中国社区医师
中國社區醫師
중국사구의사
Chinese Community Doctors
2015年
14期
108-109
,共2页
徐爱霞%沈乃澎%李永奎%邓金龙%张仕状
徐愛霞%瀋迺澎%李永奎%鄧金龍%張仕狀
서애하%침내팽%리영규%산금룡%장사상
子宫输卵管造影%数字胃肠机%图像质量
子宮輸卵管造影%數字胃腸機%圖像質量
자궁수란관조영%수자위장궤%도상질량
Hysterosalpingography%Digital gastrointestinal machine%Image quality
目的:探讨飞利浦OE数字胃肠机与西门子dRF数字胃肠机在常规模式下进行子宫输卵管造影检查对摄片图像质量的影响,分析影响图像质量的原因,并进一步探讨两种数字胃肠机 HSG 检查对子宫、输卵管病变显示的影响。方法:A组:HSG检查240例次,选用监视设备为飞利浦OE数字胃肠机;B组:HSG检查246例次,选用监视设备为西门子dRF数字胃肠机,对A、B两组受检者采用同样的造影方法,共用1个PACS系统,并在1个电脑显示屏上对检查结果进行观察,并比较A、B两组受检者子宫造影结果、输卵管通畅度及摄片图像质量的差异。结果:A、B两组受检者子宫造影结果及输卵管通畅度比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A、B两组摄片图像质量比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:常规模式下西门子dRF数字胃肠机进行HSG检查比飞利浦OE数字胃肠机摄片图像质量高,但两种数字胃肠机在HSG检查中皆能满足诊断要求。
目的:探討飛利浦OE數字胃腸機與西門子dRF數字胃腸機在常規模式下進行子宮輸卵管造影檢查對攝片圖像質量的影響,分析影響圖像質量的原因,併進一步探討兩種數字胃腸機 HSG 檢查對子宮、輸卵管病變顯示的影響。方法:A組:HSG檢查240例次,選用鑑視設備為飛利浦OE數字胃腸機;B組:HSG檢查246例次,選用鑑視設備為西門子dRF數字胃腸機,對A、B兩組受檢者採用同樣的造影方法,共用1箇PACS繫統,併在1箇電腦顯示屏上對檢查結果進行觀察,併比較A、B兩組受檢者子宮造影結果、輸卵管通暢度及攝片圖像質量的差異。結果:A、B兩組受檢者子宮造影結果及輸卵管通暢度比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);A、B兩組攝片圖像質量比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論:常規模式下西門子dRF數字胃腸機進行HSG檢查比飛利浦OE數字胃腸機攝片圖像質量高,但兩種數字胃腸機在HSG檢查中皆能滿足診斷要求。
목적:탐토비리포OE수자위장궤여서문자dRF수자위장궤재상규모식하진행자궁수란관조영검사대섭편도상질량적영향,분석영향도상질량적원인,병진일보탐토량충수자위장궤 HSG 검사대자궁、수란관병변현시적영향。방법:A조:HSG검사240례차,선용감시설비위비리포OE수자위장궤;B조:HSG검사246례차,선용감시설비위서문자dRF수자위장궤,대A、B량조수검자채용동양적조영방법,공용1개PACS계통,병재1개전뇌현시병상대검사결과진행관찰,병비교A、B량조수검자자궁조영결과、수란관통창도급섭편도상질량적차이。결과:A、B량조수검자자궁조영결과급수란관통창도비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);A、B량조섭편도상질량비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론:상규모식하서문자dRF수자위장궤진행HSG검사비비리포OE수자위장궤섭편도상질량고,단량충수자위장궤재HSG검사중개능만족진단요구。
Objective:To explore the influences on the radiography image quality of Philips OE digital gastrointestinal machine and Siemens dRF digital gastrointestinal machine under normal mode in hysterosalpingography examination.Methods:A group:240 cases had HSG examination,the selection of monitoring equipment was Philips OE digital gastrointestinal machine.B group:246 cases had HSG examination,the selection of monitoring equipment was Siemens dRF digital gastrointestinal machine.The subjects in A group and B group were given the same imaging method and shared a PACS system,and the inspection results were observed in a computer screen.The differences of uterine angiography results,tubal patency degrees and radiography image qualities of subjects in A group and B group were compared.Results:The uterine angiography results,tubal patency degrees of subjects in A group and B group were compared with no significant difference(P>0.05).The radiography image qualities of subjects in A group and B group were compared with significant difference(P<0.05).Conclusion:Siemens dRF digital gastrointestinal machine under normal mode for HSG examination has higher radiography image quality than that of Philips OE digital gastrointestinal machine.But the two digital gastrointestinal machine in the HSG examination can meet the requirement of diagnosis.