CAJ | 학술논문

商业秘密案件因涉及“专门技术事实”或“专门性问题”，不能成为司法鉴定之当然理由，司法鉴定结论不能成为一种“证实的偏见”抑或“依赖”。把司法鉴定之法律本质及证据规则具体适用纳入司法鉴定必要性之考量范围，乃兼顾实体与程序之不二选择。司法实践中，鉴定对象应仅限争议双方所提供的“检材”；鉴定结论限于“检材”是否影响涉案商业秘密之“秘密性”，及争议双方信息之相同或实质性相同的判断。商业秘密司法鉴定是一种判断行为，不能存有检索行为，现行商业秘密鉴定方式有待规范，否则难逃以商业秘密之“秘密性”鉴定为名，行“新颖性”判断之实的宿命，势必影响司法的公正与效率，应当引起各界的重视。
상업비밀안건인섭급“전문기술사실”혹“전문성문제”，불능성위사법감정지당연이유，사법감정결론불능성위일충“증실적편견”억혹“의뢰”。파사법감정지법률본질급증거규칙구체괄용납입사법감정필요성지고량범위，내겸고실체여정서지불이선택。사법실천중，감정대상응부한쟁의쌍방소제공적“검재”；감정결론한우“검재”시부영향섭안상업비밀지“비밀성”，급쟁의쌍방신식지상동혹실질성상동적판단。상업비밀사법감정시일충판단행위，불능존유검색행위，현행상업비밀감정방식유대규범，부칙난도이상업비밀지“비밀성”감정위명，행“신영성”판단지실적숙명，세필영향사법적공정여효솔，응당인기각계적중시。
Due to“technical facts”or“special issues”involved, the trade secret cases cannot be the merited reason for judicial expertise, and the conclusion of judicial expertise cannot become some kind of“proven bias”or“dependency”. Incorporating the legal nature and the specific application rules of evidence into the consideration scope of the necessity of judicial expertise is the best choice taking both substance and procedure into account. In judicial practice, the object of judicial expertise shall be restricted to the“check sample”provided by the disputed parties;the conclusion of judicial expertise shall be restricted to whether the“check sample”has inlfuenced the“secrecy”of the trade secret involved in the case, and the judgment of identity or substantial identity of the information of the disputed parties. Judicial expertise of trade secret is a judgment behavior, there cannot be retrieval behavior, and the current judicial expertise methods of trade secrets need to be standardized, otherwise it’s hard to escape from the destiny where"novelty"judgment is carried out in the name of judicial expertise of“secrecy”of trade secret, which is bound to affect the fairness and efifciency of justice and should be paid attention to by all circles.