中国康复理论与实践
中國康複理論與實踐
중국강복이론여실천
CHINESE JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION THEORY & PRACTICE
2015年
5期
544-548
,共5页
刘程程%元香南%张立新%张志强
劉程程%元香南%張立新%張誌彊
류정정%원향남%장립신%장지강
足底压力%冲量%峰力值%负荷率%老年人
足底壓力%遲量%峰力值%負荷率%老年人
족저압력%충량%봉력치%부하솔%노년인
plantar pressure%impulse%max force%load rate%old adults
目的:比较老年人与青年人行走时足底压力特征。方法采用足底压力分布测试系统对30名年龄55~65岁的老年人及30名年龄18~23岁的健康大学生平地自然行走时进行测试,包括足底压力各区域冲量、峰力值、负荷率,以及足跟内侧、外侧接触面积百分比。结果冲量左、右侧比较,老年组7个区域有显著性差异,大学生组3个区域有显著性差异;老年组各区域冲量值低于大学生组(P<0.05)。最大峰力值左、右侧比较,老年组6个区域有显著性差异,大学生组3个区域有显著性差异;老年组各区域峰力值低于大学生组(P<0.05)。负荷率左、右侧比较,老年组7个区域有显著性差异,大学生组3个区域有显著性差异;老年组各区域负荷率小于大学生组(P<0.05)。老年人左、右足均足跟内侧接触面积大于足跟外侧(P<0.05),且左、右足间有显著性差异(P<0.05);大学生左、右足均足跟内侧接触面积小于足跟外侧(P<0.05),左、右足间无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论老年人足底压力冲量、峰力值、负荷率均低于青年人,左右侧压力分布差异更大。
目的:比較老年人與青年人行走時足底壓力特徵。方法採用足底壓力分佈測試繫統對30名年齡55~65歲的老年人及30名年齡18~23歲的健康大學生平地自然行走時進行測試,包括足底壓力各區域遲量、峰力值、負荷率,以及足跟內側、外側接觸麵積百分比。結果遲量左、右側比較,老年組7箇區域有顯著性差異,大學生組3箇區域有顯著性差異;老年組各區域遲量值低于大學生組(P<0.05)。最大峰力值左、右側比較,老年組6箇區域有顯著性差異,大學生組3箇區域有顯著性差異;老年組各區域峰力值低于大學生組(P<0.05)。負荷率左、右側比較,老年組7箇區域有顯著性差異,大學生組3箇區域有顯著性差異;老年組各區域負荷率小于大學生組(P<0.05)。老年人左、右足均足跟內側接觸麵積大于足跟外側(P<0.05),且左、右足間有顯著性差異(P<0.05);大學生左、右足均足跟內側接觸麵積小于足跟外側(P<0.05),左、右足間無顯著性差異(P>0.05)。結論老年人足底壓力遲量、峰力值、負荷率均低于青年人,左右側壓力分佈差異更大。
목적:비교노년인여청년인행주시족저압력특정。방법채용족저압력분포측시계통대30명년령55~65세적노년인급30명년령18~23세적건강대학생평지자연행주시진행측시,포괄족저압력각구역충량、봉력치、부하솔,이급족근내측、외측접촉면적백분비。결과충량좌、우측비교,노년조7개구역유현저성차이,대학생조3개구역유현저성차이;노년조각구역충량치저우대학생조(P<0.05)。최대봉력치좌、우측비교,노년조6개구역유현저성차이,대학생조3개구역유현저성차이;노년조각구역봉력치저우대학생조(P<0.05)。부하솔좌、우측비교,노년조7개구역유현저성차이,대학생조3개구역유현저성차이;노년조각구역부하솔소우대학생조(P<0.05)。노년인좌、우족균족근내측접촉면적대우족근외측(P<0.05),차좌、우족간유현저성차이(P<0.05);대학생좌、우족균족근내측접촉면적소우족근외측(P<0.05),좌、우족간무현저성차이(P>0.05)。결론노년인족저압력충량、봉력치、부하솔균저우청년인,좌우측압력분포차이경대。
Objective To compare the characteristics of plantar pressure between old and young people walking on flat. Methods 30 per-sons aged 55-65 years and 30 students aged 18-23 years were measured with a kind of plantar pressure measurement Footscan when they walked naturally, including impulse, max force, load rate of 10 regions, and distribution of the contact area of medial and lateral heels. Re-sults The impulse was significantly different in 7 regions between both sides in the old people, and in 3 regions in the students. The impulse was significantly less in the old people than in the students (P<0.05). The max force was significantly different in 6 regions between both sides in the old people, and in 3 regions in the students. The max force was significantly less in the old people than in the students (P<0.05). The load rate was significantly different in 7 regions between both sides in old people, and in 3 regions in students. The load rate was signifi-cantly less in the old people than in the students (P<0.05). The contact area was larger in the medial heel than the lateral heel in old people group (P<0.05), and it was different between left and right foot. While the contact area was smaller in the medial heel than the lateral heel in the students (P<0.05), and there was no difference between left and right foot (P>0.05). Conclusion The impulse, max force, load rate de-crease in the old people with the imbalance of distribution of the pressure between left and right.