知识产权
知識產權
지식산권
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
2015年
5期
56-61
,共6页
3D打印%商标侵权%间接侵权%避风港规则%技术措施
3D打印%商標侵權%間接侵權%避風港規則%技術措施
3D타인%상표침권%간접침권%피풍항규칙%기술조시
3D printing%trademark infringement%indirect infringement%“safe harbor”rules%technical measures
3D打印技术使得产品制造和传播更为便利，也使得商标侵权的可能性提高，然而在侵权认定方面存在困境。非商业性3D打印产品，传播、销售设计图不构成直接商标侵权，间接侵权认定也存在局限。有必要取消“在商业活动中使用”作为侵权构成要件，拓展商标间接侵权制度，将“避风港”规则引入商标领域，对技术措施、商业外观和虚拟数字模型给予商标保护，以便在3D打印环境下为商标权人提供有效保护。
3D打印技術使得產品製造和傳播更為便利，也使得商標侵權的可能性提高，然而在侵權認定方麵存在睏境。非商業性3D打印產品，傳播、銷售設計圖不構成直接商標侵權，間接侵權認定也存在跼限。有必要取消“在商業活動中使用”作為侵權構成要件，拓展商標間接侵權製度，將“避風港”規則引入商標領域，對技術措施、商業外觀和虛擬數字模型給予商標保護，以便在3D打印環境下為商標權人提供有效保護。
3D타인기술사득산품제조화전파경위편리，야사득상표침권적가능성제고，연이재침권인정방면존재곤경。비상업성3D타인산품，전파、소수설계도불구성직접상표침권，간접침권인정야존재국한。유필요취소“재상업활동중사용”작위침권구성요건，탁전상표간접침권제도，장“피풍항”규칙인입상표영역，대기술조시、상업외관화허의수자모형급여상표보호，이편재3D타인배경하위상표권인제공유효보호。
3D printing technology makes manufacturing and communication of products more convenient, but also makes the possibility of trademark infringement higher, while the determination of trademark infringement is inconvenient. Non-commercial 3D printing of products, dissemination and distribution of designs do not constitute direct trademark infringement, while the determination of indirect infringement is limited. It is necessary to abolish the"business use"as the elements of infringement, expand indirect infringement of trademark, introduce"safe harbor"rules into trademark ifeld, and protect technical measures, business appearance and virtual digital model by trademark law, in order to protect trademark owners in the environment of 3D printing.
