浙江医学教育
浙江醫學教育
절강의학교육
Zhejiang Medical Education
2015年
3期
58-60
,共3页
负压封闭引流技术%老年糖尿病足溃疡患者%传统换药疗法
負壓封閉引流技術%老年糖尿病足潰瘍患者%傳統換藥療法
부압봉폐인류기술%노년당뇨병족궤양환자%전통환약요법
vacuum sealing drainage%senile patients with diabetic foot ulcers%traditional changing medication therapy
目的：研究负压封闭引流（VSD ）技术对老年糖尿病足溃疡（DFUs ）患者的临床治疗效果。方法：50例老年DFUs患者随机分为治疗组和对照组（各25例），在相同基础治疗的前提下，分别给以VSD技术和传统换药疗法治疗，观察治疗效果，并记录2组患者换药次数和愈合时间。结果：VSD治疗组患者术后总有效率高达100％，对照组仅为60．00％差异有统计学意义（ P＜0．05）；治疗组患者平均换药次数（5±0．55）次，平均愈合时间为（16±1．45）天，而对照组平均换药次数为（15±1．35）次，平均愈合时间高达（22±1．55）天，存在统计学意义（ P＜0．05）。结论：VSD技术可明显改善老年DFUs患者创面难以愈合情况，有望应于临床治疗中。
目的：研究負壓封閉引流（VSD ）技術對老年糖尿病足潰瘍（DFUs ）患者的臨床治療效果。方法：50例老年DFUs患者隨機分為治療組和對照組（各25例），在相同基礎治療的前提下，分彆給以VSD技術和傳統換藥療法治療，觀察治療效果，併記錄2組患者換藥次數和愈閤時間。結果：VSD治療組患者術後總有效率高達100％，對照組僅為60．00％差異有統計學意義（ P＜0．05）；治療組患者平均換藥次數（5±0．55）次，平均愈閤時間為（16±1．45）天，而對照組平均換藥次數為（15±1．35）次，平均愈閤時間高達（22±1．55）天，存在統計學意義（ P＜0．05）。結論：VSD技術可明顯改善老年DFUs患者創麵難以愈閤情況，有望應于臨床治療中。
목적：연구부압봉폐인류（VSD ）기술대노년당뇨병족궤양（DFUs ）환자적림상치료효과。방법：50례노년DFUs환자수궤분위치료조화대조조（각25례），재상동기출치료적전제하，분별급이VSD기술화전통환약요법치료，관찰치료효과，병기록2조환자환약차수화유합시간。결과：VSD치료조환자술후총유효솔고체100％，대조조부위60．00％차이유통계학의의（ P＜0．05）；치료조환자평균환약차수（5±0．55）차，평균유합시간위（16±1．45）천，이대조조평균환약차수위（15±1．35）차，평균유합시간고체（22±1．55）천，존재통계학의의（ P＜0．05）。결론：VSD기술가명현개선노년DFUs환자창면난이유합정황，유망응우림상치료중。
Objective] Toobserve the clinic treatment effects of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) technology on senile patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) .[Method]50 senile patients with DFUs were randomly divided into two groups ,25 patients per group .Under the premise of similar basic treatment ,one group acted as treatment group was treated with VSD technology , while the other one acted as control group treated with traditional changing medication therapy parallel .Total curative rates ,fre-quency of dressing change and healing time of two groups were observed and recorded .[Result]It existed a significant differ-ence between treatment group and control group as the total curative rate of treatment group was 100% while control group was only 60 .00% ( P<0 .05) .Average of frequency of dressing change in treatment group was (5 ± 0 .55) times ,and average healing time was (16 ± 1 .45 ) days ,while those of the control group was (15 ± 1 .35 ) days or (22 ± 1 .55 ) days ,respectively , which has a statistical difference ( P<0 .05 ) . [Conclusion]By VSD technology expected to be in the clinical treatment ,the healing condition of the wound of DFUs which was cured hardly could be obviously improved .
