世界中医药
世界中醫藥
세계중의약
WORLD CHINESE MEDICINE
2015年
5期
716-719
,共4页
陈鸿%毛毅%张莉%赖玉琴
陳鴻%毛毅%張莉%賴玉琴
진홍%모의%장리%뢰옥금
慢性子宫附件炎%湿热瘀结型%间歇服药法%传统服药法
慢性子宮附件炎%濕熱瘀結型%間歇服藥法%傳統服藥法
만성자궁부건염%습열어결형%간헐복약법%전통복약법
Chronic pelvic inflammation disease%Damp-heat accumulated syndrome%Intermittent medication%Traditional medi-cation
目的:探讨间歇服药法治疗湿热瘀结型慢性子宫附件炎的有效性和安全性,为临床治疗慢性疾病提供新的方法,以便更好的安全用药,最大限度的减少药物不良反应,同时为患者提供更经济便捷的治疗方法。方法:将72例慢性子宫附件炎患者随机分为治疗组(36例)与对照组(36例),2组均服用银藤合剂治疗,治疗组采用间歇服药法,对照组采用传统服药法,2组均按上述方法连续服药8周。结果:治疗组愈显率88.89%,对照组愈显率86.11%,2组比较,差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。治疗组同对照组比较,胃肠道不良反应减少。结论:间歇服药法与传统服药法有同等的治疗效果,但对比之下,间歇服药法能减少患者经济负担,减少药物不良反应,可临床推广应用。
目的:探討間歇服藥法治療濕熱瘀結型慢性子宮附件炎的有效性和安全性,為臨床治療慢性疾病提供新的方法,以便更好的安全用藥,最大限度的減少藥物不良反應,同時為患者提供更經濟便捷的治療方法。方法:將72例慢性子宮附件炎患者隨機分為治療組(36例)與對照組(36例),2組均服用銀籐閤劑治療,治療組採用間歇服藥法,對照組採用傳統服藥法,2組均按上述方法連續服藥8週。結果:治療組愈顯率88.89%,對照組愈顯率86.11%,2組比較,差異無統計學意義( P>0.05)。治療組同對照組比較,胃腸道不良反應減少。結論:間歇服藥法與傳統服藥法有同等的治療效果,但對比之下,間歇服藥法能減少患者經濟負擔,減少藥物不良反應,可臨床推廣應用。
목적:탐토간헐복약법치료습열어결형만성자궁부건염적유효성화안전성,위림상치료만성질병제공신적방법,이편경호적안전용약,최대한도적감소약물불량반응,동시위환자제공경경제편첩적치료방법。방법:장72례만성자궁부건염환자수궤분위치료조(36례)여대조조(36례),2조균복용은등합제치료,치료조채용간헐복약법,대조조채용전통복약법,2조균안상술방법련속복약8주。결과:치료조유현솔88.89%,대조조유현솔86.11%,2조비교,차이무통계학의의( P>0.05)。치료조동대조조비교,위장도불량반응감소。결론:간헐복약법여전통복약법유동등적치료효과,단대비지하,간헐복약법능감소환자경제부담,감소약물불량반응,가림상추엄응용。
Objective:To explore the efficacy and safety of intermittent drug intake on treating chronic pelvic inflammatory disease due to damp heat and blood stasis;and provide a new method for the clinical treatment of chronic disease , which has a better drug safety and less side effects;and also was to help patients receive a more convenient and economical treatment .Methods:A total of 72 cases of chronic pelvic inflammatory disease were randomly divided into a treatment group ( 36 cases ) and a control group (36 cases) and both groups received silver vine mixture treatment .The treatment group received intermittent medication treatment and the control group received traditional medication treatment for 8 weeks.Results:The markedly effective rate of the treatment group was 88.89%and the control group was 86.11%.There was no significant statistical difference (P>0.05) between the two groups.Comparing with the control group , the treatment group showed less gastrointestinal side effects .Conclusion:Intermittent medication and the traditional medication have a similar efficacy , while intermittent medication method may decrease patients ’ eco-nomic burden and reduce the side effects , so could be applied to clinical treatment .