CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探究股骨头坏死患者选择全髋关节置换术治疗的方法和效果。方法选取2013年9月～2014年10月收治36例股骨头坏死患者进行治疗，随机分组，实验组20例患者采用微创小切口的治疗，对照组16例患者选择传统的置换手术，对比患者的治疗效果。结果实验组患者并发症发生率为5%，治疗有效率为95.0%；对照组患者并发症发生率为18.8%，治疗有效率为75.0%。两组患者的治疗效果差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论股骨头坏死患者选择微创小切口的全髋关节置换术治疗，可达到良好的治疗效果，且病痛程度较小，治疗安全性较高，效果显著。
목적：탐구고골두배사환자선택전관관절치환술치료적방법화효과。방법선취2013년9월～2014년10월수치36례고골두배사환자진행치료，수궤분조，실험조20례환자채용미창소절구적치료，대조조16례환자선택전통적치환수술，대비환자적치료효과。결과실험조환자병발증발생솔위5%，치료유효솔위95.0%；대조조환자병발증발생솔위18.8%，치료유효솔위75.0%。량조환자적치료효과차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론고골두배사환자선택미창소절구적전관관절치환술치료，가체도량호적치료효과，차병통정도교소，치료안전성교고，효과현저。
Objective To explore treatment approach and its efficacy of total hip arthroplasty in treatment of osteonecrosis. Methods We chose 36 osteonecrosis patients who were treated in hospital from September 2013 to October 2014 and separated them into study group and control group at random,twenty patients in study group were given minimal y invasive incision treatment,while 16 patients in control group were given conventional arthroplasty surgery treatment and then observed and compared the treatment efficacy of these two groups. Results Complication incidence and treatment efficacy in study group were 5%and 95.0%,respectively,while complication incidence and treatment efficacy in control group were 18.8%and 75.0%,respectively. There was a treatment differential between two groups,and such a differential had statistic value(P<0.05). Conclusion Treating osteonecrosis patients with total hip arthroplasty of minimal y invasive incision is conducive to achieving desirable results,such a treatment approach is almost painless and safe.