CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨T2DM患者轻度认知障碍（MCI）相关的影响因素。方法采用蒙特利尔认知评估（MoCA）（北京版）量表作为认知的测评工具。选取 T2DM 患者226例，经MoCA量表评估，＜26分者132例为T2DM＋MCI组，≥26分者94例为 T2DM 组。收集并比较两组人口统计学和临床资料。用超声多普勒仪检查双下肢动脉的异常，并计算踝肱指数（ABI）。用多功能彩超诊断颈动脉内‐中膜厚度（CIM T ）或有无动脉粥样硬化（AS ）斑块。结果两组年龄、SBP、T2DM 病程、教育程度、胱抑素‐C （Cys‐C）、血尿酸（SUA）、FPG、BUN、载脂蛋白A（ApoA）含量和载脂蛋白B（ApoB）含量比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05或 P＜0.01）。T2DM＋MCI组双下肢动脉异常者87.4％，CIMT＞1.1 mm或有AS斑块者67.9％，T2DM组则29.7％、33.6％（χ2＝19.337、16.553），两组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.01）；T2DM 组大学以上学历者28.7％，T2DM ＋ MCI组为15.9％，两组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。Logistic多元回归分析显示，文化程度、年龄、SBP和T2DM病程是MCI的影响因素。结论 T2DM 患者的病程、年龄、SBP可能是MCI的危险因素，文化程度可能是MCI的保护因素。
목적：탐토T2DM환자경도인지장애（MCI）상관적영향인소。방법채용몽특리이인지평고（MoCA）（북경판）량표작위인지적측평공구。선취 T2DM 환자226례，경MoCA량표평고，＜26분자132례위T2DM＋MCI조，≥26분자94례위 T2DM 조。수집병비교량조인구통계학화림상자료。용초성다보륵의검사쌍하지동맥적이상，병계산과굉지수（ABI）。용다공능채초진단경동맥내‐중막후도（CIM T ）혹유무동맥죽양경화（AS ）반괴。결과량조년령、SBP、T2DM 병정、교육정도、광억소‐C （Cys‐C）、혈뇨산（SUA）、FPG、BUN、재지단백A（ApoA）함량화재지단백B（ApoB）함량비교차이유통계학의의（P＜0.05혹 P＜0.01）。T2DM＋MCI조쌍하지동맥이상자87.4％，CIMT＞1.1 mm혹유AS반괴자67.9％，T2DM조칙29.7％、33.6％（χ2＝19.337、16.553），량조비교차이유통계학의의（P＜0.01）；T2DM 조대학이상학력자28.7％，T2DM ＋ MCI조위15.9％，량조비교차이유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。Logistic다원회귀분석현시，문화정도、년령、SBP화T2DM병정시MCI적영향인소。결론 T2DM 환자적병정、년령、SBP가능시MCI적위험인소，문화정도가능시MCI적보호인소。
Objective To study the factors that influence mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM ). Methods The Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) (Beijing) scale was used to assess cognitive function.A total of 226 T2DM patients were divided into two groups based on MoCA scores :those <26 points were defined as MCI(T2DM+MCI group ,n=132) ,≥26 points were considered as normal cognitive function (T2DM group ,n=94).Demographic and clinical data were collected and compared between the two groups.The lower extremity arteries were examined by Doppler ultrasound and ankle‐brachial indexes (ABIs ) were calculated.Multifunction ultrasound was used to evaluate carotid artery intima‐media thickness (CIMT) or the presence of atherosclerosis (AS) plaques.Results There were significant differences in age ,duration of T2DM ,education degree ,SBP ,FPG ,BUN , Apo‐A and Apo‐B levels between the two groups (P<0.05 or P<0.01).The proportions of abnormality in lower extremity arteries versus carotid arteries (CIMT > 1.1 mm or presence of AS plaque) were significantly higher in T2DM + MCI group than in T2DM group (87.4% vs 29.7% ,67.9% vs 33.6% , respectively ;χ2 =19.337 ,16.553 ,respectively) (P< 0.01).The proportion of patients having a college degree or above was significantly higher in T2DM+MCI group than in T2DM group (28.7% vs 15.9% , P<0.05).Logistic regression analysis showed that education ,age ,SBP and duration of T2DM were influencing factors for cognitive impairment. Conclusion T2DM course ,age ,SBP may be risk factors for cognitive impairment in T 2DM patients ,and high degree of education may be protective factors for cognitive impairment.