听力学及言语疾病杂志
聽力學及言語疾病雜誌
은역학급언어질병잡지
JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY AND SPEECH PATHOLOGY
2015年
3期
261-264
,共4页
李艳%葛平江%彭莉佳%盛晓丽%许咪咪%任庆宜%陈少华
李豔%葛平江%彭莉佳%盛曉麗%許咪咪%任慶宜%陳少華
리염%갈평강%팽리가%성효려%허미미%임경의%진소화
声带小结%嗓音训练%嗓音评估
聲帶小結%嗓音訓練%嗓音評估
성대소결%상음훈련%상음평고
Vocal nodules%Voice therapy%Evaluation of voice
目的:探讨嗓音训练对声带小结患者发声障碍的治疗效果。方法对21例声带小结患者进行嗓音训练,包括嗓音教育和发声训练,根据“呼吸-发声-共鸣”平衡原理,采用喉部按摩、无声练习及发大开口咽音的训练方法,每周训练一次,每次1~2小时,共5次。训练前后对患者进行嗓音障碍指数量表(VHI)评估、GRBAS评估、动态喉镜检查、空气动力学检测、计算机嗓音声学分析,比较治疗前后评估结果。结果21例患者治疗后VHI评分总分(29.48±21.21分)明显低于治疗前(52.95±24.30分)(P<0.01);GRBAS评分中总嘶哑度G(0.67±0.76)明显低于训练前(1.88±1.05)(P<0.01),粗糙声R(0.52±0.58)明显低于训练前(1.36±0.55)(P<0.01);治疗后动态喉镜检查患者声带闭合、运动的对称性、粘膜波、振动规律性均改善(P<0.01);3例患者声带小结完全消失,13例患者声带小结缩小,5例与治疗前比较无明显变化;最长发声时间也由治疗前的8.87±3.75秒变为治疗后的12.54±3.68秒( P<0.01);治疗后嗓音的频率微扰、振幅微扰、噪谐比(分别为0.18%±0.08%、2.10%±0.98%、0.0034±0.0022 dB )均明显低于治疗前(分别为0.43%±0.31%、4.55%±1.80%、0.0184±0.028 dB )( P<0.01或0.05)。结论嗓音训练对声带小结患者发声障碍有良好的治疗效果。
目的:探討嗓音訓練對聲帶小結患者髮聲障礙的治療效果。方法對21例聲帶小結患者進行嗓音訓練,包括嗓音教育和髮聲訓練,根據“呼吸-髮聲-共鳴”平衡原理,採用喉部按摩、無聲練習及髮大開口嚥音的訓練方法,每週訓練一次,每次1~2小時,共5次。訓練前後對患者進行嗓音障礙指數量錶(VHI)評估、GRBAS評估、動態喉鏡檢查、空氣動力學檢測、計算機嗓音聲學分析,比較治療前後評估結果。結果21例患者治療後VHI評分總分(29.48±21.21分)明顯低于治療前(52.95±24.30分)(P<0.01);GRBAS評分中總嘶啞度G(0.67±0.76)明顯低于訓練前(1.88±1.05)(P<0.01),粗糙聲R(0.52±0.58)明顯低于訓練前(1.36±0.55)(P<0.01);治療後動態喉鏡檢查患者聲帶閉閤、運動的對稱性、粘膜波、振動規律性均改善(P<0.01);3例患者聲帶小結完全消失,13例患者聲帶小結縮小,5例與治療前比較無明顯變化;最長髮聲時間也由治療前的8.87±3.75秒變為治療後的12.54±3.68秒( P<0.01);治療後嗓音的頻率微擾、振幅微擾、譟諧比(分彆為0.18%±0.08%、2.10%±0.98%、0.0034±0.0022 dB )均明顯低于治療前(分彆為0.43%±0.31%、4.55%±1.80%、0.0184±0.028 dB )( P<0.01或0.05)。結論嗓音訓練對聲帶小結患者髮聲障礙有良好的治療效果。
목적:탐토상음훈련대성대소결환자발성장애적치료효과。방법대21례성대소결환자진행상음훈련,포괄상음교육화발성훈련,근거“호흡-발성-공명”평형원리,채용후부안마、무성연습급발대개구인음적훈련방법,매주훈련일차,매차1~2소시,공5차。훈련전후대환자진행상음장애지수량표(VHI)평고、GRBAS평고、동태후경검사、공기동역학검측、계산궤상음성학분석,비교치료전후평고결과。결과21례환자치료후VHI평분총분(29.48±21.21분)명현저우치료전(52.95±24.30분)(P<0.01);GRBAS평분중총시아도G(0.67±0.76)명현저우훈련전(1.88±1.05)(P<0.01),조조성R(0.52±0.58)명현저우훈련전(1.36±0.55)(P<0.01);치료후동태후경검사환자성대폐합、운동적대칭성、점막파、진동규률성균개선(P<0.01);3례환자성대소결완전소실,13례환자성대소결축소,5례여치료전비교무명현변화;최장발성시간야유치료전적8.87±3.75초변위치료후적12.54±3.68초( P<0.01);치료후상음적빈솔미우、진폭미우、조해비(분별위0.18%±0.08%、2.10%±0.98%、0.0034±0.0022 dB )균명현저우치료전(분별위0.43%±0.31%、4.55%±1.80%、0.0184±0.028 dB )( P<0.01혹0.05)。결론상음훈련대성대소결환자발성장애유량호적치료효과。
Objective To investigate the effect of voice training therapy on the voice improvement in patients with vocal nodules .Methods Twenty one patients with vocal nodules were recruited and were evaluated by the GRBAS perpetual evaluation ,voice handicap index (VHI)-30 subjective assessment ,vocal laryngostroboscopy , maximum phonation time (MPT) and acoustic analysis pre- and post-therapy .These patients completed 5 cour‐ses of voice training .Results The VHI value(29 .48 ± 21 .21) of post-therapy was less than the value (52 .95 ± 24 . 30)of pre -therapy (P< 0 .01) .There were significantly differences in voice perpetual evaluation between pre -training and post-training ,especially for G (grade) (P<0 .01) and R (roughness) (P<0 .01) .The post-training laryngostrobescopy vocal vibration improved comparing with pre-therapy in the closure of vocal cords ,symmetry of vibration ,the mucosal wave and vibration regularity of the vocal cords .After therapy ,three patient nodules dis‐appeared ,thirteen patient nodules became smaller ,and five patient nodules remained the same .The maximum pho‐nation time (MPT) (12 .54 ± 3 .68)of post-therapy was longer than MPT(8 .87 ± 3 .75) of pre-therapy MPT(P<0 .01) .The jitter value (0 .18% ± 0 .08% ) of post -therapy was less than that of pre-therapy(0 .43% ± 0 .31% ) (P<0 .01) .The shimmer of post -therapy (2 .10% ± 0 .98% ) was less than that of pre -therapy (4 .55% ± 1 .80% )(P<0 .01) ,The ratio of noise to harmonic(NHR)(0 .0034 ± 0 .0022 dB) of post-therapy was significantly less than NHR(0 .0184 ± 0 .028 dB)(P<0 .05) of pre-therapy .Conclusion The voice therapy could significantlyimprove voice of patients with vocal nodules .