中外女性健康研究
中外女性健康研究
중외녀성건강연구
Women's Health Research
2015年
5期
24-24,21
,共2页
付晓敏%宋熙科%董小燕%聂磊
付曉敏%宋熙科%董小燕%聶磊
부효민%송희과%동소연%섭뢰
安舒环%吉妮环%爱母环
安舒環%吉妮環%愛母環
안서배%길니배%애모배
Anshu-IUD%GyneFix IN IUD%MCu IUD
目的:探讨宫内节育器安舒环、吉妮环、爱母环的临床避孕效果及副反应。方法:2010年10月至2013年10月我院采用对比研究的方法,随机放置安舒环221例,吉妮环223例,爱母环220例,于放置后1、3、6、12个月进行随访。结果:安舒环的带器妊娠率、因症取出率低于吉妮环、爱母环。安舒环的累积续用率高于吉妮环、爱母环。安舒环、爱母环经期延长率、不规则出血发生率、白带增多率低于吉妮环。安舒环、吉妮环的腰腹痛发生率低于爱母环。安舒环经量减少率高于吉妮环、爱母环。结论:临床医生应根据患者子宫的具体情况,选择合适的IUD。
目的:探討宮內節育器安舒環、吉妮環、愛母環的臨床避孕效果及副反應。方法:2010年10月至2013年10月我院採用對比研究的方法,隨機放置安舒環221例,吉妮環223例,愛母環220例,于放置後1、3、6、12箇月進行隨訪。結果:安舒環的帶器妊娠率、因癥取齣率低于吉妮環、愛母環。安舒環的纍積續用率高于吉妮環、愛母環。安舒環、愛母環經期延長率、不規則齣血髮生率、白帶增多率低于吉妮環。安舒環、吉妮環的腰腹痛髮生率低于愛母環。安舒環經量減少率高于吉妮環、愛母環。結論:臨床醫生應根據患者子宮的具體情況,選擇閤適的IUD。
목적:탐토궁내절육기안서배、길니배、애모배적림상피잉효과급부반응。방법:2010년10월지2013년10월아원채용대비연구적방법,수궤방치안서배221례,길니배223례,애모배220례,우방치후1、3、6、12개월진행수방。결과:안서배적대기임신솔、인증취출솔저우길니배、애모배。안서배적루적속용솔고우길니배、애모배。안서배、애모배경기연장솔、불규칙출혈발생솔、백대증다솔저우길니배。안서배、길니배적요복통발생솔저우애모배。안서배경량감소솔고우길니배、애모배。결론:림상의생응근거환자자궁적구체정황,선택합괄적IUD。
Objective: To observe the clinical contraceptive effect and side effect of 3 types of intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUD), Anshu-IUD, GyneFix IN IUD and MCu IUD. Methods: From October 2010 to October 2013, comparative study was carried out by applying 221 Anshu IUDs, 223 GyneFix IN IUDs, and 220 MCu IUDs to women. Follow-up survey were taken after 1,3,6,and 12 months. Results: Compared with the other two types of IUDs, the Anshu IUD had lower pregnancy rates, lower removal rates because of side-effect , and higher cumulative continuation rates.The menostaxis rate, abnormal vaginal bleeding rate, and leucorrhea increase rate of Anshu-IUD and MCu IUD are lower than that of GyneFix IN IUD. The osphyalgia and bellyache rate of Anshu-IUD and GyneFix IN IUD are lower than that of MCu IUD. The menstrual blood volume decrease rate of Anshu-IUD is higher than that of the GyneFix IN IUD and MCu IUD. Conclusion: The clinicians should select the most suitable IUD for the acceptor according to her physical and health conditions.