성탄탄%족저압력
continuous passive motion%talipes valgus%cerebral palsy%plantar pressure
目的观察持续被动运动(CPM)在改善脑瘫患儿足外翻方面的效果及临床意义。方法本研究共57例儿童,分为正常组及外翻组,将外翻组患儿随机分为对照组、非CPM 组及 CPM 组。对照组未行任何康复治疗,非 CPM 组给予常规康复治疗,CPM 组给予常规康复治疗及 CPM 治疗。对正常组儿童行足底压力测量技术进行评估并记录,且分别于治疗前、治疗后第2个月及第4个月对外翻组行足底压力测量技术评估。结果与正常组相比,外翻组足弓内侧缘(MMF)、足跟(HEEL)压力百分比、着地时相及前足掌接触时相(ICP + FFCP)百分比明显增高,足前掌外侧缘(LFF)、足弓外侧缘(LMF)压力百分比及整足接触时相(FFP)百分比明显降低( P <0.05)。非 CPM 组、CPM 组在治疗前后MMF 压力百分比、FFP 百分比均减少(P <0.05),ICP + FF-CP 百分比增大(P <0.05);较非 CPM 组、对照组,CPM 组的MMF 压力百分比改善更明显(P <0.01),ICP + FFCP 百分比改善更明显(P <0.05)。结论踝关节持续被动运动能缓解小龄脑瘫足外翻患儿外翻肌的痉挛和挛缩,促进小龄患儿的足弓形成,使动态步行时各肌群协调性增强,从而改善脑瘫患儿步行能力。
目的觀察持續被動運動(CPM)在改善腦癱患兒足外翻方麵的效果及臨床意義。方法本研究共57例兒童,分為正常組及外翻組,將外翻組患兒隨機分為對照組、非CPM 組及 CPM 組。對照組未行任何康複治療,非 CPM 組給予常規康複治療,CPM 組給予常規康複治療及 CPM 治療。對正常組兒童行足底壓力測量技術進行評估併記錄,且分彆于治療前、治療後第2箇月及第4箇月對外翻組行足底壓力測量技術評估。結果與正常組相比,外翻組足弓內側緣(MMF)、足跟(HEEL)壓力百分比、著地時相及前足掌接觸時相(ICP + FFCP)百分比明顯增高,足前掌外側緣(LFF)、足弓外側緣(LMF)壓力百分比及整足接觸時相(FFP)百分比明顯降低( P <0.05)。非 CPM 組、CPM 組在治療前後MMF 壓力百分比、FFP 百分比均減少(P <0.05),ICP + FF-CP 百分比增大(P <0.05);較非 CPM 組、對照組,CPM 組的MMF 壓力百分比改善更明顯(P <0.01),ICP + FFCP 百分比改善更明顯(P <0.05)。結論踝關節持續被動運動能緩解小齡腦癱足外翻患兒外翻肌的痙攣和攣縮,促進小齡患兒的足弓形成,使動態步行時各肌群協調性增彊,從而改善腦癱患兒步行能力。
목적관찰지속피동운동(CPM)재개선뇌탄환인족외번방면적효과급림상의의。방법본연구공57례인동,분위정상조급외번조,장외번조환인수궤분위대조조、비CPM 조급 CPM 조。대조조미행임하강복치료,비 CPM 조급여상규강복치료,CPM 조급여상규강복치료급 CPM 치료。대정상조인동행족저압력측량기술진행평고병기록,차분별우치료전、치료후제2개월급제4개월대외번조행족저압력측량기술평고。결과여정상조상비,외번조족궁내측연(MMF)、족근(HEEL)압력백분비、착지시상급전족장접촉시상(ICP + FFCP)백분비명현증고,족전장외측연(LFF)、족궁외측연(LMF)압력백분비급정족접촉시상(FFP)백분비명현강저( P <0.05)。비 CPM 조、CPM 조재치료전후MMF 압력백분비、FFP 백분비균감소(P <0.05),ICP + FF-CP 백분비증대(P <0.05);교비 CPM 조、대조조,CPM 조적MMF 압력백분비개선경명현(P <0.01),ICP + FFCP 백분비개선경명현(P <0.05)。결론과관절지속피동운동능완해소령뇌탄족외번환인외번기적경련화련축,촉진소령환인적족궁형성,사동태보행시각기군협조성증강,종이개선뇌탄환인보행능력。
Objective To observe the treatment of continuous passive motion(CPM) on talipes valgus in the chil-dren with cerebral palsy. Methods There were 57 children in this research including normal group and valgus group, the children in valgus group were randomly divided into control group, non-CPM group and CPM group. The control group didn’t receive any rehabilitation treatment. The non-CPM group received conventional rehabilita-tion treatment. The CPM group received conventional rehabilitation and CPM therapy. Evaluate the children in nor-mal group with plantar pressure analysis and evaluate each patient before treatment two and four months after treat-ment with plantar pressure analysis. Results Compared with the normal group, the percentage of medial midfoot (MMF) pressure, HEEL pressure, initial contact phase(ICP) and forefoot contact phase(FFCP) were obviously higher in valgus groups. On the other hand, the percentage of lateral forefoot ( LFF) pressure, lateral midfoot (LMF) pressure and foot flat phase(FFP) were obviously lower in valgus groups(P < 0. 05). The percentage of MMF pressure, and FFP became lower after treatment in both CPM group and non-CPM group while the percentage of ICP and FFCP became higher(P < 0. 05). In CPM group there was a more obvious change with the percentage of MMF pressure, ICP and FFCP compared with non-CPM group and the control group(P < 0. 05). Conclusion U-sing CPM can alleviate muscle spasms and contracture, correct the deformity of midfoot, enhance the muscle group coordination on foot and further more improve gait of patients with cerebral palsy.