上海针灸杂志
上海針灸雜誌
상해침구잡지
SHANGHAI JOURNAL OF ACUPUNCTURE AND MOXIBUSTION
2015年
5期
440-441
,共2页
贺君%廖穆熙%孟珍珍%王冉冉
賀君%廖穆熙%孟珍珍%王冉冉
하군%료목희%맹진진%왕염염
针灸疗法%盆腔炎%齐刺%温针疗法
針灸療法%盆腔炎%齊刺%溫針療法
침구요법%분강염%제자%온침요법
Acupuncture-moxibustion%Pelvic infection%Triple needling%Needle warming therapy
目的:观察齐刺配合温针灸治疗寒湿凝滞型慢性盆腔炎的临床疗效。方法将60例符合纳入标准的寒湿凝滞型慢性盆腔炎患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组30例。对照组采用单纯针刺治疗,治疗组在对照组治疗基础上采用齐刺配合温针灸治疗,观察两组治疗前后临床症状、体征总积分,比较两组临床疗效。结果两组治疗后临床症状、体征总积分与同组治疗前比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.01,P<0.05)。治疗组治疗后临床症状、体征总积分与对照组比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组总有效率为93.3%,对照组为80.0%,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论齐刺配合温针灸是一种治疗慢性盆腔炎的有效方法。
目的:觀察齊刺配閤溫針灸治療寒濕凝滯型慢性盆腔炎的臨床療效。方法將60例符閤納入標準的寒濕凝滯型慢性盆腔炎患者隨機分為治療組和對照組,每組30例。對照組採用單純針刺治療,治療組在對照組治療基礎上採用齊刺配閤溫針灸治療,觀察兩組治療前後臨床癥狀、體徵總積分,比較兩組臨床療效。結果兩組治療後臨床癥狀、體徵總積分與同組治療前比較,差異均具有統計學意義(P<0.01,P<0.05)。治療組治療後臨床癥狀、體徵總積分與對照組比較,差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。治療組總有效率為93.3%,對照組為80.0%,兩組比較差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論齊刺配閤溫針灸是一種治療慢性盆腔炎的有效方法。
목적:관찰제자배합온침구치료한습응체형만성분강염적림상료효。방법장60례부합납입표준적한습응체형만성분강염환자수궤분위치료조화대조조,매조30례。대조조채용단순침자치료,치료조재대조조치료기출상채용제자배합온침구치료,관찰량조치료전후림상증상、체정총적분,비교량조림상료효。결과량조치료후림상증상、체정총적분여동조치료전비교,차이균구유통계학의의(P<0.01,P<0.05)。치료조치료후림상증상、체정총적분여대조조비교,차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。치료조총유효솔위93.3%,대조조위80.0%,량조비교차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론제자배합온침구시일충치료만성분강염적유효방법。
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of triple needling plus warm needling in treating chronic pelvic inflammation due to cold and damp stagnation.Method Sixty patients with chronic pelvic inflammation due to cold and damp stagnation were randomized into a treatment group and a control group, 30 in each group. The control group was intervened by ordinary acupuncture, while the treatment group was by triple needling and warm needling in addition to the ordinary acupuncture method. The symptom and sign scores were evaluated before and after intervention, and the clinical efficacies were compared. Result The symptom and sign scores were changed significantly after intervention in both groups (P<0.01,P<0.05). After intervention, the symptom and sign score in the treatment group was significantly different from that in the control group (P<0.05). The total effective rate was 93.3% in the treatment group versus 80.0% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion Triple needling plus warm needling is an effective method in treating chronic pelvic inflammation.