CAJ | 학술논문

目的：分析胺碘酮治疗急性心肌梗死伴心房颤动的临床效果。方法：回顾性分析120例急性心肌梗死并发房颤患者的临床资料，将其随机分为观察组与对照组，每组各60例，对照组静脉注射西地兰进行治疗，观察组则采用胺碘酮进行治疗，比较两组患者的治疗效果。结果：观察组显效36例，有效21例，无效3例，总有效率为95%，对照组显效25例，有效23例，无效12例，总有效率80%，观察组的总有效率显著高于对照组，且对照组不良反应率显著高于观察组，差异具统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论：胺碘酮治疗急性心肌梗死伴心房颤动效果确切，不良反应少。
목적：분석알전동치료급성심기경사반심방전동적림상효과。방법：회고성분석120례급성심기경사병발방전환자적림상자료，장기수궤분위관찰조여대조조，매조각60례，대조조정맥주사서지란진행치료，관찰조칙채용알전동진행치료，비교량조환자적치료효과。결과：관찰조현효36례，유효21례，무효3례，총유효솔위95%，대조조현효25례，유효23례，무효12례，총유효솔80%，관찰조적총유효솔현저고우대조조，차대조조불량반응솔현저고우관찰조，차이구통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론：알전동치료급성심기경사반심방전동효과학절，불량반응소。
Objective:to analyze the amiodarone in treatment of acute myocardial infarction with atrial fibrillation:clinical re-sults.Methods: retrospective analysis of 120 cases of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated atrial fibrillation clinical data, which were randomly divided into groups and control groups, 60 cases in each group, control group cedilanid for intravenous treatment, amiodarone treatment is used in the observation group, compared two groups of patients therapeutic effect. Results: effective group 36 cases, 21 cases, 3 cases, the total effective rate of 95%, and 25 cases for control, effective 23, 12 cases, the total effective rate 80%, observation group, the overall response rate was significantly higher than the control group, adverse reactions were significantly higher than the study group and the control group, a statistically significant difference (P<0.05) .Conclusion:amiodarone in treatment of acute myocardial infarction with atrial fibrillation results and fewer side effects.