听力学及言语疾病杂志
聽力學及言語疾病雜誌
은역학급언어질병잡지
JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY AND SPEECH PATHOLOGY
2015年
3期
287-290
,共4页
刘欣%刘海红%孔颖%任寸寸%杨宜林%刘莎
劉訢%劉海紅%孔穎%任吋吋%楊宜林%劉莎
류흔%류해홍%공영%임촌촌%양의림%류사
儿童%人工耳蜗植入%助听器%开放式言语识别测试
兒童%人工耳蝸植入%助聽器%開放式言語識彆測試
인동%인공이와식입%조은기%개방식언어식별측시
Children%Cochlear implant%Hearing aid%Open-set speech test
目的:初步探讨术前助听器佩戴史对婴幼儿人工耳蜗植入(cochlear implant ,CI)者早期开放式言语识别的影响。方法植入年龄0.9~3.0岁的CI儿童306例,按照术前是否佩带助听器分为助听器(hearing aid , HA)组94例,非助听器(non-hearing aid ,NHA)组212例,用普通话词汇相邻性测试(Mandarin lexical neighbor‐hood test ,M -LNT)分别对两组受试儿童进行开放式言语识别能力评估,比较两组儿童M -LNT 正确识别率。结果年龄相同或人工耳蜗使用时长相同的助听器组与非助听器组间M -LNT正确识别率的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);术前佩戴助听器不同时长者与非助听器组之间M -LNT 识别率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对于0.9~3.0岁行人工耳蜗植入术的重度和极重度听力损失儿童,术前有无助听器佩戴史对其术后开放式言语识别能力无显著影响。
目的:初步探討術前助聽器珮戴史對嬰幼兒人工耳蝸植入(cochlear implant ,CI)者早期開放式言語識彆的影響。方法植入年齡0.9~3.0歲的CI兒童306例,按照術前是否珮帶助聽器分為助聽器(hearing aid , HA)組94例,非助聽器(non-hearing aid ,NHA)組212例,用普通話詞彙相鄰性測試(Mandarin lexical neighbor‐hood test ,M -LNT)分彆對兩組受試兒童進行開放式言語識彆能力評估,比較兩組兒童M -LNT 正確識彆率。結果年齡相同或人工耳蝸使用時長相同的助聽器組與非助聽器組間M -LNT正確識彆率的差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05);術前珮戴助聽器不同時長者與非助聽器組之間M -LNT 識彆率差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論對于0.9~3.0歲行人工耳蝸植入術的重度和極重度聽力損失兒童,術前有無助聽器珮戴史對其術後開放式言語識彆能力無顯著影響。
목적:초보탐토술전조은기패대사대영유인인공이와식입(cochlear implant ,CI)자조기개방식언어식별적영향。방법식입년령0.9~3.0세적CI인동306례,안조술전시부패대조은기분위조은기(hearing aid , HA)조94례,비조은기(non-hearing aid ,NHA)조212례,용보통화사회상린성측시(Mandarin lexical neighbor‐hood test ,M -LNT)분별대량조수시인동진행개방식언어식별능력평고,비교량조인동M -LNT 정학식별솔。결과년령상동혹인공이와사용시장상동적조은기조여비조은기조간M -LNT정학식별솔적차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05);술전패대조은기불동시장자여비조은기조지간M -LNT 식별솔차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론대우0.9~3.0세행인공이와식입술적중도화겁중도은력손실인동,술전유무조은기패대사대기술후개방식언어식별능력무현저영향。
Objective To explore the impact of pre-implant hearing aid fitting on the early open-set word recognition in children who received a cochlear implant(CI) when they were infants .Methods A total of 289 chil‐dren who received a cochlear implant between 0 .9 and 3 .0 years of age were included in this study .According to pre-implant hearing aid fitting ,participants were divided into hearing aid group and non-hearing aid group .The open-set word identification abilities of the cochlear implant children were evaluated via Mandarin Lexical Neighborhood test(M -LNT) .Results Comparisons of the scores of M -LNT between two groups displayed no significant differ‐ence at the same identification age or duration of CI use .Conclusion The abilities of the early open-set word rec‐ognition between hearing aid group and non-hearing aid group didn’t make significant differences for the CI chil‐dren w ho received a cochlear implant betw een 0 .9 and 3 .0 years old .